Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Variance and covariance identities for random variables

Statement

Let X,Y be square-integrable real random variables on one probability space. Then Var⁡(X)=E[X2]−E[X]2, Cov⁡(X,Y)=E[XY]−E[X]E[Y]. Moreover, covariance is symmetric and bilinear on finite linear combinations. On finite full-power-set probability spaces these formulas reduce to the published finite identities.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Square-integrable real random variables X,Y.

[L1]

Variance and covariance are the expectations of the centered square and centered product (Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space).

[L2]

Expectation is linear on integrable random variables (Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation).

[L3]

Finite probability spaces agree with the full-power-set probability-space formalism (Finite probability spaces are exactly finite full-power-set probability spaces).

[L4]

In the finite model expectation is the weighted sum, and variance and covariance use the same centered-square and centered-product definitions (Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space, Variance, standard deviation, and covariance on a finite probability space).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Since the probability measure has total mass one, 2∣X∣≤1+X2 makes X integrable. Likewise 2∣XY∣≤X2+Y2 makes XY integrable. Finite linear combinations of square-integrable variables remain square-integrable by (a+b)2≤2a2+2b2, applied repeatedly. All expectations below are therefore finite.

2.1L1L2step 1.1algebra

Expanding (X−E[X])2 and applying [L2] gives Var⁡(X)=E[X2]−2E[X]E[X]+E[X]2=E[X2]−E[X]2. Likewise, Cov⁡(X,Y)=E[XY]−E[X]E[Y].

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L2algebra

The covariance formula in step 2.1 is symmetric in X and Y, so Cov⁡(X,Y)=Cov⁡(Y,X). If U=∑i<maiXi and V=∑j<nbjYj are finite linear combinations of square-integrable real random variables, step 1.1 makes them square-integrable. Expanding E[UV]−E[U]E[V] and using [L2] gives Cov⁡(U,V)=∑i<m∑j<naibjCov⁡(Xi,Yj).

4.1step 2.1step 3.1L3L4∎

On a finite full-power-set probability space, [L3] identifies the measure with its singleton weights. The integral of a finite-valued random variable is the sum of its values times those weights, so [L4] identifies the two expectations and the centered definitions. Thus the formulas in step 2.1 and step 3.1 agree with the finite identities.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources