How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Almost sure frequency of heads
Example
Assume AC and . On the countable product of the law , , the proportion of the first n coordinates that equal one converges almost surely to p.
Facts & Assumptions
Variance and covariance identities for random variables: Let be square-integrable real random variables on one probability space. Then Moreover, covariance is symmetric and bilinear on finite linear combinations. On finite full-power-set probability spaces these formulas reduce to the published finite identities.
The Axiom of Choice: The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement.
Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (def-choice-function).
Written out: for every set all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function with domain satisfying for all .
An equivalent formulation is that a product of nonempty sets is nonempty: if for every , then . Here is the set of functions with domain such that for every ; when a family of nonempty sets is indexed by itself, such an is precisely a choice function for it.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): The Axiom of Countable Choice, written , is the following statement.
For every family of nonempty sets indexed by there is a function with domain such that for every .
Equivalently, in the vocabulary of def-choice-function: every at most countable family of nonempty sets (def-countable) has a choice function.
The recursion theorem: Let be a Peano system (def-peano-system), in particular the natural numbers (def-natural-numbers). For any set , any element , and any function , there is a unique function such that and for all .
The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain: Let be a set and let be a binary relation on . Call entire on when
The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written , is the following statement.
For every nonempty set , every relation entire on , and every , there is a function (def-function, def-natural-numbers) with
Here a sequence in means a function from to , not necessarily a real-valued sequence. As everywhere in this library contains , and the sequence is indexed from ; the term is the prescribed starting point and every later term is related to its predecessor.
What DC adds to what came before. def-choice-function and def-axiom-of-choice select one element from each member of a family that is fixed in advance, and def-countable-choice does the same for a family indexed by . In both, the family is given before any selection is made. DC is the principle needed when the -th set to select from is not known until the first selections have been made: here the admissible values of are exactly the -successors of , so the family being chosen from is built along the choosing. That is precisely the situation does not cover, and it is why a construction "pick depending on , for every at once" is not licensed by countable choice.
The starting point may be dropped. The formally weaker statement obtained by deleting the clause — for every nonempty and every entire there is a sequence with for all — is an immediate consequence of the form above, since is nonempty and any of its elements may be taken as . The reverse derivation is standard and is not needed anywhere in this library, so it is not carried out; every use below prescribes .
need not be an order and the terms need not be distinct. What DC delivers is a sequence, that is a function , not a chain in the order-theoretic sense (def-chain). The relation may be symmetric, and the sequence may repeat a value or be constant; all that is asserted is at every index.
Assuming countable and dependent choice, countable products of arbitrary probability spaces: Assume countable choice and dependent choice. For probability spaces there is a unique probability measure on the canonical countable-product sigma-algebra having the prescribed finite product marginals.
Coordinate random elements of a countable product are independent: Under the measure of F6, the coordinate maps have laws and are independent.
Iid finite variance strong law: IID square-integrable real variables satisfy almost surely.
Verification
Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.
The two nonnegative masses sum to one; summing them over subsets of {0,1} gives a countably additive probability measure. Its identity variable has , , and hence by F1.
Under F2, applying a choice function to a countable nonempty family gives F3. For each entire relation R choose a successor s(a) for every a; F4 produces the iterates of s from a prescribed initial point, proving F5. Thus F6 constructs the canonical countable product and F7 makes its coordinate maps independent with the law in step 1.1. For , put ; then is IID with that law.
F8 applies to using the finite variance in step 1.1 and independence in step 2.1. Since counts the ones among , it yields the displayed frequency limit. If or , each coordinate equals that value almost surely, and a countable union of zero-probability exceptions is null.
Depends on
- Assuming countable and dependent choice, countable products of arbitrary probability spaces
- Coordinate random elements of a countable product are independent
- Iid finite variance strong law
- The Axiom of Choice
- Probability measures and probability spaces
- Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable
- Variance and covariance identities for random variables
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- The recursion theorem
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, §§2.4–2.5, pp. 76–87 (standard reference, not scraped)