Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hopf ideals, kernels and quotients of commutative Hopf algebras

Statement

Let k be a field. (a) If f ⁣:A→B is a morphism of commutative Hopf algebras over k (Commutative Hopf algebras over a field), then ker⁡f is a Hopf ideal of A, that is, an ideal a (Left, right and two-sided ideals) with Δ(a)⊆A⊗a+a⊗A, ε(a)=0 and S(a)⊆a; and f(A) is a Hopf subalgebra of B. (b) Conversely, for every Hopf ideal a⊆A the quotient ring A/a (The quotient ring R/I with (r+I)(s+I)=rs+I) carries a unique commutative Hopf algebra structure for which A→A/a is a morphism of Hopf algebras, and every Hopf algebra morphism A→C whose kernel contains a factors uniquely through A/a. (c) Every morphism f ⁣:A→B of Hopf algebras factors as A↠A/ker⁡f≅f(A)↪B, uniquely up to a unique isomorphism. No choice principle is used.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A morphism of commutative Hopf algebras preserves Δ, ε and S, and a Hopf ideal is an ideal a with Δ(a)⊆A⊗a+a⊗A, ε(a)=0 and S(a)⊆a. (Commutative Hopf algebras over a field, Left, right and two-sided ideals)

[F2]

Quotient rings, their universal property, and the first isomorphism theorem for rings. (The quotient ring R/I with (r+I)(s+I)=rs+I, First isomorphism theorem for rings: R/ker⁡f≅im⁡f)

[F3]

The tensor universal property also gives the following k-linear presentation: quotient the free k-module on X×Y by the k-span of the two additivity relations and e(cx,y)−ce(x,y), e(x,cy)−ce(x,y). This quotient has the same bilinear universal property as X⊗kY: a bilinear map extends by finite linear sums and kills precisely these generators. The maps in both directions sending generators to elementary tensors are inverse because generators span. (The tensor product M⊗RN from the additive group underlying the free Z-module on M×N, elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums, Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups)

[F4]

A finite spanning list can be reduced to a basis by deleting a vector whenever a nontrivial dependence relation expresses it as a combination of the others (divide by its nonzero coefficient). The length decreases at each deletion, so the process terminates with an independent spanning list. To extend a given independent list in such a span, append vectors from the spanning list only when they are not in the current span. (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis, Linear combination of a finite list, and the span span⁡(S) as the smallest linear subspace containing S, Linear independence: a finite list v:n→V is independent when ∑i<nλivi=0V forces every λi=0F, and a subset S⊆V is independent when every injective finite list into S is independent, Linear subspace of a vector space)

[F5]

Tensoring the surjection A→f(A) with k-vector spaces is right exact, so A⊗a+a⊗A is contained in ker⁡(f⊗f). (Tensoring is right exact)

Proof

Given: A field k, commutative Hopf algebras A,B,C over k, and a morphism f ⁣:A→B of commutative Hopf algebras, with K=ker⁡f.

1.1F3F4

(Coefficient criterion.) Let X,H be k-vector spaces, let h1,…,hn∈H be linearly independent and let x1,…,xn∈X satisfy ∑ixi⊗hi=0 in X⊗kH. Then x1=⋯=xn=0. Indeed, by [F3] the element ∑ie(xi,hi) of the free module on X×H is a finite k-linear combination of finitely many bilinearity generators; let X0⊆X and H0⊆H be the spans of the initial xi,hi together with all vectors occurring in that finite witness, so that X0,H0 are finite-dimensional and the same combination exhibits ∑ixi⊗hi=0 already in X0⊗kH0. By [F4] the independent list h1,…,hn extends to a finite basis v1,…,vN of H0 with vi=hi for i≤n, and X0 has a finite basis u1,…,uM; the universal property [F3] gives an isomorphism X0⊗kH0→kM×N with ua⊗vb↦Eab (both composites with the canonical maps are the identity on spanning sets). The image of ∑ixi⊗hi is the matrix whose i-th column is the coordinate vector of xi for i≤n and whose other columns vanish, so this matrix is zero by the assumed relation, and each xi is zero.

1.2F1F2

(Part (b).) Let a⊆A be a Hopf ideal and let q ⁣:A→A/a be the quotient map. Since Δ(a)⊆ker⁡(A⊗kA→A/a⊗kA/a), there are unique k-algebra homomorphisms Δˉ ⁣:A/a→A/a⊗kA/a, εˉ ⁣:A/a→k and Sˉ ⁣:A/a→A/a with Δˉq=(q⊗q)Δ, εˉq=ε and Sˉq=qS, by the universal property of the quotient ring [F2] and because q⊗q, ε and qS kill a. The three Hopf identities for (Δˉ,εˉ,Sˉ) hold because they hold for (Δ,ε,S) and q,q⊗q,q⊗q⊗q are surjective; this makes A/a a Hopf algebra with q a morphism, and any Hopf structure with that property must satisfy the three displayed identities, so it is unique. If g ⁣:A→C is a Hopf morphism with a⊆ker⁡g, then g induces gˉ ⁣:A/a→C with gˉq=g by [F2]; since q is surjective and g preserves Δ,ε,S, so does gˉ, and gˉ is the unique such map.

2.1F5step 1.1algebra

(Kernel of f⊗f.) One has ker⁡(f⊗f)=A⊗K+K⊗A. The inclusion ⊇ is [F5]. For ⊆, write an element of A⊗kA as x=∑i=1nai⊗bi and suppose (f⊗f)(x)=0. Choose a maximal linearly independent subfamily (f(aj))j∈J of the finite list (f(a1),…,f(an)); by [F4] every remaining f(ai) is a finite linear combination ∑j∈Jcijf(aj) with cij∈k. Then ∑j∈Jf(aj)⊗(f(bj)+∑i∉Jcijf(bi))=0 in B⊗kB, so step 1.1 gives wj:=bj+∑i∉Jcijbi∈K for every j∈J. Moreover ai′:=ai−∑j∈Jcijaj∈K for i∉J, and the identity x=∑j∈Jaj⊗wj+∑i∉Jai′⊗bi shows x∈A⊗K+K⊗A.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra

(Part (a).) If x∈K, then (f⊗f)ΔA(x)=ΔBf(x)=0, so ΔA(x)∈ker⁡(f⊗f)=A⊗K+K⊗A by step 2.1; further εA(x)=εB(f(x))=0 and f(SA(x))=SB(f(x))=0, so SA(x)∈K. Hence K is a Hopf ideal of A. The same finite-relation argument identifies U⊗kH with its image in X⊗kH for every inclusion U⊆X: a zero relation has a finite witness; in the resulting finite-dimensional spaces extend a basis of the span of the first factors in U to a basis of the ambient first-factor space, and use the coordinate tensor matrices of step 1.1. Applying this in both factors makes f(A)⊗f(A)→B⊗B injective. For y=f(x)∈f(A) one has ΔB(y)=(f⊗f)ΔA(x)∈f(A)⊗f(A), εB(y)=εA(x) and SB(y)=f(SA(x))∈f(A), so f(A) is a Hopf subalgebra of B with the induced structure maps.

4.1F1F2step 1.2step 3.1∎

(Part (c).) By step 3.1 the image f(A) is a Hopf subalgebra of B and K is a Hopf ideal, so by step 1.2 the quotient A/K is a Hopf algebra; the map ιˉ ⁣:A/K→f(A), a+K↦f(a), given by the first isomorphism theorem [F2], is a k-algebra isomorphism preserving the three structure maps, since f does and q is surjective. Composing this isomorphism with the inclusion f(A)↪B factors f as a surjection followed by an injection of Hopf algebras; any such factorization is unique because the quotient map is an epimorphism and the inclusion is a monomorphism, which also forces the middle isomorphism to be unique.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources