Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strong Laws of Large Numbers — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples calculate empirical frequencies, an integrable heavy-tail mean, and a nonidentical variance-series law. The counterexamples separate weak and strong sample-mean convergence, show the obstruction from Cauchy tails, and exhibit failure without independence.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Almost sure frequency of heads

Example

Assume AC and 0p1. On the countable product of the law P({1})=p, P({0})=1p, the proportion of the first n coordinates x0,,xn1 that equal one converges almost surely to p.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Variance and covariance identities for random variables: Let X,Y be square-integrable real random variables on one probability space. Then Var(X)=E[X2]E[X]2, Cov(X,Y)=E[XY]E[X]E[Y]. Moreover, covariance is symmetric and bilinear on finite linear combinations. On finite full-power-set probability spaces these formulas reduce to the published finite identities.

[F2]

The Axiom of Choice: The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement.

Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (def-choice-function).

Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)S for all SF.

An equivalent formulation is that a product of nonempty sets is nonempty: if Xi for every iI, then iIXi. Here iIXi is the set of functions f with domain I such that f(i)Xi for every iI; when a family of nonempty sets is indexed by itself, such an f is precisely a choice function for it.

[F3]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): The Axiom of Countable Choice, written ACω, is the following statement.

For every family (Xn)nN of nonempty sets indexed by N there is a function f with domain N such that f(n)Xn for every nN.

Equivalently, in the vocabulary of def-choice-function: every at most countable family of nonempty sets (def-countable) has a choice function.

[F4]

The recursion theorem: Let (N,0,σ) be a Peano system (def-peano-system), in particular the natural numbers N (def-natural-numbers). For any set A, any element aA, and any function f:AA, there is a unique function g:NA such that g(0)=a and g(σ(n))=f(g(n)) for all nN.

[F5]

The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain: Let X be a set and let RX×X be a binary relation on X. Call R entire on X when

for every xX there is yX with xRy.

The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written DC, is the following statement.

For every nonempty set X, every relation R entire on X, and every aX, there is a function x:NX (def-function, def-natural-numbers) with x0=aandxnRxn+1  for every nN.

Here a sequence in X means a function from N to X, not necessarily a real-valued sequence. As everywhere in this library N contains 0, and the sequence is indexed from 0; the term x0 is the prescribed starting point a and every later term is related to its predecessor.

What DC adds to what came before. def-choice-function and def-axiom-of-choice select one element from each member of a family that is fixed in advance, and def-countable-choice does the same for a family indexed by N. In both, the family is given before any selection is made. DC is the principle needed when the n-th set to select from is not known until the first n selections have been made: here the admissible values of xn+1 are exactly the R-successors of xn, so the family being chosen from is built along the choosing. That is precisely the situation ACω does not cover, and it is why a construction "pick xn+1 depending on xn, for every n at once" is not licensed by countable choice.

The starting point may be dropped. The formally weaker statement obtained by deleting the clause x0=a — for every nonempty X and every entire R there is a sequence with xnRxn+1 for all n — is an immediate consequence of the form above, since X is nonempty and any of its elements may be taken as a. The reverse derivation is standard and is not needed anywhere in this library, so it is not carried out; every use below prescribes x0.

R need not be an order and the terms need not be distinct. What DC delivers is a sequence, that is a function NX, not a chain in the order-theoretic sense (def-chain). The relation may be symmetric, and the sequence may repeat a value or be constant; all that is asserted is xnRxn+1 at every index.

[F6]

Assuming countable and dependent choice, countable products of arbitrary probability spaces: Assume countable choice and dependent choice. For probability spaces (En,En,μn)nN there is a unique probability measure on the canonical countable-product sigma-algebra having the prescribed finite product marginals.

[F7]

Coordinate random elements of a countable product are independent: Under the measure of F6, the coordinate maps Xn(x)=xn have laws μn and are independent.

[F8]

Iid finite variance strong law: IID square-integrable real variables satisfy Sn/nEX1 almost surely.

Verification

Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.

1.1

The two nonnegative masses sum to one; summing them over subsets of {0,1} gives a countably additive probability measure. Its identity variable has EX=p, EX2=p, and hence Var(X)=pp2 by F1.

F1
2.1

Under F2, applying a choice function to a countable nonempty family gives F3. For each entire relation R choose a successor s(a) for every a; F4 produces the iterates of s from a prescribed initial point, proving F5. Thus F6 constructs the canonical countable product and F7 makes its coordinate maps independent with the law in step 1.1. For n1, put Yn(x)=xn1; then (Yn)n1 is IID with that law.

F2F3F4F5F6F7step 1.1
3.1

F8 applies to (Yn)n1 using the finite variance in step 1.1 and independence in step 2.1. Since k=1nYk counts the ones among x0,,xn1, it yields the displayed frequency limit. If p=0 or p=1, each coordinate equals that value almost surely, and a countable union of zero-probability exceptions is null.

F8step 1.1step 2.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Strong law for empirical indicator averages

Example

For IID random elements (Xn) and a fixed measurable A, n1kn1A(Xk)P(X1A) almost surely. A single conull event works for any specified countable class of sets A.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence: Let (Xi)iI be an independent family of random elements Xi:(Ω,F,P)(Si,Σi). For each i, let gi:(Si,Σi)(Ti,Ti) be measurable. Then the family (giXi)iI is independent.

[F2]

The expectation of an indicator is the probability of the event: Let (Ω,F,P) be a probability space and let AF. Then the indicator 1A satisfies E[1A]=P(A).

[F3]

Kolmogorov iid l1 strong law: For IID real (Xn)n1 with EX1<, Sn/nμ=EX1 almost surely.

[F4]

Finite and countable subadditivity of measures: Let μ be a measure and let (Ek)kN be measurable. Then

μ(kNEk)k=0μ(Ek).

For every mN one also has

μ(k<mEk)k<mμ(Ek),

including m=0, where both sides are 0.

Verification

Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.

1.1

The measurable maps x1A(x) take values in {0,1}. F1 preserves the IID property, and F2 computes their expectation as pA=P(X1A); their absolute expectations are at most one.

F1F2
2.1

F3 applied to step 1.1 gives the fixed-set limit. For a specified countable class, let N_A be the failure event for that limit. F4 gives P(ANA)A0=0. Outside this union every stated frequency converges simultaneously.

F3F4step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Strong law estimator of an integrable mean

Example

Assume AC. The probability law with F(x)=0 for x<1 and F(x)=1x3/2 for x1 has density ρ(x)=(3/2)x5/21[1,)(x), mean 3 and infinite second moment. The sample means of IID copies converge almost surely to 3.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers: For a>0, the function xax is continuous on R and (ax)=axloga. For αR, the function xxα is continuous and differentiable on (0,), with (xα)=αxα1.

[F2]

Probability laws correspond to distribution functions: Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice.

  1. Let X be a real random variable, let PX be its law, and let FX(x)=P(Xx). Then FX is nondecreasing and right-continuous, satisfies limxFX(x)=0,limx+FX(x)=1, and obeys PX((a,b])=FX(b)FX(a)(a<b).
  2. Conversely, if F:RR is nondecreasing and right-continuous with limxF(x)=0,limx+F(x)=1, then there is a unique Borel probability measure μ on R such that μ((a,b])=F(b)F(a)(a<b), equivalently F(x)=μ((,x])(xR).
[F3]

The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure: Let f:X[0,+] be measurable and define νf(A):=Afdμ(AA). Then νf is a measure on (X,A).

[F4]

A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion: Let a<b be reals and let f:[a,b]R be continuous on [a,b] (def-continuity-real). Then f is bounded (def-bounded-set) and Riemann integrable on [a,b] (def-darboux-integral).

The proof gives more than integrability: it gives a partition that works. For every real ε>0 the uniform partition into N parts already satisfies U(f,P)L(f,P)<ε, as soon as N is large enough that (ba)/N is below the δ that uniform continuity supplies for ε/(2(ba)). Uniform continuity is exactly what makes one δ serve all N subintervals at once, and it is the only place where the compactness of [a,b] is used.

[F5]

The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G=f and f is integrable, then abf=G(b)G(a): Let a<b be reals, let G:[a,b]R be differentiable at every point of [a,b] as a function on [a,b] (def-derivative; at a and b this is the one-sided derivative), let f:=G, and suppose f is integrable on [a,b] (def-darboux-integral). Then

abf  =  G(b)G(a).

Both hypotheses are needed and neither is removable. A function may be differentiable everywhere with G not integrable — then the left-hand side does not exist (an everywhere differentiable function with unbounded derivative) — and an integrable f need not be the derivative of anything (the sign function); both witnesses are on the companion page.

No continuity of f is assumed, which is what makes this the working form: the theorem evaluates abf for every integrable derivative, not only for continuous integrands.

[F6]

A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral: Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let a<b and let f:[a,b]R be bounded and Riemann integrable. Then f is Lebesgue measurable on [a,b] and is integrable there, and its Lebesgue integral equals its Riemann integral: [a,b]fdλ1=abf(x)dx.

This is the point at which the completeness of Lebesgue measure is used essentially: the proof obtains a Borel function equal to f almost everywhere, and measurability of f itself is then a completeness statement.

[F7]

Monotone convergence for the integral: Let 0f1f2 be measurable and suppose fn(x)f(x) for every x. Then fndμfdμ.

[F8]

Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system: Let P be a π-system on X generating A, and let μ,ν be measures on (X,A) that agree on P. Suppose there is an increasing sequence (Pn) in P with

X=nPn,μ(Pn)=ν(Pn)<+(nN).

Then μ=ν on A.

[F9]

Layer-cake formulas for random variables: Let (Ω,F,P) be a probability space.

  1. If X:Ω[0,+] is measurable, then E[X]=0P(X>t)dt, where the right-hand side may be +.
  2. If X is an integrable real random variable, then E[X]=0P(X>t)dt0P(X<t)dt.
[F10]

For 0 < p < infinity, the layer-cake formula computes the integral of |f|^p from the distribution function: Let (X,A,μ) be a measure space, let f:XC be measurable, and let 0<p<. Then Xfpdμ=p0tp1μ({f>t})dt=p0tp1Af(t)dt, where either side may be +.

[F11]

The recursion theorem: Let (N,0,σ) be a Peano system (def-peano-system), in particular the natural numbers N (def-natural-numbers). For any set A, any element aA, and any function f:AA, there is a unique function g:NA such that g(0)=a and g(σ(n))=f(g(n)) for all nN.

[F12]

The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain: Let X be a set and let RX×X be a binary relation on X. Call R entire on X when

for every xX there is yX with xRy.

The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written DC, is the following statement.

For every nonempty set X, every relation R entire on X, and every aX, there is a function x:NX (def-function, def-natural-numbers) with x0=aandxnRxn+1  for every nN.

Here a sequence in X means a function from N to X, not necessarily a real-valued sequence. As everywhere in this library N contains 0, and the sequence is indexed from 0; the term x0 is the prescribed starting point a and every later term is related to its predecessor.

What DC adds to what came before. def-choice-function and def-axiom-of-choice select one element from each member of a family that is fixed in advance, and def-countable-choice does the same for a family indexed by N. In both, the family is given before any selection is made. DC is the principle needed when the n-th set to select from is not known until the first n selections have been made: here the admissible values of xn+1 are exactly the R-successors of xn, so the family being chosen from is built along the choosing. That is precisely the situation ACω does not cover, and it is why a construction "pick xn+1 depending on xn, for every n at once" is not licensed by countable choice.

The starting point may be dropped. The formally weaker statement obtained by deleting the clause x0=a — for every nonempty X and every entire R there is a sequence with xnRxn+1 for all n — is an immediate consequence of the form above, since X is nonempty and any of its elements may be taken as a. The reverse derivation is standard and is not needed anywhere in this library, so it is not carried out; every use below prescribes x0.

R need not be an order and the terms need not be distinct. What DC delivers is a sequence, that is a function NX, not a chain in the order-theoretic sense (def-chain). The relation may be symmetric, and the sequence may repeat a value or be constant; all that is asserted is xnRxn+1 at every index.

[F13]

Countably many independent copies of a prescribed law exist: Assume countable choice and dependent choice. Every probability measure ν on (S,Σ) is the common law of a countable independent family of S-valued random elements.

[F14]

Kolmogorov iid l1 strong law: For IID real (Xn)n1 with EX1<, Sn/nμ=EX1 almost surely.

Verification

Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.

1.1

F1 makes F continuous at 1 and on each side, nondecreasing, and gives its limits 0 and 1 at infinity. AC implies CC by choosing from each member of a countable nonempty family, so F2 constructs its unique probability law.

F1F2
2.1

The displayed nonnegative Borel density defines a measure by F3. On [1,R], F4 and F5 with primitive x3/2 give 1Rρ(x)dx=1R3/2. F6 applies under the CC from step 1.1. F7 extends these nonnegative compact integrals to total mass one. The same calculation on every interval gives the increments of F; F8 on finite intervals identifies the density measure with the law in step 1.1.

F3F4F5F6F7F8step 1.1
3.1

The tail is P(X>t)=1 for 0t<1 and t3/2 for t1. F9 and F10 give EX=1+1t3/2dt and EX2=1+21t1/2dt. The primitives 2t1/2 and 2t evaluate compact integrals as 2(1R1/2) and 2(R1). The compact comparison and increasing-truncation argument in step 2.1 therefore give EX=3 and EX2=.

F9F10step 2.1
4.1

For any entire relation R, AC selects a successor function s and F11 iterates it from an arbitrary prescribed starting point; this proves F12. Together with the CC from step 1.1 it licenses F13. Apply F14 to these copies: step 3.1 verifies integrability with mean 3, although the second moment is infinite.

F11F12F13F14step 1.1step 3.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Nonidentical strong law under summable normalized variances

Example

Assume AC. Let (ϵn) be independent copies of P(ϵ=1)=P(ϵ=1)=1/2, and set Xn=n1/4ϵn. Then Sn/n0 almost surely although Var(Xn)=n is unbounded.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Variance and covariance identities for random variables: Let X,Y be square-integrable real random variables on one probability space. Then Var(X)=E[X2]E[X]2, Cov(X,Y)=E[XY]E[X]E[Y]. Moreover, covariance is symmetric and bilinear on finite linear combinations. On finite full-power-set probability spaces these formulas reduce to the published finite identities.

[F2]

The recursion theorem: Let (N,0,σ) be a Peano system (def-peano-system), in particular the natural numbers N (def-natural-numbers). For any set A, any element aA, and any function f:AA, there is a unique function g:NA such that g(0)=a and g(σ(n))=f(g(n)) for all nN.

[F3]

Countably many independent copies of a prescribed law exist: Assume countable choice and dependent choice. Every probability measure ν on (S,Σ) is the common law of a countable independent family of S-valued random elements.

[F4]

The exponent, product, quotient, and iterated-power laws for positive real bases and real exponents: For a,b>0 and r,sR, ar+s=aras,(ab)r=arbr,(a/b)r=ar/br,(ar)s=ars.

[F5]

The p-series for a real exponent p converges exactly when p is greater than one: For every real p, k11kp convergesp>1.

[F6]

Strong law under summable normalized variances: Let (Xn)n1 be independent square-integrable real random variables. Let 0<bn be deterministic and nondecreasing with bn. If n1Var(Xn)bn2<, then 1bnk=1n(XkEXk)0almost surely. In particular, for IID centered square-integrable variables and any ε>0, Sn/[n(logn)1/2+ε]0 almost surely (the displayed normalization is used for n2).

Verification

Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.

1.1

The two equally weighted atoms define a probability law, with Eϵ=(1+1)/2=0 and Eϵ2=(1+1)/2=1. F1 gives variance one.

F1
1.2

AC supplies a choice function on every countable nonempty family, hence CC. For a serial relation choose a successor function and iterate it by F2, giving DC. These are the hypotheses of F3, so the independent copies exist.

F2F3
2.1

Scaling each coordinate preserves independence, since the preimage of a Borel set depends only on that coordinate. F4 gives EXn=0, EXn2=n1/2 and Var(Xn)/n2=n3/2. By F5 the variance series is finite. Apply F6 with bn=n to obtain the stated limit. The variances tend to infinity because their squares equal n.

F4F5F6
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Weak law does not imply strong law

Statement refuted

A weak sample-mean law need not be a centered strong law. Assuming AC, there are integrable real (Xn) with Sn/n0 in probability but (SnESn)/n not tending to zero almost surely.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The recursion theorem: Let (N,0,σ) be a Peano system (def-peano-system), in particular the natural numbers N (def-natural-numbers). For any set A, any element aA, and any function f:AA, there is a unique function g:NA such that g(0)=a and g(σ(n))=f(g(n)) for all nN.

[F2]

A box in Rn with parameters aibi is Lebesgue measurable of measure i<n(biai), whichever of its faces are included: Let n1, assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (def-countable-choice), and let aibi be reals for i<n. Write

R:={xRn:ai<xi<bi for every i<n},R:=[a,b]={xRn:aixibi for every i<n}

(def-multidimensional-rectangle-and-volume). Then R is open and R is closed, so both are Borel and Lebesgue measurable, and every set R with RRR is Lebesgue measurable with

λn(R)  =  i<n(biai).

In particular this covers the four one-dimensional face conventions in each coordinate — the open box, the closed box [a,b], the half-open box B(a,b)=i<n(ai,bi] of def-half-open-box, and every mixture of them, in any combination of coordinates — and it gives measure 0 to all of them whenever ai=bi for some i<n. For a half-open box with infinite parameters the value is already λn(B)=vol(B) (thm-lebesgue-measure-is-a-complete-measure).

[F3]

Countably many independent copies of a prescribed law exist: Assume countable choice and dependent choice. Every probability measure ν on (S,Σ) is the common law of a countable independent family of S-valued random elements.

[F4]

Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence: Let (Xi)iI be an independent family of random elements Xi:(Ω,F,P)(Si,Σi). For each i, let gi:(Si,Σi)(Ti,Ti) be measurable. Then the family (giXi)iI is independent.

[F5]

Second Borel-Cantelli lemma under pairwise independence: Let (An)nN be pairwise independent events with n=0P(An)=+. Then P(An i.o.)=1.

Counterexample

Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.

1.1

AC restricted to a countable family gives CC; choosing a successor for each point of an entire relation and using F1 gives DC. On ((0,1),B,λ) the identity U has P(Ut)=t for 0<t<1 by F2. F3 supplies IID copies Un. Let Bn=1{Un1/(n+1)}, which are independent by F4.

F1F2F3F4
1.2

Set B0=0 and Xn=nBn(n1)Bn1. These finite-valued variables are integrable; telescoping gives Sn=nBn. Thus P(Sn/n>ε)1/(n+1)0 for every ε>0, and ESn/n=1/(n+1)0.

givenalgebra
2.1

The sum of 1/(n+1) diverges: each block 2jn+1<2j+1 contributes at least 1/2. The complementary probabilities n/(n+1) also have divergent sum. Apply F5 to the independent events Bn=1 and separately to Bn=0. Both occur infinitely often on a common conull event. Hence the centered averages Bn1/(n+1) have limsup 1 and liminf 0 there, refuting the centered strong law while step 1.2 establishes the weak law.

F5step 1.2
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Iid strong law fails at infinite absolute mean

Statement refuted

Assume AC. IID standard Cauchy variables have standard Cauchy sample means for every positive n. Their averages cannot converge in probability to a finite constant, and cannot converge almost surely to any finite random limit. Here the standard Cauchy law has CDF F(x)=1/2+arctan(x)/π.

Facts & Assumptions

ddxarctanx=11+x2,arctanx=0xdt1+t2.

For x<1,

arctanx=n=0(1)nx2n+12n+1.

At the endpoint, the ordinarily convergent alternating series satisfies

π4=113+1517+.

[F2]

Probability laws correspond to distribution functions: Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice.

  1. Let X be a real random variable, let PX be its law, and let FX(x)=P(Xx). Then FX is nondecreasing and right-continuous, satisfies limxFX(x)=0,limx+FX(x)=1, and obeys PX((a,b])=FX(b)FX(a)(a<b).
  2. Conversely, if F:RR is nondecreasing and right-continuous with limxF(x)=0,limx+F(x)=1, then there is a unique Borel probability measure μ on R such that μ((a,b])=F(b)F(a)(a<b), equivalently F(x)=μ((,x])(xR).
[F3]

The recursion theorem: Let (N,0,σ) be a Peano system (def-peano-system), in particular the natural numbers N (def-natural-numbers). For any set A, any element aA, and any function f:AA, there is a unique function g:NA such that g(0)=a and g(σ(n))=f(g(n)) for all nN.

[F4]

Countably many independent copies of a prescribed law exist: Assume countable choice and dependent choice. Every probability measure ν on (S,Σ) is the common law of a countable independent family of S-valued random elements.

[F5]

A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion: Let a<b be reals and let f:[a,b]R be continuous on [a,b] (def-continuity-real). Then f is bounded (def-bounded-set) and Riemann integrable on [a,b] (def-darboux-integral).

The proof gives more than integrability: it gives a partition that works. For every real ε>0 the uniform partition into N parts already satisfies U(f,P)L(f,P)<ε, as soon as N is large enough that (ba)/N is below the δ that uniform continuity supplies for ε/(2(ba)). Uniform continuity is exactly what makes one δ serve all N subintervals at once, and it is the only place where the compactness of [a,b] is used.

[F6]

The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G=f and f is integrable, then abf=G(b)G(a): Let a<b be reals, let G:[a,b]R be differentiable at every point of [a,b] as a function on [a,b] (def-derivative; at a and b this is the one-sided derivative), let f:=G, and suppose f is integrable on [a,b] (def-darboux-integral). Then

abf  =  G(b)G(a).

Both hypotheses are needed and neither is removable. A function may be differentiable everywhere with G not integrable — then the left-hand side does not exist (an everywhere differentiable function with unbounded derivative) — and an integrable f need not be the derivative of anything (the sign function); both witnesses are on the companion page.

No continuity of f is assumed, which is what makes this the working form: the theorem evaluates abf for every integrable derivative, not only for continuous integrands.

[F7]

A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral: Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let a<b and let f:[a,b]R be bounded and Riemann integrable. Then f is Lebesgue measurable on [a,b] and is integrable there, and its Lebesgue integral equals its Riemann integral: [a,b]fdλ1=abf(x)dx.

This is the point at which the completeness of Lebesgue measure is used essentially: the proof obtains a Borel function equal to f almost everywhere, and measurability of f itself is then a completeness statement.

[F8]

Monotone convergence for the integral: Let 0f1f2 be measurable and suppose fn(x)f(x) for every x. Then fndμfdμ.

[F9]

The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure: Let f:X[0,+] be measurable and define νf(A):=Afdμ(AA). Then νf is a measure on (X,A).

[F10]

Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system: Let P be a π-system on X generating A, and let μ,ν be measures on (X,A) that agree on P. Suppose there is an increasing sequence (Pn) in P with

X=nPn,μ(Pn)=ν(Pn)<+(nN).

Then μ=ν on A.

[F11]

The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t: For x>0, log is differentiable and log(x)=1x,logx=1xdtt.

[F12]

Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm: The function log:(0,)R is continuous and strictly increasing, is onto R, and satisfies, for x,y>0, log(xy)=logx+logy,log(x/y)=logxlogy,log(1/x)=logx. Also log1=0.

[F13]

Integrability is necessary for an iid finite mean strong law: If IID real (Xn) have Sn/n converging almost surely to a finite, possibly random, limit L, then EX1< and L=EX1 almost surely.

[F14]

Independent random elements have product joint law: Let n1, and let Xi:(Ω,F,P)(Si,Σi) for i<n be independent random elements. Define

X=(X0,,Xn1):Ωi<nSi.

Then X is a random element of (i<nSi,i<nΣi), and its law is the finite product of the marginal laws:

PX=i<nPXi.

[F15]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: Let (X,A,μ) and (Y,B,ν) be σ-finite measure spaces, and let f:X×Y[0,] be product-measurable. Then xYfxdν and yXfydμ are measurable, and

X×Yfd(μ×ν)=X(Yfxdν)dμ=Y(Xfydμ)dν.

[F16]

The principal inverse tangent arctan:R(π/2,π/2): By lem-tangent-principal-branch-is-bijective, tangent restricts to a continuous strictly increasing bijection

tan:(π/2,π/2)R.

Its inverse is the principal inverse tangent

arctan:R(π/2,π/2).

Thus tan(arctany)=y for every real y, while arctan(tanx)=x precisely for x in the displayed principal interval. The inverse is continuous and strictly increasing by thm-continuous-inverse.

[F17]

A box in Rn with parameters aibi is Lebesgue measurable of measure i<n(biai), whichever of its faces are included: Let n1, assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (def-countable-choice), and let aibi be reals for i<n. Write

R:={xRn:ai<xi<bi for every i<n},R:=[a,b]={xRn:aixibi for every i<n}

(def-multidimensional-rectangle-and-volume). Then R is open and R is closed, so both are Borel and Lebesgue measurable, and every set R with RRR is Lebesgue measurable with

λn(R)  =  i<n(biai).

In particular this covers the four one-dimensional face conventions in each coordinate — the open box, the closed box [a,b], the half-open box B(a,b)=i<n(ai,bi] of def-half-open-box, and every mixture of them, in any combination of coordinates — and it gives measure 0 to all of them whenever ai=bi for some i<n. For a half-open box with infinite parameters the value is already λn(B)=vol(B) (thm-lebesgue-measure-is-a-complete-measure).

Counterexample

Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.

1.1

The inverse in F16 is increasing onto (π/2,π/2). Its limit at positive infinity is the supremum of that range, π/2: for each u<π/2 in the range, x>tanu implies arctanx>u. The analogous argument at negative infinity gives π/2. Inverse-tangent calculus F1 gives derivative 1/(1+x2)>0. Thus F is increasing, continuous and has limits 0 and 1. AC gives CC by restriction to any countable family of nonempty sets, so F2 constructs the law. For a serial relation, AC selects a successor map; F3 iterates it, giving DC and licensing the IID construction in F4.

F1F2F3F4F16
1.2

For a>0 set fa(x)=a/[π(a2+x2)]. Its primitive is arctan(x/a)/π. Continuous integrability F5, F6, and the CC-qualified compact comparison F7 therefore evaluate its Lebesgue integral on every compact interval. F8 and the primitive limits give total mass one. F9 makes this a measure; equality of finite-interval increments and F10 identify its CDF as 1/2+arctan(x/a)/π. In particular f1 is the standard density.

F5F6F7F8F9F10
1.3

For fixed real x and a,b>0 put q=x2+b2a2 and H=q2+4a2x2=(x2+(a+b)2)(x2+(ab)2). If H>0, multiplication by the two denominators verifies the identity 1(y2+a2)((yx)2+b2)=Ay+By2+a2+A(yx)+D(yx)2+b2, where A=2x/H, B=q/H, D=(x2+a2b2)/H. The cubic coefficient cancels; the quadratic and linear coefficients are zero; the constant is one.

givenalgebra
2.1

For R>0, F11 gives 20Rxf1(x)dx=log(1+R2)/π. This tends to infinity by F12. The compact comparison and nonnegative MCT in step 1.2 show EX1=. Consequently F13 excludes any finite almost-sure limit of the sample means.

F11F12F13step 1.2
2.2

For independent variables with densities fa and fb, F14 and F15 give, on an interval (u,v], probability fa(y)uyvyfb(z)dzdy. For fixed y, the affine substitution z=x-y on the finite interval is justified by the continuous primitive in step 1.2, and changes the inner integral to uvfb(xy)dx. Tonelli then gives interval probability uv(fafb)(x)dx. This defines a mass-one density measure; interval uniqueness extends the equality to all Borel sets.

F14F15step 1.2
3.1

A singleton is a degenerate closed box of length zero by F17. Integrate step 1.3 on [-R,R] using the logarithm and inverse-tangent primitives in step 1.2 and step 2.1. The logarithmic contribution is (A/2)log(((Rx)2+b2)/((R+x)2+b2)), which tends to zero, while the arctangent contributions tend to π(B/a+D/b). Since bq+a(x2+a2b2)=(a+b)(x2+(ab)2), the limit is π(a+b)/(ab(x2+(a+b)2)). Multiplying by ab/π^2 gives (fafb)(x)=fa+b(x). The only excluded case is a=b and x=0. A singleton is Lebesgue-null, so this almost-everywhere equality suffices for the density measures; no subtraction of divergent integrals was made.

step 1.3step 1.2step 2.1F17
4.1

Induction with step 2.2 and step 3.1 gives density fn for Sn. Its CDF at nx is 1/2+arctan(nx/n)/π=F(x), so Sn/n has density f1 for every n. For any finite c, this law gives P(Sn/nc>1)=1(arctan(c+1)arctan(c1))/π>0, independently of n, since the arctangent difference is strictly less than π. Thus convergence in probability to c fails. Step 2.1 supplies the stronger obstruction to finite random almost-sure limits.

step 2.2step 3.1
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedaudited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Identical distribution without independence can defeat the mean law

Statement refuted

Identical integrable marginals alone do not imply the strong mean law: on {0,1} with equal masses, set X(ω)=ω and Xn=X for every n.

Counterexample

Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.

1.1

The law gives each atom mass 1/2 and has total mass one. Every coordinate has this same law, and EXn=0/2+1/2=1/2. It is integrable since |Xn|<=1.

givenalgebra
2.1

For every n, Sn/n=X at both points. Hence Sn/nEX1=1/2 everywhere, and convergence to the common mean fails on the whole space. Independence fails as well: P(X1=1,X2=1)=1/2(1/2)2.

givenalgebra

Sources