Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Standard-Borel Real Codings and Determining Classes

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

An explicit real coding starts with canonical binary rows, interleaves their digits, and embeds the sequence in separated ternary cylinders. The Borel description of the allowed rows proves image measurability as well as measurability of the inverse.

Under the stated Axiom of Choice convention, a Polish presentation and the completely-metrizable-subspace theorem extend this coding to every standard-Borel space. Rational cuts then produce a countable point-separating algebra that determines finite measures. A topology-refinement lemma also proves that Borel subsets of Polish spaces have Polish presentations with the same measurable sets. Empty spaces are included; no infinite-measure determination or cardinality classification is asserted.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Hilbert cube has a bimeasurable real coding

Statement

There is an explicit Borel measurable bijection c:[0,1]NC onto a Borel subset C[0,1], whose inverse is Borel measurable. The cube carries its product topology and its Borel sigma-algebra; indices start at zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The cube Q=[0,1]N with its product topology and Borel sigma-algebra; natural indices start at zero.

[F1]

The integer part is the unique integer m with mt<m+1. (Integer part: for every real x there is exactly one integer m with mx<m+1)

[F2]

Geometric series with ratios 1/2 and 1/3 converge, with their stated sums. (For r<1, k0rk=1/(1r), and for r1 the series diverges)

[F3]

The explicit map J(i,l)=2i(2l+1) bijects pairs of naturals with positive integers. (N×NN)

[F5]

Rational intervals generate the real Borel sigma-algebra. (Seven generating families for the Borel sigma-algebra on the real line)

[F6]

The rationals have an explicit countable enumeration. (Q is countably infinite)

[F7]

Between distinct reals lies a rational. (The rationals embed densely in the reals)

[F9]

Borel sets are the sigma-algebra generated by open sets. (The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space)

[F10]

Positive-base integer powers and their reciprocals are defined. (Integer powers am)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For 0t1/2 put mk=2kt for k0 and bk=mk2mk1 for k1. Since mk12k1t<mk1+1, we have bk{0,1}. Each mk is Borel: {mk=l}=[l2k,(l+1)2k)[0,1/2]. Thus each digit is Borel.

F1F5F10
2.1

Here m0=0. Telescoping gives k=1nbk2k=2nmn and 0t2nmn<2n, so t=k1bk2k. The digits cannot be eventually all ones: such a tail would make t dyadic, whereas for dyadic t the integers 2kt are exact for all sufficiently large k, giving bk=0. Thus there are infinitely many zeros, including when t=0 or t=1/2.

step 1.1F2
2.2

Interleave cube digits by aJ(i,k1)=bk(xi/2). The bijection in [F3] assigns exactly one digit to each positive position. For any binary sequence a, define T(a)=j12aj3j. Its values lie in [0,1]. Agreement through position n gives T(a)T(a)3n. If the first differing position is n, its contribution has magnitude 23n and the remaining tail has magnitude at most 3n, so T(a)T(a)3n>0. Thus T is continuous and injective.

F2F3step 1.1
3.1

Conversely let (bk) be a binary sequence with infinitely many zeros and sum t1/2. Its tail after n, multiplied by 2n, lies in [0,1): the all-one tail sums to one, and at least one digit is zero. Hence 2nt=k=1nbk2nk, recovering exactly the digits of step 1.1. In binary sequence space D={0,1}N1, the allowable row set is R=N1kN{b:bk=0}{b:k1bk2k1/2}. It is Borel: cylinders are clopen and the sum is continuous because the tail is at most 2n.

step 1.1step 2.1F2F9
3.2

For a binary word w of length n, let sw=j=1n2wj3j and Iw=[sw,sw+3n]. Distinct words of the same length give disjoint intervals separated by a positive gap. The closed set K=n1w=nIw equals T[D]: each point of the intersection has a unique word at each length; nesting forces consistent prefixes; the resulting sequence has sum equal to the point since interval lengths tend to zero. Conversely each sum lies in every prefix interval. The inverse digits are continuous on K because the finitely many cylinders at each length are separated. Hence T:DK is a homeomorphism, without an appeal to product compactness.

step 2.2F2
4.1

The deinterleaving row maps DD, a(aJ(i,k1))k1, are continuous: a finite row-cylinder condition is a finite cylinder condition on a. Therefore H={a:every deinterleaved row belongs to R} is Borel in D. The homeomorphism gives C=T[H]=(T1)1[H] Borel in K. Since K is closed in [0,1], a trace Borel set in K is Borel in [0,1]: the trace sets form a sigma-algebra, and relative opens are traces of ambient opens.

step 3.1step 3.2F9
5.1

The map c(x)=T(a(x)) is measurable: every interleaved digit is Borel by step 1.1 and every finite sum has finite range with Borel level sets (finite unions of intersections of digit level sets), so [F4] applies. Its inverse on C is xi=2k1(T1z)J(i,k1)2k. These coordinates are measurable by [F4]. They lie in [0,1] and recover both compositions by the row characterization; thus c is a bijection onto precisely C.

step 1.1step 3.1step 2.2step 4.1F4
6.1

For completeness, rational intervals restricted to [0,1] form a countable basis by density. Finite coordinate boxes from these intervals are countable explicitly. Enumerate rational endpoints by [F6]. A coordinate condition xi(pj,pk)[0,1] has code J(i,J(j,k)). A list of condition codes (z0,,zl1) has code J(l,el), where e0=0 and er+1=J(er,zr). Inverting the injective J recovers the length and every entry, so this encodes lists injectively. Each box is represented by such a finite list; assigning the least code of its representations injects the family of boxes into the naturals. The empty list represents the whole cube. Every open subset of the cube is a union of a subfamily of this countable basis. Thus the Borel sigma-algebra equals the coordinate-generated sigma-algebra, and coordinate measurability in step 5.1 proves measurability of the whole inverse. This establishes all assertions.

F3F5F6F7F8F9step 5.1

Source notes

Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, 5th ed., Theorem 2.1.22, printed pp.53–54 (PDF pp.61–62). The complete coding paragraph and its caveat were read. The present proof replaces the abbreviated digit argument by a Borel row condition and separated ternary cylinders. The interleaving uses the actual bijection in the local supplier rather than attributing a diagonal formula to that supplier.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Standard borel spaces admit bimeasurable real codings

Statement

Assume AC. Every standard-Borel space (E,S) is measurably isomorphic to a Borel subset of [0,1], including E=.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and a standard-Borel space (E,S).

[F1]

There is a Polish presentation h:EP preserving Borel sets in both directions. (Standard Borel spaces)

[F2]

A separable metrizable space embeds homeomorphically in the Hilbert cube. (Every separable metrizable space embeds in the Hilbert cube [0,1]N)

[F3]

The weighted sum of complete coordinate metrics bounded by one metrizes the cube. (The standard weighted metric on a countable product of bounded complete metric spaces is complete)

[F4]

Under DC, a completely metrizable subspace of a metric space is Gδ. (Under Dependent Choice, every completely metrizable subspace of a metric space is Gδ)

[F5]

The cube has a bimeasurable coding c onto a Borel C[0,1]. (Hilbert cube has a bimeasurable real coding)

[F6]

AC supplies the choices in the metric interfaces, including DC by selecting a successor for each admissible finite history and recursively iterating. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F7]

Every real Cauchy sequence converges. (The reals are complete)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If E=, the empty bijection onto is bimeasurable. Otherwise fix the single Polish presentation h:EP of [F1]. Its separability and metrizability give a homeomorphic embedding e:PQ=[0,1]N by [F2].

F1F2
2.1

The interval [0,1] is complete: a Cauchy sequence converges in R by [F7], and its limit stays between zero and one by the limit inequalities. Its metric is bounded by one. The metric D(x,y)=n02(n+1)xnyn makes Q a metric space by [F3]. The image Y=e[P] is completely metrizable, transporting a complete compatible metric from P. AC supplies DC as described in [F6], so [F4] yields that Y is Gδ and consequently Borel in Q. The currently repaired supplier proves the ambient equality: points in every small open neighbourhood union lie within 1/n of Y, hence in its closure, before the complete-metric limit argument.

step 1.1F3F4F6F7
3.1

Let c:QC be [F5]. Since c1 is measurable, c[Y]=(c1)1[Y] is Borel in C, and therefore in [0,1], because C itself is Borel. Restricting c and its inverse to Y and c[Y] preserves measurability. The homeomorphism e is bimeasurable on trace Borel sets. Thus ceh and h1e1c1 are mutually inverse measurable maps between E and c[Y].

step 1.1step 2.1F5

Source notes

Durrett Theorem 2.1.22, printed pp.53–54, provides the coding route. Its omitted image detail is supplied by the local cube lemma and the current forward completely-metrizable-to-G-delta theorem; no converse or external recorded theorem is imported.

CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Standard borel spaces have countable generating and measure determining algebras

Statement

Assume AC. Every standard-Borel space (E,S) has a countable algebra A which generates S, separates points, and determines finite measures: if finite measures μ,ν agree on A, then μ=ν. In particular it determines probability measures.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and a standard-Borel space (E,S); in the determination assertion, two finite measures agreeing on the constructed algebra.

[F1]

There is a bimeasurable bijection f:EB with B[0,1] Borel. (Standard borel spaces admit bimeasurable real codings)

[F2]

The rational cuts can be enumerated. (Q is countably infinite)

[F3]

Rational right rays generate real Borel sets; their complementary closed left rays do also. (Seven generating families for the Borel sigma-algebra on the real line)

[F4]

Under countable choice a countable union of finite sets is countable. (Countable unions of at most countable sets, assuming ACω)

[F5]

Countable choice selects from each nonempty set in a sequence. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F6]

AC supplies that countable choice by restriction of a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F7]

A lambda-system containing a pi-system contains its generated sigma-algebra. (Dynkin's pi-lambda theorem)

[F8]

Rational cuts separate two distinct real numbers. (The rationals embed densely in the reals)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix f from [F1]. Enumerate the pullbacks Hq=f1[B(,q]] using [F2]. Let An be the Boolean algebra on the first n pullbacks, with A0={,E}. Its atoms are the at most 2n intersections obtained by taking each generator or its complement; every member is a union of atoms. Thus each An is finite, and A=nAn is an algebra: any two elements lie in a common An.

F1F2
2.1

AC implies [F5], so [F4] makes A countable. This is the exact countable-choice use for enumerating the finite algebras. The trace of the generators of [F3] generates B(B), so bimeasurability of f gives σ(A)=S. If xy, injectivity gives different codes; [F8] provides a rational between them, and its pullback contains exactly the lower-coded point.

step 1.1F1F3F4F5F6F8
3.1

For finite μ,ν agreeing on A, their total masses agree because EA. The equality class D={AS:μ(A)=ν(A)} contains E, is closed under complements by subtracting from the common finite total, and under countable disjoint unions by countable additivity. It is a lambda-system containing the pi-system A. By [F7], SD. This also covers zero total mass and E=; finiteness prevents subtraction of infinite totals.

step 1.1step 2.1F7

Source notes

Durrett Theorem 2.1.22 (printed pp.53–54) motivates real coding. The finite-algebra construction and finite-total lambda-system argument are derived here from the exact local countability and pi-lambda statements; arbitrary infinite measures are outside the claim.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Borel subspaces admit polish presentations

Statement

Assume AC. If B is a Borel subset of a Polish space (P,τ), then B has a finer Polish topology with exactly the trace sigma-algebra B(P)B. In fact there is a finer Polish topology on P with the same Borel sets which makes B clopen. Thus (B,B(P)B) is standard Borel.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a Polish space (P,τ), and a Borel subset BP.

[F1]

Polish means separable and completely metrizable. (Polish spaces are separable completely metrizable spaces)

[F2]

Under countable choice, a Gδ subspace of a complete metric space has a compatible complete metric. (Under the Axiom of Countable Choice, every Gδ subspace of a complete metric space is completely metrizable)

[F3]

Countably many complete metrics bounded by one have a complete product metric. (The standard weighted metric on a countable product of bounded complete metric spaces is complete)

[F4]

Under countable choice, complete metrizability plus a countable basis is equivalent to being Polish. (For completely metrizable spaces, the separable and second-countable definitions of Polish space agree under countable choice)

[F5]

AC selects the countable family of topology, metric and basis witnesses and supplies countable choice. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F6]

A Polish presentation with exactly the given Borel sigma-algebra makes a space standard Borel. (Standard Borel spaces)

[F7]

Under countable choice, a countable union of countable sets is countable. (Countable unions of at most countable sets, assuming ACω)

[F8]

A finite product of countable sets is countable, by iteration of the binary product statement. (A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If P is empty there is only the empty subset and the assertion holds. On nonempty P, fix a compatible complete metric and a countable basis using [F1], [F4] and [F5]. An open U is Gδ (repeat U), so [F2] completely metrizes it; its closed complement is complete in the restricted original metric since a limit of a sequence in a closed set stays there. Both subspaces have countable trace bases and hence are Polish by [F4].

F1F2F4F5
2.1

Bound each component metric by replacing d with min(d,1); this preserves its topology and Cauchy sequences, hence completeness. On the disjoint union of U and PU, retain those metrics within components and set cross-component distance equal to two. The triangle inequality holds within a component and across components (any cross-component path includes an edge of length two). A Cauchy sequence is eventually in one component and converges there. A union of the two countable bases is countable. This Polish topology is finer than τ, makes U clopen, and has the same Borel sets: each new open is the union of two old trace-open sets, hence old Borel. Empty components simply contribute no points.

step 1.1
3.1

Let R be the old Borel subsets that can be made clopen by such a refinement. Step 2.1 puts every open set in R; closure under complements uses the same topology. Given BnR, [F5] selects a witnessing Polish topology τn+1, complete bounded metric and countable basis for each n. Include τ0=τ. In n0(P,τn) let Δ={(x,x,):xP}.

step 2.1F5
4.1

The diagonal Δ is closed. If two coordinates differ, disjoint neighbourhoods in the original metric topology pull back to open neighbourhoods in both refined coordinates; their product cylinder misses Δ. The product is completely metrized by [F3], so its closed subspace Δ is complete. It has a countable basis of finite cylinders restricted to Δ; For each finite length the coordinate-index and basis-index lists form a countable set by [F8]; [F7] makes the union over lengths countable, with its countable-choice hypothesis supplied by [F5]. By [F4] it is Polish. Pull its topology back to P along x(x,x,). This refines every τn. Each basic open is a finite intersection of old Borel sets, and every open is a union of a subfamily of the countable basis. Thus every new open is old Borel; the two Borel sigma-algebras coincide.

step 3.1F3F4F5F7F8
5.1

Each Bn is clopen in the common refinement, so nBn is open. Apply the splitting construction of step 2.1 to that Polish topology, making the union clopen while preserving its Borel sets, hence the original Borel sets. Consequently R is a sigma-algebra containing τ, and contains every old Borel set. For the specified B, restrict the resulting complete metric and countable basis to the closed set B. This is a Polish topology on B, finer than its original subspace topology; its Borel sets are precisely the old traces, since relative opens generate traces of Borel sets in either topology. The identity is the Polish presentation required by [F6].

step 2.1step 4.1F4F6

Source notes

Marker, Descriptive Set Theory, Lemmas 2.22–2.23 and Theorem 2.24, printed pp.20–21 (PDF indices 19–20), full statements and proofs read. The closed-diagonal argument is expanded using continuity to the original Hausdorff topology. Rao–Srivastava, An Elementary Proof of the Borel Isomorphism Theorem, pp.347–349, is retained as the scaffold’s independent background treatment, not a load-bearing citation in this proof.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources