Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Additive and infinitesimal group schemes

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice for the finite-type assertions inherited from the matrix-group supplier. Let k be a field. (a) Ga=Spec⁡k[t] with comultiplication Δ(t)=t⊗1+1⊗t, counit ε(t)=0 and antipode S(t)=−t is a group scheme of finite type over k with Ga(R)=(R,+) for every commutative k-algebra R. (b) If char⁡k=p>0, then αp=Spec⁡k[t]/(tp), with the comultiplication induced by that of Ga, is a closed subgroup scheme of Ga with αp(R)={a∈R:ap=0}, and μp=Spec⁡k[t,t−1]/(tp−1), with the comultiplication of the multiplicative group scheme (The general linear group scheme and its coordinate ring), is a closed subgroup scheme of Gm with μp(R)={a∈R×:ap=1}. The coordinate rings of αp and μp are isomorphic to k[s]/(sp) for s=t respectively s=t−1, so both are finite nonreduced k-schemes of length p, while Ga and Gm are reduced.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a field k, and in part (b) an integer p=char⁡k>0.

[F1]

Group schemes of finite type over a field: a group scheme over k is a finite-type k-scheme with multiplication, identity and inverse satisfying the group identities, and G(T)=Hom⁡k(T,G) carries a group law natural in T.

[F2]

Commutative Hopf algebras over a field: a commutative Hopf algebra is a commutative k-algebra with k-algebra maps Δ,ε,S satisfying coassociativity, the counit identities and the antipode identities.

[F3]

Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings and Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products: Spec⁡ is a contravariant equivalence from commutative k-algebras to affine k-schemes, and Spec⁡B×Spec⁡kSpec⁡C≅Spec⁡(B⊗kC); under the assumed Axiom of Choice, a commutative Hopf algebra that is finitely generated as a k-algebra therefore defines a group scheme of finite type in the convention of [F1], whose group law is induced by Δ.

[F4]

The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution: k[t] is the polynomial ring in one variable, with basis 1,t,t2,… as a k-vector space, and k[t,t−1] denotes the principal localisation at t.

[F5]

The general linear group scheme and its coordinate ring: Gm=GL⁡1=Spec⁡k[t,t−1] is the multiplicative group scheme with Δ(t)=t⊗t, ε(t)=1, S(t)=t−1 and Gm(R)=R×.

[F6]

Hopf ideals, kernels and quotients of commutative Hopf algebras: if a is a Hopf ideal of a commutative Hopf algebra A, then A/a carries a unique commutative Hopf algebra structure making A→A/a a morphism of Hopf algebras.

[F7]

A surjective ring map induces a closed immersion of affine spectra and Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes: a surjective homomorphism of commutative rings induces a closed immersion of affine spectra, and a closed subscheme whose coordinate map is a Hopf-algebra morphism and which is stable under the group laws is a closed subgroup scheme (Closed immersions of schemes).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F3F4algebra

The additive group. On the generator t of k[t], the assignments Δ(t)=t⊗1+1⊗t, ε(t)=0, S(t)=−t are algebra maps satisfying the Hopf identities of [F2]: both iterated comultiplications give t⊗1⊗1+1⊗t⊗1+1⊗1⊗t, the two counit composites give t, and the two antipode composites give S(t)⋅1+1⋅t=−t+t=0=ε(t)⋅1. Thus k[t] is a commutative Hopf algebra, so by [F3] Ga=Spec⁡k[t] is a group scheme, of finite type since k[t] is finitely generated over k by [F4]. For a commutative k-algebra R, Ga(R)=Hom⁡k(k[t],R)≅R via t↦a, and the group law induced by Δ sends the pair (a,b) to the homomorphism with t↦a⋅1+1⋅b=a+b, so Ga(R)=(R,+); since k[t] is an integral domain it is reduced.

1.2F1F2F3F4F5algebra

The multiplicative group. On k[t,t−1] the assignments Δ(t)=t⊗t, ε(t)=1, S(t)=t−1 are algebra maps satisfying the Hopf identities: Δ(t) and t are units with the stated inverses, both iterated comultiplications give t⊗t⊗t, the counit composites give t⋅1=t, and the antipode composites give t⋅t−1=1=ε(t). Hence k[t,t−1] is a commutative Hopf algebra and Gm=Spec⁡k[t,t−1] is the group scheme with Gm(R)=R× and group law multiplication, agreeing with [F5]; k[t,t−1] is a domain, so Gm is reduced.

1.3F1F2F3F5F6F7algebra

The infinitesimal schemes. Let char⁡k=p>0. The quotient algebras k[t]/(tp) and k[t,t−1]/(tp−1) are finitely generated over k, by the images of t and of t,t−1 respectively, so [F3] applies once their Hopf structures are established. The quotient map k[t]→k[t]/(tp) is a morphism of Hopf algebras: in k[t]/(tp)⊗k[t]/(tp) one has Δ(t)p=(t⊗1+1⊗t)p=tp⊗1+1⊗tp=0 because the intermediate binomial coefficients are divisible by p, so Δ descends; likewise ε(tp)=0 and S(t)p=(−t)p=−tp=0, so (tp) is a Hopf ideal and [F6] gives k[t]/(tp) a quotient Hopf algebra structure with αp=Spec⁡k[t]/(tp) a group scheme, the closed immersion αp↪Ga of [F7] being a morphism of group schemes. Similarly, in k[t,t−1]/(tp−1) one has Δ(t)p=tp⊗tp=1, ε(tp)=1 and S(t)p=(t−1)p=(tp)−1=1, so (tp−1) is a Hopf ideal and μp=Spec⁡k[t,t−1]/(tp−1) is a group scheme with a closed-immersion morphism μp↪Gm of group schemes. Evaluating on a commutative k-algebra R, a homomorphism k[t]/(tp)→R is the same as an element a, the image of t, with ap=0, and a homomorphism k[t,t−1]/(tp−1)→R is the same as a unit u with up=1; hence αp(R)={a∈R:ap=0} and μp(R)={u∈R×:up=1}.

1.4F4algebra

Length and nonreducedness. The ring k[t]/(tp) has k-basis 1,t,…,tp−1, so it is a finite k-algebra of dimension p and t≠0 is nilpotent; the substitution t=1+s identifies k[t,t−1]/(tp−1)≅k[s]/(sp) because (1+s)p−1=sp in characteristic p and t=1+s is a unit of k[s]/(sp) with inverse 1−s+s2−⋯+(−s)p−1; thus μp also has coordinate ring of length p with nonzero nilpotent s=t−1.

2.1F7step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3algebra

Closed subgroup schemes. By step 1.3 the addition formula of step 1.1 restricts on the quotient to the addition of the subset αp(R)⊆(R,+): it is closed under addition and negation because (a+b)p=ap+bp=0 and (−a)p=−ap=0 in characteristic p, and it contains 0; so αp(R) is a subgroup of (R,+) and the closed immersion αp↪Ga is a morphism of group schemes, making αp a closed subgroup scheme of Ga. Likewise the multiplication formula of step 1.2 restricts to the subset μp(R)⊆R×, which is closed under multiplication and inversion and contains 1, so μp is a closed subgroup scheme of Gm.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4step 2.1∎

Conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 1.2 produce Ga and Gm with their stated coordinate Hopf algebras, points and reducedness; step 1.3 produces the quotient Hopf algebra structures and the closed immersions defining αp and μp together with their point descriptions; step 1.4 computes both coordinate rings as k[s]/(sp), giving length p and nonreducedness; and step 2.1 identifies the induced group laws on the point sets, so that αp and μp are closed subgroup schemes.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources