How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every separable metrizable space embeds in the Hilbert cube
Statement
Every separable metrizable space is homeomorphic to a subspace of the Hilbert cube .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects, hypotheses, and choice principles stated above.
A topological space is separable if some at most countable subset is dense in (def-dense-top, def-countable). Equivalently, every nonempty open subset of meets . (Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset).
A topological space (def-topological-space) is metrizable if there is a metric on (def-metric-space) whose metric topology is , that is (def-metric-topology). Such a is said to induce or metrise . (Metrizable space: a topological space whose topology is induced by some metric; metrizability is topological, the metric is not).
The product set. Let be a set and let be a set for each . The product is and we write , the -th coordinate of . Two elements of the product are equal exactly when they agree at every index, functions being equal when they have the same domain and the same values. For the -th projection is . The product topology on is the initial topology of the projections: the topology generated by the subbasis . Finite intersections of subbasic sets form a basis for it, and they are exactly the boxes with every open in and for all but finitely many . (The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space).
Let be a metric space (def-metric-space) and define, for , Both are well defined: (lem-metric-nonnegativity), so and is invertible, and the minimum of a two-element set of reals exists (lem-finite-set-has-max, def-max-min). Then: 1. and are metrics on . 2. and for all ; hence and are bounded metric spaces (def-metric-bounded-diameter), and if then for both. 3. and are each uniformly equivalent to , hence topologically equivalent to it (def-equivalent-metrics, thm-metric-equivalence-hierarchy). Consequently every metric space carries a bounded metric with exactly the same topology, so boundedness cannot be read off the topology alone. ( and are metrics uniformly equivalent to , so every metric space carries a bounded metric with the same topology).
Proof
The empty space embeds by its unique map into the Hilbert cube.
For a nonempty space choose a countable dense sequence and a bounded compatible metric.
Map a point to its bounded distances from the dense sequence.
The coordinates are continuous and separate points; if coordinate values converge, a coordinate centred close to the proposed point forces metric convergence.
Rescale the coordinate range to the unit interval and identify the induced topology with the product topology.
The preceding construction and implications establish the assertion.
Depends on
- Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset
- Metrizable space: a topological space whose topology is induced by some metric; metrizability is topological, the metric is not
- The product set $\prod_{i \in I} X_i$ of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space
- $\min(d,1)$ and $d/(1+d)$ are metrics uniformly equivalent to $d$, so every metric space carries a bounded metric with the same topology
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 91 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- David Marker, Descriptive Set Theory, §§1–2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michael Kunzinger, General Topology, §§11.3–11.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- MFF General Topology course summary, §4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jesse Peterson, Real Analysis, §§3.6–3.7 (standard reference, not scraped)