ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-13

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

$0 \to A \to A \oplus C \to C \to 0$ is canonically split

Example

For left $R$ -modules $A, C$ , the sequence $0 \to A \overset{i}{\to} A \oplus C \overset{p}{\to} C \to 0,$ with $i (a) = (a, 0)$ and $p (a, c) = c$ , is canonically split by $s (c) = (0, c)$ and $r (a, c) = a$ .

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Left $R$ -modules $A, C$ and the displayed maps.

[F1]

The finite direct sum has coordinatewise operations (The direct sum of an indexed family of modules).

[F2]

A section satisfies $p \circ s = {id}_{C}$ , and a retraction satisfies $r \circ i = {id}_{A}$ (Split short exact sequences, sections, and retractions).

[L1]

A section or retraction splits a short exact sequence and identifies the middle module with $A \oplus C$ (The splitting lemma for short exact sequences of modules).

Verification

technique · direct

1.1

The map $i$ is injective, $p$ is surjective, and $\ker p = {(a, 0) : a \in A} = im i$ , so the sequence is short exact.

givenF1algebra

1.2

The formulas give $p (s (c)) = c$ and $r (i (a)) = a$ , so $s$ is a section and $r$ is a retraction by [F2].

F1F2algebra

2.1

By [L1] the sequence splits, and the resulting map $A \oplus C \to A \oplus C$ , $(a, c) \mapsto i (a) + s (c)$ , is the identity.

step 1.1step 1.2L1∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 14 results over 8 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

A. Kleshchev, Lectures on Abstract Algebra for Graduate Students, sections 3.6, 3.14, and 3.15 (standard reference, not scraped)
The Stacks Project, Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
P. Hekmati, Homological Algebra, section 3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)

0→A→A⊕C→C→00→A→A⊕C→C→0 is canonically split