Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonidentical strong law under summable normalized variances

Example

Assume AC. Let (ϵn) be independent copies of P(ϵ=1)=P(ϵ=−1)=1/2, and set Xn=n1/4ϵn. Then Sn/n→0 almost surely although Var⁡(Xn)=n is unbounded.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Variance and covariance identities for random variables: Let X,Y be square-integrable real random variables on one probability space. Then Var⁡(X)=E[X2]−E[X]2, Cov⁡(X,Y)=E[XY]−E[X]E[Y]. Moreover, covariance is symmetric and bilinear on finite linear combinations. On finite full-power-set probability spaces these formulas reduce to the published finite identities.

[F2]

The recursion theorem: Let (N,0,σ) be a Peano system (def-peano-system), in particular the natural numbers N (def-natural-numbers). For any set A, any element a∈A, and any function f:A→A, there is a unique function g:N→A such that g(0)=a and g(σ(n))=f(g(n)) for all n∈N.

[F3]

Countably many independent copies of a prescribed law exist: Assume countable choice and dependent choice. Every probability measure ν on (S,Σ) is the common law of a countable independent family of S-valued random elements.

[F4]

The exponent, product, quotient, and iterated-power laws for positive real bases and real exponents: For a,b>0 and r,s∈R, ar+s=aras,(ab)r=arbr,(a/b)r=ar/br,(ar)s=ars.

[F5]

The p-series for a real exponent p converges exactly when p is greater than one: For every real p, ∑k≥11kp converges⟺p>1.

[F6]

Strong law under summable normalized variances: Let (Xn)n≥1 be independent square-integrable real random variables. Let 0<bn be deterministic and nondecreasing with bn→∞. If ∑n≥1Var⁡(Xn)bn2<∞, then 1bn∑k=1n(Xk−EXk)⟶0almost surely. In particular, for IID centered square-integrable variables and any ε>0, Sn/[n(log⁡n)1/2+ε]→0 almost surely (the displayed normalization is used for n≥2).

Verification

Given: The objects, hypotheses and definitions in the statement. Its conclusions are to be established below.

1.1F1

The two equally weighted atoms define a probability law, with Eϵ=(−1+1)/2=0 and Eϵ2=(1+1)/2=1. F1 gives variance one.

1.2F2F3

AC supplies a choice function on every countable nonempty family, hence CC. For a serial relation choose a successor function and iterate it by F2, giving DC. These are the hypotheses of F3, so the independent copies exist.

2.1F4F5F6∎

Scaling each coordinate preserves independence, since the preimage of a Borel set depends only on that coordinate. F4 gives EXn=0, EXn2=n1/2 and Var⁡(Xn)/n2=n−3/2. By F5 the variance series is finite. Apply F6 with bn=n to obtain the stated limit. The variances tend to infinity because their squares equal n.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources