How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Identical distribution without independence can defeat the mean law
Statement refuted
Identical integrable marginals alone do not imply the strong mean law: on with equal masses, set and for every n.
Counterexample
Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.
The law gives each atom mass 1/2 and has total mass one. Every coordinate has this same law, and . It is integrable since ||<=1.
For every n, at both points. Hence everywhere, and convergence to the common mean fails on the whole space. Independence fails as well: .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, §§2.4–2.5, pp. 76–87 (standard reference, not scraped)