How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nonidentical strong law under summable normalized variances
Example
Assume AC. Let be independent copies of , and set . Then almost surely although is unbounded.
Facts & Assumptions
Variance and covariance identities for random variables: Let be square-integrable real random variables on one probability space. Then Moreover, covariance is symmetric and bilinear on finite linear combinations. On finite full-power-set probability spaces these formulas reduce to the published finite identities.
The recursion theorem: Let be a Peano system (def-peano-system), in particular the natural numbers (def-natural-numbers). For any set , any element , and any function , there is a unique function such that and for all .
Countably many independent copies of a prescribed law exist: Assume countable choice and dependent choice. Every probability measure on is the common law of a countable independent family of -valued random elements.
Strong law under summable normalized variances: Let be independent square-integrable real random variables. Let be deterministic and nondecreasing with . If then In particular, for IID centered square-integrable variables and any , almost surely (the displayed normalization is used for ).
Verification
Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.
The two equally weighted atoms define a probability law, with and . F1 gives variance one.
AC supplies a choice function on every countable nonempty family, hence CC. For a serial relation choose a successor function and iterate it by F2, giving DC. These are the hypotheses of F3, so the independent copies exist.
Scaling each coordinate preserves independence, since the preimage of a Borel set depends only on that coordinate. F4 gives , and . By F5 the variance series is finite. Apply F6 with =n to obtain the stated limit. The variances tend to infinity because their squares equal n.
Depends on
- Countably many independent copies of a prescribed law exist
- Strong law under summable normalized variances
- Probability measures and probability spaces
- Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable
- Variance and covariance identities for random variables
- Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention
- The exponent, product, quotient, and iterated-power laws for positive real bases and real exponents
- The p-series for a real exponent p converges exactly when p is greater than one
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- The recursion theorem
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, §§2.4–2.5, pp. 76–87 (standard reference, not scraped)