Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Lie algebra does not detect nonsmooth group schemes

Statement refuted

For a group scheme of finite type over a field k, the Lie algebra Lie⁡(G) determines whether G is smooth over k; equivalently, two group schemes of finite type over k with isomorphic Lie algebras are either both smooth or both nonsmooth.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a field k of characteristic p>0.

[F1]

Additive and infinitesimal group schemes: αp⊆Ga and μp⊆Gm are closed subgroup schemes, and the coordinate rings of αp and μp are isomorphic to k[s]/(sp) with nonzero nilpotent s; both are finite of length p over k, while Ga=Spec⁡k[t] and Gm=Spec⁡k[t,t−1] have reduced coordinate rings.

[F2]

Lie algebras of the additive, infinitesimal and general linear groups: Lie⁡(Ga)≅k≅Lie⁡(αp) as k-Lie algebras, and Lie⁡(Gm)≅k≅Lie⁡(μp); all four brackets vanish.

[F3]

Smooth morphism of schemes, Geometrically regular algebras and geometrically regular fibres and Regular points of locally Noetherian schemes: if X is smooth at a point x over the field k, then taking the trivial extension k/k in the geometric-regularity clause makes the local ring OX,x regular.

[F4]

regular local domain induction: assuming the Axiom of Choice, every regular local ring is an integral domain (The Axiom of Choice).

[F5]

Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps and Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres: a standard smooth presentation over k gives a flat morphism with geometrically regular fibres, hence smoothness; a localisation of a polynomial ring, such as k[t] or k[t,t−1], admits the standard smooth presentation with no equations and is finitely presented over the Noetherian field k by Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is finitely presented and A field has only the zero ideal and itself, hence is Noetherian (Locally finite presentation morphisms).

[F6]

Group schemes of finite type over a field: group schemes of finite type over k include the finite nonreduced examples of [F1].

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1F1F3F4algebra

The subgroup scheme αp is not smooth at its origin. Its coordinate ring is k[s]/(sp) with s≠0 and sp=0 by [F1], so it is not reduced. Every element outside (s) is a unit by a finite geometric sum, so localization at (s) leaves this ring unchanged and the class s remains nonzero. If αp were smooth at the origin, [F3] with the trivial extension k/k would make the local ring k[s]/(sp)(s) regular, and [F4] would make that ring an integral domain, contradicting s≠0 with sp=0; hence αp is not smooth over k. The same argument with the same coordinate ring, using s=t−1, shows that μp is not smooth over k.

1.2F5algebra

The ambient groups are smooth. The polynomial ring k[t] is a localisation of a polynomial ring and its Jacobian presentation has no equations, so it is standard smooth over k; by [F5] the morphism Ga→Spec⁡k is flat with geometrically regular fibres and locally of finite presentation over the Noetherian field k, hence smooth by definition. The same presentation with no equations applies to k[t,t−1]=(k[t])t, so Gm is smooth over k.

2.1F1F2F3F4F5F6step 1.1step 1.2∎

The Lie algebras agree. By [F2] there are isomorphisms of k-Lie algebras Lie⁡(αp)≅Lie⁡(Ga) and Lie⁡(μp)≅Lie⁡(Gm). Combining this with steps 1.1 and 1.2, the nonsmooth finite group scheme αp and the smooth group scheme Ga have isomorphic Lie algebras, and likewise for μp and Gm; therefore the Lie algebra of a group scheme of finite type over a field does not determine smoothness, and the refuted statement fails. Choice is inherited through the matrix-group and Lie-bracket suppliers [F1, F2], the regular-local-domain supplier [F4], and the standard-smoothness criterion [F5].

Remarks

The contrast is the standard illustration that the Lie algebra is a first-order invariant: it sees the cotangent space at the identity, which is one-dimensional for both αp and Ga, but it does not see the nilpotent thickness of k[s]/(sp). In characteristic 0 Cartier's theorem removes the phenomenon for group schemes of finite type.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

75 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources