Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A zero Wada denominator makes that deleted column inadmissible

Statement refuted

Assume the Axiom of Choice. The assertion that every generator-column deletion gives a defined Wada quotient for a based deficiency-one spine is false. Let X be the standard unknot exterior, with its circle spine generated by a positive meridian y, and form a based simple expansion by adding a 1-cell x and a 2-cell attached by the word r=x. This gives the based deficiency-one presentation ⟨x,y∣x⟩. Use the trivial one-dimensional representation over Q and the full abelianization deck map ψ(x)=1, ψ(y)=t into H=⟨t⟩≅Z. For the x column, the Fox minor is 0 and the denominator is 0, so that column's Wada quotient is undefined; for the y column, the denominator is t−1≠0 and the quotient is 1/(t−1). Thus the invalidity of one designated column does not imply that another column is inadmissible.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; the standard solid-torus model of the unknot exterior; the based circle spine; the elementary expansion adding the pair (x,r=x); the trivial representation; and the specified full abelianization map.

[A1]

AC is inherited from the twisted-chain convention. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

The Wada quotient for a selected generator column is defined only when its denominator det⁡(ρ(xj)ψ(xj)−I) is nonzero; its numerator is the determinant of the Fox matrix with that block column deleted. The admissible Wada quotient of a deficiency-one exterior spine

[F2]

The based twisted differential for a generator z is multiplication by ρ(z)ψ(z)−1, and acyclic based torsion is computed by the alternating determinant product. Twisted chain complex and based Reidemeister torsion for link exteriors

[F3]

The compact exterior of a chosen closed normal-disk tube N(K) is EK=S3∖int⁡N(K), with its boundary retained. Knot exterior

[F4]

The positive meridian generates the first homology of a knot exterior. Homology and preferred longitude of a knot exterior; Meridian and preferred longitude

Counterexample

1.1A1F3F4givenconstruct

Under [A1], realize S3 as {(z,w)∈C2:∣z∣2+∣w∣2=1} and its standard unknot as K={w=0}. Choose 0<a<1/2 and the normal-disk tube N(K)={∣w∣≤a}, parametrized by (v,w)↦(1−∣w∣2v,w) for v∈S1. By [F3], its exterior is {∣w∣≥a}. Put b=1−a2. The map Db2×S1→EK given by (z,u)↦(z,1−∣z∣2u) has inverse (z,w)↦(z,w/∣w∣), exhibiting a solid torus. Contracting the disk factor retracts it onto its core; a positive normal-disk meridian winds once around the circle factor, oriented accordingly. For a finite simple-spine certificate, triangulate the disk as a cone on a polygon. Collapse its triangles along their outer edges, then its radial edges at their outer vertices, leaving the center. In the product CW structure, perform each disk collapse first over the circle's 1-cell and then over its vertex. These elementary cellular collapses leave the core circle with one vertex and edge y, representing the positive meridian of [F4].

2.1F1F4step 1.1construct

Attaching a 1-cell x at that vertex and a 2-cell with attaching word x is an elementary expansion: the new 1-cell is a free face of the new 2-cell, so collapsing this pair returns the circle spine. Therefore ⟨x,y∣x⟩ is a valid based deficiency-one spine of the same exterior, in the sense of [F1]. The relation kills x in the fundamental group, so [F4] makes the full abelianization send x to 1 and the positive meridian y to its generator t.

3.1F1F2step 2.1algebra∎

The Fox derivatives of r=x are ∂r/∂x=1 and ∂r/∂y=0, so the row Fox matrix is J=[10]. By [F2], the d1 blocks are 0 for x and t−1 for y, making the localized complex 0→Q(t)→(1,0)Q(t)2→(0,t−1)TQ(t)→0 acyclic. Deleting the x column leaves the zero 1×1 minor and gives denominator 1−1=0, hence [F1] declares that quotient undefined. Deleting the y column leaves minor [1] and denominator t−1, so its quotient is 1/(t−1). This establishes the stated boundary case.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources