How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One-step and multistep forecasts for a causal AR(1)
Example
Let , , and let be centered, square-integrable white noise: and for . Suppose a weakly stationary process has the causal representation and hence satisfies . For every , its forecast is and its error variance is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The weakly stationary causal AR(1) representation and the centered, finite-variance, pairwise uncorrelated innovations specified above.
Weak stationarity gives square-integrability of every coordinate and a common mean. Strict and weak stationarity for integer-indexed time series
The finite-history best linear forecast is the unique class minimizing squared error over the affine span of the observed history. Best linear forecast from a finite history
Variance and covariance are centered second moments and covariance is bilinear on finite sums. Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space Variance and covariance identities for random variables
Cauchy–Schwarz bounds the absolute expectation of a product of two square-integrable variables by the product of their norms. Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables
Verification
Reindexing the convergent causal series gives ; repeating this identity gives , where . Every innovation in has index greater than , while the causal series for each , , uses only indices at most .
For each , every finite partial sum for uses innovation indices at most , so its covariance with each future term of is zero by the uncorrelated-noise assumption; [F4] passes this covariance identity to the limit. Thus and , making the residual orthogonal to the constant and every history variable.
Let and let any competing affine forecast be in the history span; then is also in that span. Step 2.1 gives and for every ; bilinearity [F3] gives , hence . Since , expansion yields , with equality exactly when as an class. Thus is the unique best class by [F2]. The innovations in are pairwise uncorrelated, so [F3] gives . This proves both formulas without Gaussian or independent innovations.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Dewei Wang, STAT 720 Time Series Analysis, Sections 5.2 and 5.5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Nicolai Meinshausen, Time Series Analysis: Notes for the course HS 2022, Section 2.7 (standard reference, not scraped)