Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-09-09 (gpt-6-astra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strong law under summable normalized variances

Statement

Let (Xn)n≥1 be independent square-integrable real random variables. Let 0<bn be deterministic and nondecreasing with bn→∞. If ∑n≥1Var⁡(Xn)bn2<∞, then 1bn∑k=1n(Xk−EXk)⟶0almost surely. In particular, for IID centered square-integrable variables and any ε>0, Sn/[n(log⁡n)1/2+ε]→0 almost surely (the displayed normalization is used for n≥2).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Kolmogorov convergence criterion: For independent centered square-integrable real random variables (Xn)n≥1, if ∑n≥1Var⁡(Xn)<∞, then ∑n≥1Xn converges almost surely and in L2 to the same finite real random variable.

[F2]

Kronecker summation lemma: Let (xn)n≥1 be real and let 0<bn be deterministic, nondecreasing, and tend to infinity. If ∑n≥1xn/bn converges in R, then 1bn∑k=1nxk⟶0. Repeated values of bn are allowed.

[F3]

Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence: Let (Xi)i∈I be an independent family of random elements Xi:(Ω,F,P)→(Si,Σi). For each i, let gi:(Si,Σi)→(Ti,Ti) be measurable. Then the family (gi∘Xi)i∈I is independent.

[F4]

Variance and covariance identities for random variables: Let X,Y be square-integrable real random variables on one probability space. Then Var⁡(X)=E[X2]−E[X]2, Cov⁡(X,Y)=E[XY]−E[X]E[Y]. Moreover, covariance is symmetric and bilinear on finite linear combinations. On finite full-power-set probability spaces these formulas reduce to the published finite identities.

[F5]

The natural logarithm is strictly increasing, log⁡1=0, and log⁡(ab)=log⁡a+log⁡b for positive a,b (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm). Real powers of positive bases are ar=exp⁡(rlog⁡a) (Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention) and satisfy the product and iterated-power laws (The exponent, product, quotient, and iterated-power laws for positive real bases and real exponents). Since the exponential is strictly increasing (The exponential function is strictly increasing), a↦ar is strictly increasing for r>0.

[F6]

For real p>1, ∑j≥1j−p converges (The p-series for a real exponent p converges exactly when p is greater than one). A nonnegative series converges exactly when its partial sums are bounded (A series of nonnegative terms converges iff its partial sums are bounded, and then the sum is their supremum).

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses of the statement.

1.1F3F4F1given

The variables Yn=(Xn−EXn)/bn are independent, centered, and square-integrable, with variances Var⁡(Xn)/bn2. Measurable transformations give independence, and covariance bilinearity gives the variance identity. The convergence criterion makes ∑nYn converge on one probability-one event.

2.1F2step 1.1

On each path in that event apply Kronecker to xn=Xn−EXn and the given bn. The deterministic conclusion is precisely the asserted normalized convergence. Zero variances and repeated positive normalizers present no exception.

3.1F5givenstep 2.1algebra

To apply the general assertion of step 2.1 to the rate, put q=1/2+ε>0, p=2q=1+2ε>1, and bn=n1/2(log⁡n)q for n≥2, with b1=b2. By [F5], log⁡n≥log⁡2>0, both factors are positive and nondecreasing, and bn≥(log⁡2)qn→∞. Here the positive real power n1/2 is the positive square root because its square is n by the power laws; its unboundedness follows directly from n>A2 implying n>A for A>0. Also bn2=n(log⁡n)p. Thus the normalizers satisfy every hypothesis of the general assertion, once variance summability is checked.

4.1F5F6step 3.1algebra

For each integer j≥1, the block 2j≤n<2j+1 has exactly 2j terms. The logarithm product law gives log⁡(2j)=jlog⁡2 by finite induction. Consequently every term in that block is at most 1/[2j(jlog⁡2)p], and the whole block satisfies ∑n=2j2j+1−11/[n(log⁡n)p]≤(log⁡2)−pj−p. Every finite partial sum starting at n=2 is bounded by a sum of finitely many complete blocks: the elementary induction 2J≥J+1 ensures such an upper endpoint exists. By [F6] these block bounds have uniformly bounded partial sums, at most (log⁡2)−p∑j≥1j−p<∞. Applying the nonnegative bounded-partial-sum criterion, rather than assuming an infinite regrouping identity, proves ∑n≥21/[n(log⁡n)p]<∞.

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1given∎

The common variance is a finite σ2≥0. By steps 3.1–4.1, ∑nVar⁡(Xn)/bn2=σ2/b12+σ2∑n≥21/[n(log⁡n)p]<∞. The general assertion proved in steps 1.1–2.1 now gives the stated rate, including σ2=0. All normalizers, blocks and measurable transforms were explicitly defined; no Choice assumption or later strong-law/rate theorem is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources