How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cyclotomic Arithmetic and Reciprocity via Frobenius — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Cyclotomic Arithmetic and Reciprocity via Frobenius
- Decomposition Inertia and Frobenius
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Number Fields Rings of Integers and Discriminants
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Prime Ideal Decomposition Ramification and the Different
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Primitive Roots and Unit Groups Modulo N
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Quadratic Residues and the Legendre Symbol
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Solvability by Radicals and Kummer Theory
- Splitting Fields
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
Concrete cyclotomic fields test each mechanism of the parent page. shows the reduced-conductor correction that the unreduced displayed index would obscure; , , and display total ramification, inert primes, and the four residue classes modulo eight and twelve that control splitting.
On the reciprocity side, the Gauss sums at and are evaluated explicitly ( and ), exhibits the quadratic subfield , and is worked through as the smallest nontrivial instance of the Frobenius restriction identity. A counterexample records that the sign of a Gauss sum changes with the chosen primitive root even though its square and its field do not.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The reduced conductor of Q(zeta_6)
Example
, the conductor of this field is , and the rational prime is unramified in it: is prime, with residue degree .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A primitive sixth root of unity and a primitive third root of unity , with and the corresponding cyclotomic fields (The cyclotomic extension as a splitting field of ).
For odd , is a primitive -th root of unity, so (Conductor of a full cyclotomic field).
The conductor of is when is odd or and is when (Conductor of a full cyclotomic field, Cyclotomic conductor of a full cyclotomic field).
Ramification criterion: for a cyclotomic field presented by its reduced index , a rational prime ramifies if and only if (Ramification primes of a reduced cyclotomic conductor).
Unramified decomposition: if for the reduced index of , then every prime above has residue degree and there are of them (Decomposition of an unramified prime in a cyclotomic field).
Verification
Taking in [F1], is a primitive sixth root of unity, so .
By [F2] with , the conductor of is .
The reduced index of this field is , and , so [F3] shows that is unramified in ; by [F4] with , , the residue degree is and the number of primes above is , so is prime of degree .
Remarks
- Why the displayed index is a trap. The index is not reduced: an inference of the form " ramifies" would wrongly make ramified, since ; the actual conductor is , and fails. This is the exceptional shape excluded in the ramification criterion.
- Frobenius viewpoint. Since , the arithmetic Frobenius at acts by and has order , matching the single degree-two prime above .
Arithmetic of Q(zeta_5)
Example
For one has and . The prime is totally ramified: is a fourth power of the unique prime above , whose residue field is . The prime is unramified with a single prime above it of residue degree (residue field ) and trivial inertia group; and splits completely into four degree-one primes.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A primitive fifth root of unity and , of degree (The cyclotomic extension as a splitting field of ).
, with integral basis (Ring of integers of every cyclotomic field).
Discriminant: for the reduced index , (Signed discriminant of a cyclotomic field).
Total ramification at a prime-power level: with , , and is the unique prime of above , with residue field (Total ramification at a prime-power cyclotomic level).
Unramified decomposition: for the reduced index and a prime , every prime above has residue degree and there are of them (Decomposition of an unramified prime in a cyclotomic field).
Complete splitting: for , the prime splits completely in if and only if (Complete splitting criterion for a cyclotomic field).
For finite Galois extensions the inertia group at a prime has order equal to the ramification exponent, , and is unramified over if and only if its inertia group is trivial (Inertia group of a prime, Orders of decomposition and inertia groups).
Verification
Since , the discriminant formula gives .
The multiplicative order of modulo is : the powers of modulo are , so .
The class is the identity of .
By [F3], with the unique prime above and residue field ; its ramification exponent is , so is totally ramified and its inertia group at has order , the full Galois group.
By [F4] and step 1.2 applied with , there is exactly prime above , of residue degree ; its residue field has elements, and since is unramified its inertia group is trivial by [F6], so with .
By [F5] and step 1.3, splits completely in : there are distinct primes above , each of ramification exponent and residue degree .
Collecting the results: with an integral basis, , the prime is totally ramified with , the prime has one prime above it of residue degree and trivial inertia, and splits into four degree-one primes.
Remarks
- Unramified decomposition has three cases. For a prime , the orders modulo are for the classes , respectively. Thus [F4] gives four degree-one primes, two degree-two primes, or one degree-four prime. In particular is inert, while gives two primes, each of residue degree .
- Frobenius orders. The arithmetic Frobenius at has order and generates the full group , while the Frobenius at is trivial, which is complete splitting in the sense of Complete splitting criterion for a cyclotomic field.
Prime decomposition in Q(zeta_8)
Example
For the discriminant is . Every odd rational prime is unramified; its residue degree is if it is and is otherwise, with respectively four or two primes above it. In particular an odd prime splits completely in exactly when it is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A primitive eighth root of unity and , a reduced index since (The cyclotomic extension as a splitting field of ).
Discriminant formula: for the reduced index , (Signed discriminant of a cyclotomic field).
Unramified decomposition: for the reduced index and a prime , every prime above has residue degree and there are of them (Decomposition of an unramified prime in a cyclotomic field).
Complete splitting: for , the prime splits completely in if and only if (Complete splitting criterion for a cyclotomic field).
and the unit group is ; the class has order , while with , so those three classes have order (The unit group and Euler's totient for , The order of a finite group and the order of an element, with when no positive power of is the identity).
Verification
Since and the only prime divisor of is , the formula gives .
For an odd prime the class of modulo lies in ; by [F4] it has order exactly for the class , and order for the classes .
By [F2] with odd, the primes above number and each has residue degree . Hence gives primes of residue degree (residue fields ), and by [F3] this is exactly the complete splitting condition; each of gives primes, of residue degree (residue fields ).
Summary: , every odd prime is unramified, and its splitting type in depends only on : four degree-one primes for , two degree-two primes for ; in all cases .
Remarks
- Only ramifies. The discriminant has the single prime divisor , and indeed with reduced; this is the pair's ramification criterion at the conductor .
- Relation to the second supplement. Since contains , the degree-two prime divisors of an odd refine the statement of the second supplement; for the quadratic subfield splits.
Prime decomposition in Q(zeta_12)
Example
For the discriminant is . The primes and each have a unique prime of above them, with ; and a rational prime splits into four primes of residue degree when , and into two primes of residue degree when .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A primitive twelfth root of unity and , a reduced index since (The cyclotomic extension as a splitting field of ).
Discriminant formula: for a reduced index with , (Signed discriminant of a cyclotomic field).
Prime factorisation: for the reduced index , a rational prime , and with , one has with , , , and the pairwise distinct primes of residue degree (Prime factorisation in a cyclotomic field).
For every prime above has residue degree and their number is (Decomposition of an unramified prime in a cyclotomic field).
For , the prime splits completely in if and only if (Complete splitting criterion for a cyclotomic field).
, and the unit group is , in which every element has order or : has order , while with (The unit group and Euler's totient for , The order of a finite group and the order of an element, with when no positive power of is the identity).
Verification
The data , and give .
For write , so , : , (as and ) and ; hence for the unique prime above , of residue degree .
For write , so , : , (as and ) and ; hence for the unique prime above , of residue degree .
For a prime the class of modulo is one of . If then , so by [F3] there are primes of degree , and by [F4] splits completely; if then the order is by [F5], so there are primes, each of residue degree .
Collecting steps 1.1 through 2.1: ; the primes and are ramified with a single prime each, of ; and every splits into four degree-one primes for the class , or two degree-two primes for the classes modulo .
Remarks
- Degree check. In every unramified case : four degree-one primes, or two degree-two primes, or (were the order ) one degree-four prime; the last case does not occur because has exponent .
- Ramified primes. and are exactly the prime divisors of the discriminant , consistent with the ramification criterion for the reduced index .
Quadratic Gauss sum at p=3
Example
For the standard complex primitive third root of unity , the quadratic Gauss sum is
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The prime , the primitive third root of unity , and the Gauss sum .
For every odd prime , , so here (Square of the quadratic Gauss sum).
The third roots of unity are for , so and (The -th roots of a complex number and the distinct roots of unity for every ).
Euler's formula holds for real (Euler's formula: for every real ), and , for real (Cofunction, supplementary, quarter-turn, and reflection identities for the six trigonometric functions); moreover for (Pi is the first positive zero of sine).
for real , so (, , and ).
Verification
Substituting the Legendre values, .
Since we have , and by [L5] also ; thus , using Euler's formula and the reflection identity.
From step 2.1, , while [L2] gives ; hence , and because , so .
Substituting back, , and , in agreement with the general square formula.
Remarks
- The choice of root matters for the sign. With the sum is ; replacing by multiplies by and gives . The square is the same in both cases.
Quadratic Gauss sum at p=5
Example
For the standard complex primitive fifth root of unity , the quadratic Gauss sum is and its Galois stabilizer is the subgroup of squares .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The prime , the primitive fifth root of unity , and the Gauss sum .
The nonzero squares modulo are and , so and ; hence (Quadratic Gauss sum in a prime cyclotomic field, The Legendre symbol, including its zero value).
For every not divisible by , the automorphism satisfies (Galois action on the quadratic Gauss sum).
The fifth roots of unity are , so and ; by Euler's formula (The -th roots of a complex number and the distinct roots of unity for every , Euler's formula: for every real ). Moreover , using the cofunction identity and positivity of sine on (Cofunction, supplementary, quarter-turn, and reflection identities for the six trigonometric functions, Pi is the first positive zero of sine).
for real (, , and ).
Verification
By [L1], .
Put . Then by [L5] and [L6].
Put . From we get , so ; therefore .
Moreover , so and ; since we have .
Substituting into step 2.1, , and this is consistent with the general theorem, which gives .
The stabilizer of under is the set of with , because and ; as the nonzero squares modulo are and , the stabilizer is .
Remarks
- Independence of the primitive root. Replacing by multiplies by , so the value is special to the standard positive-orientation root; the square and the generated field are unchanged.
- The stabilizer has index two. Its two elements are exactly the square classes, matching the description of the Galois group of the quadratic subfield of .
Quadratic subfield of Q(zeta_7)
Example
The unique intermediate field with is namely the field generated by the quadratic Gauss sum attached to a chosen primitive seventh root of unity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The odd prime , a fixed primitive seventh root of unity , the Gauss sum attached to it, and (Quadratic Gauss sum in a prime cyclotomic field, The cyclotomic extension as a splitting field of ).
For every odd prime , the unique intermediate field with is (Quadratic subfield generated by the Gauss sum).
For every odd prime , ; here in particular (Square of the quadratic Gauss sum).
, so . [arithmetic]
Verification
Substituting into gives .
By [F1] with , the unique degree-two intermediate field of is , where is the Gauss sum attached to the chosen primitive root .
By [F2] with , , so and the generator is indeed , in agreement with the identification of step 2.1.
Remarks
- The field is canonical, the generator is not. Replacing by another primitive seventh root multiplies by a sign , so the element is not canonical; the field it generates is, by the uniqueness clause of [F1]. This is the phenomenon recorded in the companion counterexample on the Gauss-sum sign.
- Discriminant form. , so is a fundamental discriminant. Since is cyclic of order , the field is the fixed field of its unique subgroup of order , and is a cyclic cubic extension.
Frobenius restriction for p=5 and q=3
Example
In the arithmetic Frobenius of the prime acts on the quadratic subfield by that is, nontrivially; the two Legendre symbols agree,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The distinct odd primes and , a fixed primitive fifth root of unity , the Gauss sum attached to it, and (Quadratic Gauss sum in a prime cyclotomic field).
For distinct odd primes , the arithmetic Frobenius of in acts on the quadratic subfield by , and (Quadratic reciprocity as a Frobenius restriction identity).
For one has and , so for some (Square of the quadratic Gauss sum). For the standard complex root one has ; moreover is the unique quadratic subfield of (Quadratic Gauss sum at p=5, Quadratic subfield generated by the Gauss sum).
Legendre symbols: because the nonzero squares modulo are and is not among them, and because and the only nonzero square modulo is (The Legendre symbol, including its zero value, Quadratic residues and nonresidues modulo an integer).
Verification
For the quadratic subfield is , with for some rational sign .
and .
By [F1] with , , the arithmetic Frobenius satisfies . Since it fixes , step 1.1 gives , hence . The restriction identity gives .
Since , one has , so the arithmetic Frobenius of acts nontrivially on : it is the nontrivial element of , and the two Legendre symbols both equal , in agreement with the reciprocity law .
Remarks
- Nontrivial restriction means non-splitting. The Frobenius of restricting nontrivially to is the Frobenius form of the statement that does not split in , equivalently .
- Reciprocity check. The equality is the special case , of Quadratic reciprocity as a Frobenius restriction identity; note is even, so the general reciprocity sign is , as displayed.
Second supplement in four residue classes modulo eight
Example
Let and , where denotes the positive real square root, so that is a quadratic subfield of . For an odd prime , the arithmetic Frobenius of acts on by with signs according as .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The primitive eighth root of unity , the element , and an odd prime .
has order , so . For every odd prime the arithmetic Frobenius of in is the power map , so it sends to , and (Second supplement from Frobenius on Q(zeta_8), Arithmetic Frobenius is the power map in an unramified cyclotomic field, The cyclotomic extension as a splitting field of ).
, hence , and ; consequently, for an odd integer the value depends only on modulo and equals for respectively. [algebra]
, and the exponent is an integer for odd , even exactly when (Second supplement from Frobenius on Q(zeta_8)).
Verification
For an odd prime the residue of modulo is one of ; by [F2] the four corresponding values of are , , and .
Since is induced by the -th power map on , step 1.1 gives for and for .
Comparing with [F1], for and for , matching the parity of described in [F3]; the signs in the order are .
Remarks
- A single sign computation covers all four classes. Only the residue of modulo enters, because makes the power map on depend on .
- is excluded. The second supplement concerns odd ; the prime is ramified in and does not arise as a Frobenius prime of an unramified extension.
The sign of a quadratic Gauss sum needs a chosen primitive root
Statement refuted
"For a fixed odd prime the quadratic Gauss sum is independent of the choice of the primitive -th root of unity used to define it, so that its sign is a function of alone."
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The prime , a primitive third root of unity with , the second primitive third root , and the Gauss sums and attached to them (Quadratic Gauss sum in a prime cyclotomic field).
In the cyclic group of third roots of unity the elements and are the two primitive third roots of unity, and (The -th roots of a complex number and the distinct roots of unity for every , The cyclotomic extension as a splitting field of ).
acts by for , so is an automorphism of and ( and ).
For every integer not divisible by , the automorphism of satisfies (Galois action on the quadratic Gauss sum); and while (The Legendre symbol, including its zero value).
For every odd prime , ; at this is , and the corresponding statement holds for because is again a primitive third root of unity (Square of the quadratic Gauss sum).
For an odd prime , is the unique intermediate field of of degree (Quadratic subfield generated by the Gauss sum); at this is .
For the standard complex root one has (Quadratic Gauss sum at p=3).
Counterexample
Replacing the primitive root by rewrites the attached Gauss sum as , where ; the two sums are formed from two different primitive third roots of unity of the same field.
: the nonzero square class modulo is , and is a nonresidue modulo .
By [F4], , so and ; in particular will mean .
Applying [F3] with gives , so the Gauss sum changes sign when the primitive root is replaced by its square.
Steps 1.3 and 2.1 show , yet and ; thus the square of the Gauss sum and the field it generates are unchanged, while the sign of the sum depends on the chosen primitive root. In the standard complex embedding, gives by [F6], while the same computation with gives ; the value differs and no root-independent sign is well defined.
Remarks
- What remains canonical. Only the square and the field are independent of the chosen primitive root; the element itself is determined only up to the sign of the automorphism relating two chosen roots.
- No contradiction with the analytic sign theorem. Statements that fix a standard complex root (or an embedding together with a root) do determine the sign, e.g. here; the counterexample only refutes root-independence.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Number Theory, Ch. 6, Remark 6.6
- Conrad-Landesman, Math 154 Algebraic Number Theory, Ch. 11, Remark 11.7
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Number Theory, Ch. 6, Proposition 6.2 and Remark 6.6(c)
- Conrad-Landesman, Math 154 Algebraic Number Theory, Chs. 10-12
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Number Theory, Ch. 6, Remark 6.6(c)
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Number Theory, Ch. 8, Example 8.18
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Number Theory, Ch. 6 and Ch. 8
- Conrad-Landesman, Math 154 Algebraic Number Theory, Chs. 10-11
- Jerry Shurman, Math 361 Ninth Lecture, sections 2-3
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Number Theory, Ch. 8, Example 8.19
- Jerry Shurman, Math 361 Ninth Lecture, section 4
- Jerry Shurman, Math 361 Ninth Lecture, sections 3-4
- Jerry Shurman, Math 361 Ninth Lecture, sections 2-4