CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-13

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

$0 \to Z \overset{\times 2}{\to} Z \to Z / 2 Z \to 0$ does not split

Statement refuted

The short exact sequence of $Z$ -modules $0 \to Z \overset{\times 2}{\to} Z \overset{q}{\to} Z / 2 Z \to 0$ does not split, where $q$ is reduction modulo two.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The displayed maps.

[F1]

A split short exact sequence has a section of its epimorphism, equivalently a retraction of its monomorphism (Split short exact sequences, sections, and retractions).

[L1]

Sections, retractions, and compatible direct-sum decompositions are equivalent for a short exact sequence (The splitting lemma for short exact sequences of modules).

Counterexample

technique · direct

1.1

Multiplication by two is injective, $q$ is surjective, and $\ker q = 2 Z$ , the image of multiplication by two; hence the sequence is short exact.

givenalgebra

1.2

If $s : Z / 2 Z \to Z$ were a section, put $x = s (1 + 2 Z)$ . Then $q (x) = 1 + 2 Z$ , so $x$ is odd, while $2 x = s (0) = 0$ , forcing $x = 0$ , a contradiction.

assume-hypF1algebra

2.1

Therefore no section exists, and [F1] and [L1] show that the short exact sequence does not split. Equivalently, a retraction $r$ would satisfy $2 r (1) = r (2) = 1$ .

step 1.1step 1.2F1L1∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 9 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

A. Kleshchev, Lectures on Abstract Algebra for Graduate Students, sections 3.6, 3.14, and 3.15 (standard reference, not scraped)
The Stacks Project, Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
P. Hekmati, Homological Algebra, section 3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)

0→Z→×2Z→Z/2Z→00→Z×2​Z→Z/2Z→0 does not split