How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hopf ideals, kernels and quotients of commutative Hopf algebras
Statement
Let be a field. (a) If is a morphism of commutative Hopf algebras over (Commutative Hopf algebras over a field), then is a Hopf ideal of , that is, an ideal (Left, right and two-sided ideals) with , and ; and is a Hopf subalgebra of . (b) Conversely, for every Hopf ideal the quotient ring (The quotient ring with ) carries a unique commutative Hopf algebra structure for which is a morphism of Hopf algebras, and every Hopf algebra morphism whose kernel contains factors uniquely through . (c) Every morphism of Hopf algebras factors as , uniquely up to a unique isomorphism. No choice principle is used.
Facts & Assumptions
A morphism of commutative Hopf algebras preserves , and , and a Hopf ideal is an ideal with , and . (Commutative Hopf algebras over a field, Left, right and two-sided ideals)
Quotient rings, their universal property, and the first isomorphism theorem for rings. (The quotient ring with , First isomorphism theorem for rings: )
The tensor universal property also gives the following -linear presentation: quotient the free -module on by the -span of the two additivity relations and , . This quotient has the same bilinear universal property as : a bilinear map extends by finite linear sums and kills precisely these generators. The maps in both directions sending generators to elementary tensors are inverse because generators span. (The tensor product from the additive group underlying the free -module on , elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums, Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups)
A finite spanning list can be reduced to a basis by deleting a vector whenever a nontrivial dependence relation expresses it as a combination of the others (divide by its nonzero coefficient). The length decreases at each deletion, so the process terminates with an independent spanning list. To extend a given independent list in such a span, append vectors from the spanning list only when they are not in the current span. (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis, Linear combination of a finite list, and the span as the smallest linear subspace containing , Linear independence: a finite list is independent when forces every , and a subset is independent when every injective finite list into is independent, Linear subspace of a vector space)
Tensoring the surjection with -vector spaces is right exact, so is contained in . (Tensoring is right exact)
Proof
Given: A field , commutative Hopf algebras over , and a morphism of commutative Hopf algebras, with .
(Coefficient criterion.) Let be -vector spaces, let be linearly independent and let satisfy in . Then . Indeed, by [F3] the element of the free module on is a finite -linear combination of finitely many bilinearity generators; let and be the spans of the initial together with all vectors occurring in that finite witness, so that are finite-dimensional and the same combination exhibits already in . By [F4] the independent list extends to a finite basis of with for , and has a finite basis ; the universal property [F3] gives an isomorphism with (both composites with the canonical maps are the identity on spanning sets). The image of is the matrix whose -th column is the coordinate vector of for and whose other columns vanish, so this matrix is zero by the assumed relation, and each is zero.
(Part (b).) Let be a Hopf ideal and let be the quotient map. Since , there are unique -algebra homomorphisms , and with , and , by the universal property of the quotient ring [F2] and because , and kill . The three Hopf identities for hold because they hold for and are surjective; this makes a Hopf algebra with a morphism, and any Hopf structure with that property must satisfy the three displayed identities, so it is unique. If is a Hopf morphism with , then induces with by [F2]; since is surjective and preserves , so does , and is the unique such map.
(Kernel of .) One has . The inclusion is [F5]. For , write an element of as and suppose . Choose a maximal linearly independent subfamily of the finite list ; by [F4] every remaining is a finite linear combination with . Then in , so step 1.1 gives for every . Moreover for , and the identity shows .
(Part (a).) If , then , so by step 2.1; further and , so . Hence is a Hopf ideal of . The same finite-relation argument identifies with its image in for every inclusion : a zero relation has a finite witness; in the resulting finite-dimensional spaces extend a basis of the span of the first factors in to a basis of the ambient first-factor space, and use the coordinate tensor matrices of step 1.1. Applying this in both factors makes injective. For one has , and , so is a Hopf subalgebra of with the induced structure maps.
(Part (c).) By step 3.1 the image is a Hopf subalgebra of and is a Hopf ideal, so by step 1.2 the quotient is a Hopf algebra; the map , , given by the first isomorphism theorem [F2], is a -algebra isomorphism preserving the three structure maps, since does and is surjective. Composing this isomorphism with the inclusion factors as a surjection followed by an injection of Hopf algebras; any such factorization is unique because the quotient map is an epimorphism and the inclusion is a monomorphism, which also forces the middle isomorphism to be unique.
Depends on
- Commutative Hopf algebras over a field
- Field
- Left, right and two-sided ideals
- Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis
- Linear combination of a finite list, and the span $\operatorname{span}(S)$ as the smallest linear subspace containing $S$
- Linear independence: a finite list $v : n \to V$ is independent when $\sum_{i<n} \lambda_i v_i = 0_V$ forces every $\lambda_i = 0_F$, and a subset $S \subseteq V$ is independent when every injective finite list into $S$ is independent
- Linear subspace of a vector space
- The quotient ring $R/I$ with $(r+I)(s+I)=rs+I$
- The tensor product $M\otimes_R N$ from the additive group underlying the free $\mathbb Z$-module on $M\times N$, elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums
- First isomorphism theorem for rings: $R/\ker f\cong\operatorname{im}f$
- Tensoring is right exact
- Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups
Used by
- Additive and infinitesimal group schemes Example
- The Hopf algebra of a split torus and its root-of-unity subgroups Example
- Upper unitriangular groups are unipotent, and the additive group is U₂ Example
- Coconnected Hopf algebras: the coordinate ring of Uₙ and passage to quotients Lemma
- Chevalley: every closed subgroup is a line stabilizer Theorem
- Closed subgroup schemes of an affine group scheme correspond to Hopf ideals Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Swanson (notes), J. Pevtsova (lecturer), Algebraic Groups Lecture Notes, University of Washington, Fall 2014 (standard reference, not scraped)