How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
and
Statement
Let and let be a primitive -th root of unity (The group of -th roots of unity in a field, and primitive -th roots of unity) in (The cyclotomic extension as a splitting field of ). Then
(The degree of a finite field extension, The unit group and Euler's totient for ), and the embedding
of is Galois and embeds its Galois group into is an isomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer ; is an ordered field (The rationals form a totally ordered field), so (The characteristic of a ring: the least with when one exists, and otherwise) and divides no (Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
is irreducible in for every ( is irreducible in for every ).
For a field with and a primitive -th root of unity in a splitting field, irreducibility of the image of in , the equality , and surjectivity of the embedding are equivalent ( is irreducible over exactly when , exactly when the embedding into is onto).
Proof
Since does not divide , [L2] applies with .
The image of in is itself, irreducible by [L1]; so the first clause of [L2] holds, and therefore so do the other two: , and the embedding is onto, hence an isomorphism, being injective.
Remarks
- The isomorphism is canonical. It sends to the class of the exponent with , and is Galois and embeds its Galois group into shows that class does not depend on which primitive -th root of unity is chosen. So every subgroup of names an intermediate field of without any choice being made.
Depends on
- $\Phi_n$ is irreducible in $\mathbb Q[t]$ for every $n\ge1$
- $\Phi_n$ is irreducible over $K$ exactly when $[K(\zeta_n):K]=\varphi(n)$, exactly when the embedding into $(\mathbb Z/n)^\times$ is onto
- $K(\mu_n)/K$ is Galois and $\sigma\mapsto a_\sigma$ embeds its Galois group into $(\mathbb Z/n)^\times$
- The cyclotomic extension $K(\mu_n)$ as a splitting field of $t^{n}-1$
- The unit group $(\mathbb{Z}/n)^\times$ and Euler's totient $\varphi(n)=\lvert(\mathbb{Z}/n)^\times\rvert$ for $n\ge1$
- The degree $[K:F]=\dim_F K$ of a finite field extension
- The group $\mu_n(K)$ of $n$-th roots of unity in a field, and primitive $n$-th roots of unity
- The rationals form a totally ordered field
- The characteristic of a ring: the least $n \ge 1$ with $n \cdot 1_R = 0$ when one exists, and $0$ otherwise
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
Used by
- For an odd prime p, ℚ(ζₚ) has exactly one intermediate field of degree two over ℚ Corollary
- A degree-three Galois extension of ℚ inside ℚ(ζ₇) Example
- Gal(ℚ(ζ₁₂)/ℚ)≅(ℤ/12)^× and its three quadratic subfields Example
- FALSE: every finite abelian group is Gal(ℚ(μₙ)/ℚ) for some n False statement
- FALSE: μₙ(K) has n elements in every field K False statement
- Every intermediate field of ℚ(μₙ)/ℚ is Galois over ℚ with abelian Galois group Proposition
- Recorded, not proved: every finite abelian extension of ℚ lies in a cyclotomic field Remark
- Every finite abelian group is the Galois group of some finite Galois extension of ℚ Theorem
- ℚ(μₘ)∩ℚ(μₙ)=ℚ(μ_gcd(m,n)) Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. L. Clark, Field Theory (course notes/monograph), Corollary 9.9 (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Conrad, Cyclotomic Extensions (expository blurb), Theorem 2.5 (standard reference, not scraped)