How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Pairwise-independent Borel-Cantelli frequency law
Statement
Let be pairwise independent events with For , put Then for all sufficiently large , and for those Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Pairwise independent events with , and the sums of the Statement.
Pairwise independence means (Pairwise independence)
An indicator of a measurable event is a real random variable, and its expectation is the probability of the event. (An indicator function is measurable exactly when its set is measurable, The expectation of an indicator is the probability of the event)
Finite sums, products, and absolute values of measurable real-valued functions are measurable. (Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined)
Expectation is linear on integrable random variables, and for square-integrable real random variables. (Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation, Variance and covariance identities for random variables)
Chebyshev's inequality bounds the probability of a centered deviation by variance divided by the square threshold. (Chebyshev's inequality for random variables)
If a sum of event probabilities is finite, then the corresponding limsup event has probability zero. (First Borel-Cantelli lemma for events)
Proof
For each , the indicator is a real random variable by [L2]. Repeated use of [L4] and [L2] gives The divergence hypothesis makes . In particular, there is with for every .
For , step 1.1 and [L1] give Also for every .
By [L3], the partial sum and its square are measurable. Expanding and using step 2.1 together with linearity from [L4] yields So is square-integrable, and [L4] gives
Fix and . Applying [L5] to gives Hence in probability along the defined tail .
For each integer , let be the least index with ; it exists by step 1.1. Since and , one has Therefore step 4.1 yields and the sum over is finite.
For each integer , step 5.1 with gives Applying [L6] to these deviation events shows that, for each , only finitely many of them occur almost surely.
Intersect the full-probability events from step 6.1 over all . On that still full-probability event, for every there is such that Hence almost surely.
Fix in the full-probability event from step 7.1. If , then and , so Since and by the bounds in step 5.1, step 7.1 squeezes to . Therefore almost surely for all sufficiently large , equivalently for all with .
Step 8.1 is exactly the asserted frequency law.
Depends on
- Pairwise independence
- An indicator function is measurable exactly when its set is measurable
- The expectation of an indicator is the probability of the event
- Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined
- Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation
- Variance and covariance identities for random variables
- Chebyshev's inequality for random variables
- First Borel-Cantelli lemma for events
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Rick Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, 5th ed., Theorem 2.3.9 (standard reference, not scraped)