Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 10 results · all verified · 7 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Cyclotomic Arithmetic and Reciprocity via Frobenius — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Concrete cyclotomic fields test each mechanism of the parent page. Q(ζ6)=Q(ζ3) shows the reduced-conductor correction that the unreduced displayed index 6 would obscure; Q(ζ5), Q(ζ8), and Q(ζ12) display total ramification, inert primes, and the four residue classes modulo eight and twelve that control splitting.

On the reciprocity side, the Gauss sums at p=3 and p=5 are evaluated explicitly (i3 and 5), Q(ζ7) exhibits the quadratic subfield Q(−7), and p=5,q=3 is worked through as the smallest nontrivial instance of the Frobenius restriction identity. A counterexample records that the sign of a Gauss sum changes with the chosen primitive root even though its square and its field do not.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

The reduced conductor of Q(zeta_6)

Example

Q(ζ6)=Q(ζ3), the conductor of this field is 3, and the rational prime 2 is unramified in it: 2OQ(ζ3) is prime, with residue degree 2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A primitive sixth root of unity ζ6 and a primitive third root of unity ζ3, with Q(ζ6) and Q(ζ3) the corresponding cyclotomic fields (The cyclotomic extension K(μn) as a splitting field of tn−1).

[F1]

For odd m, −ζm is a primitive 2m-th root of unity, so Q(ζ2m)=Q(ζm) (Conductor of a full cyclotomic field).

[F2]

The conductor of Q(ζn) is n when n is odd or 4∣n and is n/2 when n≡2(mod4) (Conductor of a full cyclotomic field, Cyclotomic conductor of a full cyclotomic field).

[F3]

Ramification criterion: for a cyclotomic field presented by its reduced index f, a rational prime ℓ ramifies if and only if ℓ∣f (Ramification primes of a reduced cyclotomic conductor).

[F4]

Unramified decomposition: if ℓ∤f for the reduced index f of Q(ζf), then every prime above ℓ has residue degree ord⁡f(ℓ) and there are φ(f)/ord⁡f(ℓ) of them (Decomposition of an unramified prime in a cyclotomic field).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1

Taking m=3 in [F1], −ζ3 is a primitive sixth root of unity, so Q(ζ6)=Q(ζ3).

1.2F2

By [F2] with n=6≡2(mod4), the conductor of Q(ζ6) is 6/2=3.

2.1F3F4step 1.1step 1.2∎

The reduced index of this field is 3, and 2∤3, so [F3] shows that 2 is unramified in Q(ζ6)=Q(ζ3); by [F4] with f=3, ℓ=2, the residue degree is ord⁡3(2)=2 and the number of primes above 2 is φ(3)/2=1, so 2O is prime of degree 2.

Remarks

  • Why the displayed index 6 is a trap. The index 6 is not reduced: an inference of the form "ℓ∣(displayed index)⇒ℓ ramifies" would wrongly make 2 ramified, since 2∣6; the actual conductor is 3, and 2∣3 fails. This is the exceptional shape excluded in the ramification criterion.
  • Frobenius viewpoint. Since ord⁡3(2)=2, the arithmetic Frobenius at 2 acts by ζ3↦ζ32 and has order 2, matching the single degree-two prime above 2.
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Arithmetic of Q(zeta_5)

Example

For K=Q(ζ5) one has OK=Z[ζ5] and dK=53=125. The prime 5 is totally ramified: (5)=(1−ζ5)4 is a fourth power of the unique prime above 5, whose residue field is F5. The prime 2 is unramified with a single prime above it of residue degree 4 (residue field F16) and trivial inertia group; and 11 splits completely into four degree-one primes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A primitive fifth root of unity ζ=ζ5 and K=Q(ζ), of degree φ(5)=4 (The cyclotomic extension K(μn) as a splitting field of tn−1).

[F1]

OK=Z[ζ], with integral basis 1,ζ,ζ2,ζ3 (Ring of integers of every cyclotomic field).

[F2]

Discriminant: for the reduced index f=5, dK=(−1)φ(5)/25φ(5)/∏p∣5pφ(5)/(p−1) (Signed discriminant of a cyclotomic field).

[F3]

Total ramification at a prime-power level: with λ=1−ζ, 5OK=(λ)φ(5)=(λ)4, and λOK is the unique prime of OK above 5, with residue field F5 (Total ramification at a prime-power cyclotomic level).

[F4]

Unramified decomposition: for the reduced index 5 and a prime ℓ∤5, every prime above ℓ has residue degree ord⁡5(ℓ) and there are φ(5)/ord⁡5(ℓ)=4/ord⁡5(ℓ) of them (Decomposition of an unramified prime in a cyclotomic field).

[F5]

Complete splitting: for ℓ∤5, the prime ℓ splits completely in K if and only if ℓ≡1(mod5) (Complete splitting criterion for a cyclotomic field).

[F6]

For finite Galois extensions the inertia group at a prime has order equal to the ramification exponent, ∣I(P/p)∣=e(P/p), and P is unramified over p if and only if its inertia group is trivial (Inertia group of a prime, Orders of decomposition and inertia groups).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F2

Since φ(5)=4, the discriminant formula gives dK=(−1)2⋅54/54/4=54/5=53=125.

1.2F4

The multiplicative order of 2 modulo 5 is 4: the powers of 2 modulo 5 are 2,4,3,1, so ord⁡5(2)=4.

1.3F5

The class 11≡1(mod5) is the identity of (Z/5)×.

1.4F3F6

By [F3], 5OK=(λ)4 with λOK the unique prime above 5 and residue field F5; its ramification exponent is 4=[K:Q], so 5 is totally ramified and its inertia group at λ has order 4, the full Galois group.

2.1F4F6step 1.2

By [F4] and step 1.2 applied with ℓ=2, there is exactly 4/4=1 prime above 2, of residue degree 4; its residue field has 24=16 elements, and since 2 is unramified its inertia group is trivial by [F6], so e=1,f=4,g=1 with efg=4=[K:Q].

2.2F5step 1.3

By [F5] and step 1.3, 11 splits completely in K: there are φ(5)=4 distinct primes above 11, each of ramification exponent 1 and residue degree 1.

3.1F1step 1.1step 1.4step 2.1step 2.2∎

Collecting the results: OK=Z[ζ5] with 1,ζ,ζ2,ζ3 an integral basis, dK=125, the prime 5 is totally ramified with (5)=(1−ζ)4, the prime 2 has one prime above it of residue degree 4 and trivial inertia, and 11 splits into four degree-one primes.

Remarks

  • Unramified decomposition has three cases. For a prime ℓ≠5, the orders modulo 5 are 1,2,4 for the classes 1,4,{2,3}, respectively. Thus [F4] gives four degree-one primes, two degree-two primes, or one degree-four prime. In particular 2 is inert, while 19≡4(mod5) gives two primes, each of residue degree 2.
  • Frobenius orders. The arithmetic Frobenius at 2 has order 4 and generates the full group (Z/5)×, while the Frobenius at 11 is trivial, which is complete splitting in the sense of Complete splitting criterion for a cyclotomic field.
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Prime decomposition in Q(zeta_8)

Example

For K=Q(ζ8) the discriminant is dK=28. Every odd rational prime is unramified; its residue degree is 1 if it is 1(mod8) and is 2 otherwise, with respectively four or two primes above it. In particular an odd prime splits completely in K exactly when it is 1(mod8).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A primitive eighth root of unity ζ8 and K=Q(ζ8), a reduced index since 4∣8 (The cyclotomic extension K(μn) as a splitting field of tn−1).

[F1]

Discriminant formula: for the reduced index f=8>1, dK=(−1)φ(8)/28φ(8)∏p∣8pφ(8)/(p−1) (Signed discriminant of a cyclotomic field).

[F2]

Unramified decomposition: for the reduced index 8 and a prime ℓ∤8, every prime above ℓ has residue degree ord⁡8(ℓ) and there are φ(8)/ord⁡8(ℓ)=4/ord⁡8(ℓ) of them (Decomposition of an unramified prime in a cyclotomic field).

[F3]

Complete splitting: for ℓ∤8, the prime ℓ splits completely in K if and only if ℓ≡1(mod8) (Complete splitting criterion for a cyclotomic field).

[F4]

φ(8)=4 and the unit group is (Z/8)×={1,3,5,7}; the class 1 has order 1, while 32≡52≡72≡1(mod8) with 3,5,7≢1(mod8), so those three classes have order 2 (The unit group (Z/n)× and Euler's totient φ(n)=∣(Z/n)×∣ for n≥1, The order ∣G∣ of a finite group and the order ord⁡(g) of an element, with ord⁡(g)=∞ when no positive power of g is the identity).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F4

Since φ(8)=4 and the only prime divisor of 8 is 2, the formula gives dK=(−1)2⋅84/24=4096/16=256=28.

1.2F4

For an odd prime ℓ the class of ℓ modulo 8 lies in {1,3,5,7}; by [F4] it has order 1 exactly for the class 1, and order 2 for the classes 3,5,7.

2.1F2F3step 1.2

By [F2] with ℓ odd, the primes above ℓ number 4/ord⁡8(ℓ) and each has residue degree ord⁡8(ℓ). Hence ℓ≡1(mod8) gives 4/1=4 primes of residue degree 1 (residue fields Fℓ), and by [F3] this is exactly the complete splitting condition; each of ℓ≡3,5,7(mod8) gives 4/2=2 primes, of residue degree 2 (residue fields Fℓ2).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Summary: dK=28, every odd prime is unramified, and its splitting type in K depends only on ℓ mod 8: four degree-one primes for ℓ≡1, two degree-two primes for ℓ≡3,5,7; in all cases efg=4=[K:Q].

Remarks

  • Only 2 ramifies. The discriminant 28 has the single prime divisor 2, and indeed 2∣8 with 8 reduced; this is the pair's ramification criterion at the conductor 8.
  • Relation to the second supplement. Since Q(ζ8) contains Q(2), the degree-two prime divisors of an odd ℓ≡3,5(mod8) refine the statement (2ℓ)=−1 of the second supplement; for ℓ≡1,7(mod8) the quadratic subfield splits.
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Prime decomposition in Q(zeta_12)

Example

For K=Q(ζ12) the discriminant is dK=144=24⋅32. The primes 2 and 3 each have a unique prime of OK above them, with e=f=2; and a rational prime ℓ∤12 splits into four primes of residue degree 1 when ℓ≡1(mod12), and into two primes of residue degree 2 when ℓ≡5,7,11(mod12).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A primitive twelfth root of unity ζ12 and K=Q(ζ12), a reduced index since 4∣12 (The cyclotomic extension K(μn) as a splitting field of tn−1).

[F1]

Discriminant formula: for a reduced index f>1 with K=Q(ζf), dK=(−1)φ(f)/2fφ(f)∏p∣fpφ(f)/(p−1) (Signed discriminant of a cyclotomic field).

[F2]

Prime factorisation: for the reduced index f=12, a rational prime ℓ, and f=ℓam with gcd⁡(ℓ,m)=1, one has ℓOK=(P1⋯Pg)e with e=φ(ℓa), d=ord⁡m(ℓ), g=φ(m)/d, and the Pi pairwise distinct primes of residue degree d (Prime factorisation in a cyclotomic field).

[F3]

For ℓ∤12 every prime above ℓ has residue degree ord⁡12(ℓ) and their number is φ(12)/ord⁡12(ℓ) (Decomposition of an unramified prime in a cyclotomic field).

[F4]

For ℓ∤12, the prime ℓ splits completely in K if and only if ℓ≡1(mod12) (Complete splitting criterion for a cyclotomic field).

[F5]

φ(12)=4, and the unit group is (Z/12)×={1,5,7,11}, in which every element has order 1 or 2: 1 has order 1, while 52≡72≡112≡1(mod12) with 5,7,11≢1(mod12) (The unit group (Z/n)× and Euler's totient φ(n)=∣(Z/n)×∣ for n≥1, The order ∣G∣ of a finite group and the order ord⁡(g) of an element, with ord⁡(g)=∞ when no positive power of g is the identity).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F5

The data φ(12)=4, 124=20736 and 24⋅32=16⋅9=144 give dK=(−1)2⋅20736/144=144=24⋅32.

1.2F2

For ℓ=2 write 12=22⋅3, so a=2, m=3: e=φ(4)=2, d=ord⁡3(2)=2 (as 22≡1 and 2≢1(mod3)) and g=φ(3)/2=1; hence 2OK=P2 for the unique prime above 2, of residue degree 2.

1.3F2

For ℓ=3 write 12=3⋅4, so a=1, m=4: e=φ(3)=2, d=ord⁡4(3)=2 (as 32≡1 and 3≢1(mod4)) and g=φ(4)/2=1; hence 3OK=P′2 for the unique prime above 3, of residue degree 2.

2.1F3F4F5step 1.1

For a prime ℓ∤12 the class of ℓ modulo 12 is one of 1,5,7,11. If ℓ≡1(mod12) then ord⁡12(ℓ)=1, so by [F3] there are φ(12)=4 primes of degree 1, and by [F4] ℓ splits completely; if ℓ≡5,7,11(mod12) then the order is 2 by [F5], so there are 4/2=2 primes, each of residue degree 2.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1∎

Collecting steps 1.1 through 2.1: dK=144; the primes 2 and 3 are ramified with a single prime each, of e=f=2; and every ℓ∤12 splits into four degree-one primes for the class 1, or two degree-two primes for the classes 5,7,11 modulo 12.

Remarks

  • Degree check. In every unramified case efg=φ(12)=4: four degree-one primes, or two degree-two primes, or (were the order 4) one degree-four prime; the last case does not occur because (Z/12)× has exponent 2.
  • Ramified primes. 2 and 3 are exactly the prime divisors of the discriminant dK=144, consistent with the ramification criterion for the reduced index 12.
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Quadratic Gauss sum at p=3

Example

For the standard complex primitive third root of unity ζ3=e2πi/3, the quadratic Gauss sum is τ3=ζ3−ζ32=i3,τ32=−3.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The prime p=3, the primitive third root of unity ζ=ζ3=e2πi/3, and the Gauss sum τ=τ3=∑a mod 3(a/3)ζa.

[L1]

(1/3)=1 and (2/3)=−1, so τ=(1/3)ζ+(2/3)ζ2=ζ−ζ2 (Quadratic Gauss sum in a prime cyclotomic field, The Legendre symbol, including its zero value).

[L2]

For every odd prime p, τp2=p∗=(−1)(p−1)/2p, so here τ2=−3 (Square of the quadratic Gauss sum).

[L3]

The third roots of unity are ζk=exp⁡(2πik/3) for k=0,1,2, so ζ=exp⁡(2πi/3) and ζ3=1 (The n-th roots of a complex number and the n distinct roots of unity for every n≥1).

[L4]

Euler's formula exp⁡(iθ)=cos⁡θ+isin⁡θ holds for real θ (Euler's formula: exp⁡(iθ)=cos⁡θ+isin⁡θ for every real θ), and sin⁡(−x)=−sin⁡x, sin⁡(π−x)=sin⁡x for real x (Cofunction, supplementary, quarter-turn, and reflection identities for the six trigonometric functions); moreover sin⁡x>0 for 0<x<π (Pi is the first positive zero of sine).

[L5]

∣exp⁡(iθ)∣=1 for real θ, so ζ‾=ζ−1 (exp⁡(x+iy)=ex(cos⁡y+isin⁡y), ∣exp⁡(x+iy)∣=ex, and eiπ+1=0).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1

Substituting the Legendre values, τ=ζ−ζ2.

2.1L3L4L5step 1.1

Since ζ3=1 we have ζ2=ζ−1, and by [L5] also ζ2=ζ‾; thus τ=ζ−ζ−1=exp⁡(2πi/3)−exp⁡(−2πi/3)=2isin⁡(2π/3)=2isin⁡(π/3), using Euler's formula and the reflection identity.

3.1L2L4step 2.1

From step 2.1, τ2=(2isin⁡(π/3))2=−4sin⁡2(π/3), while [L2] gives τ2=−3; hence sin⁡2(π/3)=3/4, and sin⁡(π/3)>0 because 0<π/3<π, so sin⁡(π/3)=3/2.

4.1L2step 2.1step 3.1∎

Substituting back, τ=2i⋅(3/2)=i3, and τ2=(i3)2=−3, in agreement with the general square formula.

Remarks

  • The choice of root matters for the sign. With ζ3=e2πi/3 the sum is +i3; replacing ζ3 by ζ32 multiplies τ3 by (2/3)=−1 and gives −i3. The square −3 is the same in both cases.
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Quadratic Gauss sum at p=5

Example

For the standard complex primitive fifth root of unity ζ5=e2πi/5, the quadratic Gauss sum is τ5=ζ5−ζ52−ζ53+ζ54=5, and its Galois stabilizer { b∈(Z/5)×:σb(τ5)=τ5 } is the subgroup of squares {1,4}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The prime p=5, the primitive fifth root of unity ζ=ζ5=e2πi/5, and the Gauss sum τ=τ5=∑a mod 5(a/5)ζa.

[L1]

The nonzero squares modulo 5 are 1 and 4, so (1/5)=(4/5)=1 and (2/5)=(3/5)=−1; hence τ=ζ−ζ2−ζ3+ζ4 (Quadratic Gauss sum in a prime cyclotomic field, The Legendre symbol, including its zero value).

[L2]

τ2=p∗=(−1)(5−1)/25=5 (Square of the quadratic Gauss sum).

[L3]

For every b not divisible by 5, the automorphism σb(ζ)=ζb satisfies σb(τ)=(b/5)τ (Galois action on the quadratic Gauss sum).

[L5]

The fifth roots of unity are ζk=exp⁡(2πik/5), so ζ=exp⁡(2πi/5) and ζ4=ζ−1; by Euler's formula ζ+ζ−1=2cos⁡(2π/5) (The n-th roots of a complex number and the n distinct roots of unity for every n≥1, Euler's formula: exp⁡(iθ)=cos⁡θ+isin⁡θ for every real θ). Moreover cos⁡(2π/5)=sin⁡(π/2−2π/5)=sin⁡(π/10)>0, using the cofunction identity and positivity of sine on (0,π) (Cofunction, supplementary, quarter-turn, and reflection identities for the six trigonometric functions, Pi is the first positive zero of sine).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1

By [L1], τ=ζ−ζ2−ζ3+ζ4.

1.2L5L6

Put t:=ζ+ζ4=ζ+ζ−1. Then t=2cos⁡(2π/5)>0 by [L5] and [L6].

2.1L4step 1.1step 1.2

Put s:=ζ2+ζ3=ζ2+ζ−2. From Φ5(ζ)=0 we get 1+t+s=0, so s=−1−t; therefore τ=t−s=t−(−1−t)=1+2t.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1

Moreover t2=(ζ+ζ−1)2=ζ2+2+ζ−2=s+2=1−t, so t2+t−1=0 and t=−1±52; since t>0 we have t=5−12.

4.1L2step 2.1step 3.1

Substituting into step 2.1, τ=1+2t=1+(5−1)=5, and this is consistent with the general theorem, which gives τ2=5.

5.1L3step 4.1∎

The stabilizer of τ under σb is the set of b with (b/5)=1, because σb(τ)=(b/5)τ and τ=5≠0; as the nonzero squares modulo 5 are 1 and 4, the stabilizer is {1,4}.

Remarks

  • Independence of the primitive root. Replacing ζ5 by ζ5 b multiplies τ5 by (b/5), so the value 5 is special to the standard positive-orientation root; the square and the generated field are unchanged.
  • The stabilizer has index two. Its two elements are exactly the square classes, matching the description of the Galois group of the quadratic subfield Q(5) of Q(ζ5).
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Quadratic subfield of Q(zeta_7)

Example

The unique intermediate field Q⊆F⊆Q(ζ7) with [F:Q]=2 is F=Q(−7), namely the field generated by the quadratic Gauss sum τ7 attached to a chosen primitive seventh root of unity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The odd prime p=7, a fixed primitive seventh root of unity ζ=ζ7, the Gauss sum τ=τ7=∑a mod 7(a/7)ζa attached to it, and p∗=(−1)(p−1)/2p (Quadratic Gauss sum in a prime cyclotomic field, The cyclotomic extension K(μn) as a splitting field of tn−1).

[F1]

For every odd prime p, the unique intermediate field Q⊆F⊆Q(ζp) with [F:Q]=2 is Q(τp)=Q(p∗) (Quadratic subfield generated by the Gauss sum).

[F2]

For every odd prime p, τp2=p∗; here in particular τ2=p∗ (Square of the quadratic Gauss sum).

[F3]

(7−1)/2=3, so p∗=(−1)3⋅7=−7. [arithmetic]

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F3

Substituting p=7 into p∗=(−1)(p−1)/2p gives p∗=(−1)3⋅7=−7.

2.1step 1.1F1

By [F1] with p=7, the unique degree-two intermediate field of Q(ζ7)/Q is Q(τ7)=Q(p∗)=Q(−7), where τ7 is the Gauss sum attached to the chosen primitive root ζ7.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1∎

By [F2] with p=7, τ2=−7, so τ=±−7 and the generator Q(τ) is indeed Q(−7), in agreement with the identification of step 2.1.

Remarks

  • The field is canonical, the generator is not. Replacing ζ7 by another primitive seventh root multiplies τ7 by a sign ±1, so the element τ7 is not canonical; the field Q(−7) it generates is, by the uniqueness clause of [F1]. This is the phenomenon recorded in the companion counterexample on the Gauss-sum sign.
  • Discriminant form. −7≡1(mod4), so −7 is a fundamental discriminant. Since Gal⁡(Q(ζ7)/Q)≅(Z/7)× is cyclic of order 6, the field Q(−7) is the fixed field of its unique subgroup of order 3, and Q(ζ7)/Q(−7) is a cyclic cubic extension.
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Frobenius restriction for p=5 and q=3

Example

In Q(ζ5) the arithmetic Frobenius of the prime 3 acts on the quadratic subfield Q(5) by Frob⁡3(5)=−5, that is, nontrivially; the two Legendre symbols agree, (35)=(53)=−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The distinct odd primes p=5 and q=3, a fixed primitive fifth root of unity ζ5, the Gauss sum τ5 attached to it, and p∗=(−1)(p−1)/2p (Quadratic Gauss sum in a prime cyclotomic field).

[F1]

For distinct odd primes p,q, the arithmetic Frobenius of q in Q(ζp) acts on the quadratic subfield Q(p∗) by τp↦(p∗q)τp, and (p∗q)=(qp) (Quadratic reciprocity as a Frobenius restriction identity).

[F2]

For p=5 one has p∗=(−1)2⋅5=5 and τ52=5, so τ5=ε5 for some ε∈{1,−1} (Square of the quadratic Gauss sum). For the standard complex root ζ5=e2πi/5 one has ε=1; moreover Q(τ5)=Q(5) is the unique quadratic subfield of Q(ζ5) (Quadratic Gauss sum at p=5, Quadratic subfield generated by the Gauss sum).

[F3]

Legendre symbols: (35)=−1 because the nonzero squares modulo 5 are 1,4 and 3 is not among them, and (53)=(23)=−1 because 5≡2(mod3) and the only nonzero square modulo 3 is 1 (The Legendre symbol, including its zero value, Quadratic residues and nonresidues modulo an integer).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F2

For p=5 the quadratic subfield is Q(p∗)=Q(5)=Q(τ5), with τ5=ε5≠0 for some rational sign ε∈{1,−1}.

1.2F3

(35)=−1 and (53)=(23)=−1.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2

By [F1] with p=5, q=3, the arithmetic Frobenius satisfies Frob⁡3(τ5)=(53)τ5=−τ5. Since it fixes ε∈Q, step 1.1 gives εFrob⁡3(5)=−ε5, hence Frob⁡3(5)=−5. The restriction identity gives (53)=(35)=−1.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Since τ5≠0, one has Frob⁡3(τ5)=−τ5≠τ5, so the arithmetic Frobenius of 3 acts nontrivially on Q(5): it is the nontrivial element of Gal⁡(Q(5)/Q), and the two Legendre symbols both equal −1, in agreement with the reciprocity law (3/5)(5/3)=(−1)2⋅1=1.

Remarks

  • Nontrivial restriction means non-splitting. The Frobenius of 3 restricting nontrivially to Q(5) is the Frobenius form of the statement that 3 does not split in Q(5), equivalently (53)=−1.
  • Reciprocity check. The equality (53)=(35) is the special case p=5, q=3 of Quadratic reciprocity as a Frobenius restriction identity; note (p−1)(q−1)/4=2⋅1=2 is even, so the general reciprocity sign is +1, as displayed.
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02Open item page →

Second supplement in four residue classes modulo eight

Example

Let ζ=ζ8=eπi/4 and t=ζ+ζ−1=2, where 2 denotes the positive real square root, so that Q(2) is a quadratic subfield of Q(ζ8). For an odd prime q, the arithmetic Frobenius of q acts on 2 by Frob⁡q(2)=(2q)2=(−1)(q2−1)/82, with signs +,−,−,+ according as q≡1,3,5,7(mod8).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The primitive eighth root of unity ζ=eπi/4, the element t=ζ+ζ−1, and an odd prime q.

[F1]

ζ2=ζ4 has order 4, so t2=2. For every odd prime q the arithmetic Frobenius of q in Q(ζ8) is the power map ζ↦ζq, so it sends t=ζ+ζ−1 to ζq+ζ−q, and Frob⁡q(t)=(2q)t=(−1)(q2−1)/8t (Second supplement from Frobenius on Q(zeta_8), Arithmetic Frobenius is the power map in an unramified cyclotomic field, The cyclotomic extension K(μn) as a splitting field of tn−1).

[F2]

ζ4=−1, hence ζ7=ζ−1, ζ3=−ζ−1 and ζ5=ζ4ζ=−ζ; consequently, for an odd integer m the value ζm depends only on m modulo 8 and equals ζ,−1⋅ζ−1,−ζ,ζ−1 for m≡1,3,5,7(mod8) respectively. [algebra]

[F3]

(2/q)=(−1)(q2−1)/8, and the exponent (q2−1)/8 is an integer for odd q, even exactly when q≡±1(mod8) (Second supplement from Frobenius on Q(zeta_8)).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F2

For an odd prime q the residue of q modulo 8 is one of 1,3,5,7; by [F2] the four corresponding values of ζq+ζ−q are ζ+ζ−1=t, −ζ−1−ζ=−t, −ζ−ζ−1=−t and ζ−1+ζ=t.

2.1F1step 1.1

Since Frob⁡q(t)=ζq+ζ−q is induced by the q-th power map on ζ, step 1.1 gives Frob⁡q(t)=+t for q≡1,7(mod8) and Frob⁡q(t)=−t for q≡3,5(mod8).

3.1F1F3step 2.1∎

Comparing with [F1], (2q)=+1 for q≡1,7(mod8) and (2q)=−1 for q≡3,5(mod8), matching the parity of (q2−1)/8 described in [F3]; the signs in the order q≡1,3,5,7 are +,−,−,+.

Remarks

  • A single sign computation covers all four classes. Only the residue of q modulo 8 enters, because ζ4=−1 makes the power map on ζ depend on q mod 8.
  • q=2 is excluded. The second supplement concerns odd q; the prime q=2 is ramified in Q(ζ8) and does not arise as a Frobenius prime of an unramified extension.
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02Open item page →

The sign of a quadratic Gauss sum needs a chosen primitive root

Statement refuted

"For a fixed odd prime p the quadratic Gauss sum τp is independent of the choice of the primitive p-th root of unity used to define it, so that its sign is a function of p alone."

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The prime p=3, a primitive third root of unity ζ with ζ≠1, the second primitive third root ζ′:=ζ2, and the Gauss sums τ=∑a mod 3(a/3)ζa and τ′=∑a mod 3(a/3)(ζ′)a attached to them (Quadratic Gauss sum in a prime cyclotomic field).

[F1]

In the cyclic group μ3 of third roots of unity the elements ζ and ζ2 are the two primitive third roots of unity, and Q(ζ′)=Q(ζ) (The n-th roots of a complex number and the n distinct roots of unity for every n≥1, The cyclotomic extension K(μn) as a splitting field of tn−1).

[F2]

Gal⁡(Q(ζ)/Q)≅(Z/3)× acts by σb(ζ)=ζb for b=1,2, so σ2 is an automorphism of Q(ζ) and σ2(ζ)=ζ2=ζ′ ([Q(ζn):Q]=φ(n) and Gal⁡(Q(μn)/Q)≅(Z/n)×).

[F3]

For every integer b not divisible by 3, the automorphism σb of Q(ζ) satisfies σb(τ)=(b/3)τ (Galois action on the quadratic Gauss sum); and (2/3)=−1 while (1/3)=1 (The Legendre symbol, including its zero value).

[F4]

For every odd prime p, τp2=p∗=(−1)(p−1)/2p; at p=3 this is τ2=−3, and the corresponding statement holds for τ′ because ζ′ is again a primitive third root of unity (Square of the quadratic Gauss sum).

[F5]

For an odd prime p, Q(τp)=Q(p∗) is the unique intermediate field of Q(ζp)/Q of degree 2 (Quadratic subfield generated by the Gauss sum); at p=3 this is Q(τ)=Q(τ′)=Q(−3)=Q(ζ).

[F6]

For the standard complex root ζ3=e2πi/3 one has τ3=ζ3−ζ32=i3 (Quadratic Gauss sum at p=3).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1F1F2

Replacing the primitive root ζ by ζ′=ζ2 rewrites the attached Gauss sum as τ′=∑a mod 3(a/3)(ζ2)a=∑a mod 3(a/3)σ2(ζ)a=σ2(τ), where σ2∈Gal⁡(Q(ζ)/Q); the two sums are formed from two different primitive third roots of unity of the same field.

1.2F3

(2/3)=−1: the nonzero square class modulo 3 is 1, and 2≡−1 is a nonresidue modulo 3.

1.3F4

By [F4], τ2=(τ′)2=−3≠0, so τ≠0 and τ′≠0; in particular τ′=−τ will mean τ′≠τ.

2.1F3step 1.1step 1.2

Applying [F3] with b=2 gives τ′=σ2(τ)=(2/3)τ=−τ, so the Gauss sum changes sign when the primitive root is replaced by its square.

3.1F5F6step 1.3step 2.1∎

Steps 1.3 and 2.1 show τ′≠τ, yet τ′2=τ2=−3 and Q(τ′)=Q(τ)=Q(−3); thus the square of the Gauss sum and the field it generates are unchanged, while the sign of the sum depends on the chosen primitive root. In the standard complex embedding, ζ=e2πi/3 gives τ=i3 by [F6], while the same computation with ζ′=ζ2 gives τ′=−i3; the value differs and no root-independent sign is well defined.

Remarks

  • What remains canonical. Only the square τp2=p∗ and the field Q(τp)=Q(p∗) are independent of the chosen primitive root; the element itself is determined only up to the sign (b/p) of the automorphism relating two chosen roots.
  • No contradiction with the analytic sign theorem. Statements that fix a standard complex root ζp=e2πi/p (or an embedding together with a root) do determine the sign, e.g. τ3=i3 here; the counterexample only refutes root-independence.

Sources