Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pairwise-independent Borel-Cantelli frequency law

Statement

Let (An)n1 be pairwise independent events with n=1P(An)=+. For n1, put Sn:=k=1n1Ak,an:=k=1nP(Ak). Then an>0 for all sufficiently large n, and for those n Then Snan1almost surely.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Pairwise independent events (An)n1 with n=1P(An)=+, and the sums Sn,an of the Statement.

[L1]

Pairwise independence means P(AiAj)=P(Ai)P(Aj)(ij). (Pairwise independence)

[L2]

An indicator of a measurable event is a real random variable, and its expectation is the probability of the event. (An indicator function is measurable exactly when its set is measurable, The expectation of an indicator is the probability of the event)

[L3]

Finite sums, products, and absolute values of measurable real-valued functions are measurable. (Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined)

[L4]

Expectation is linear on integrable random variables, and Var(X)=E[X2]E[X]2 for square-integrable real random variables. (Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation, Variance and covariance identities for random variables)

[L5]

Chebyshev's inequality bounds the probability of a centered deviation by variance divided by the square threshold. (Chebyshev's inequality for random variables)

[L6]

If a sum of event probabilities is finite, then the corresponding limsup event has probability zero. (First Borel-Cantelli lemma for events)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For each k, the indicator 1Ak is a real random variable by [L2]. Repeated use of [L4] and [L2] gives E[Sn]=k=1nE[1Ak]=k=1nP(Ak)=an. The divergence hypothesis makes an+. In particular, there is N1 with an>0 for every nN.

givenL2L4
2.1

For ij, step 1.1 and [L1] give E[1Ai1Aj]=E[1AiAj]=P(AiAj)=P(Ai)P(Aj)=E[1Ai]E[1Aj]. Also 1Ak2=1Ak for every k.

step 1.1L1L2algebra
3.1

By [L3], the partial sum Sn and its square Sn2 are measurable. Expanding Sn2 and using step 2.1 together with linearity from [L4] yields E[Sn2]=k=1nP(Ak)+21i<jnP(Ai)P(Aj)=an2+k=1n(P(Ak)P(Ak)2)an2+an. So Sn is square-integrable, and [L4] gives Var(Sn)=E[Sn2]E[Sn]2an.

step 1.1step 2.1L3L4algebra
4.1

Fix ε>0 and nN. Applying [L5] to Sn gives P(Snan1ε)=P(Snanεan)Var(Sn)ε2an21ε2an. Hence Sn/an1 in probability along the defined tail nN.

step 1.1step 3.1L5algebra
5.1

For each integer m1, let nm be the least index with anma1+m2; it exists by step 1.1. Since anm1<a1+m2anm and anmanm1=P(Anm)1, one has a1+m2anm<a1+m2+1. Therefore step 4.1 yields P(Snmanm1ε)1ε2(a1+m2), and the sum over m is finite.

step 1.1step 4.1algebra
6.1

For each integer r1, step 5.1 with ε=1/r gives m=1P(Snmanm11r)<+. Applying [L6] to these deviation events shows that, for each r, only finitely many of them occur almost surely.

step 5.1L6
7.1

Intersect the full-probability events from step 6.1 over all rN>0. On that still full-probability event, for every r there is Mr(ω) such that Snm(ω)anm1<1r(mMr(ω)). Hence Snm/anm1 almost surely.

step 6.1algebra
8.1

Fix ω in the full-probability event from step 7.1. If nmn<nm+1, then Snm(ω)Sn(ω)Snm+1(ω) and anman<anm+1, so Snm(ω)anm+1Sn(ω)anSnm+1(ω)anm. Since anm/anm+11 and anm+1/anm1 by the bounds in step 5.1, step 7.1 squeezes Sn(ω)/an to 1. Therefore Sn/an1 almost surely for all sufficiently large n, equivalently for all n with an>0.

step 5.1step 7.1algebra
9.1

Step 8.1 is exactly the asserted frequency law.

step 8.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources