How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Split short exact sequences, sections, and retractions
Definition
In a short exact sequence a section of is a homomorphism with , and a retraction of is a homomorphism with .
The sequence splits if it has a section, equivalently, as proved in The splitting lemma for short exact sequences of modules ↗, if it has a retraction or if its middle term is isomorphic to compatibly with and .
Depends on
Used by
- 0→ℤxrightarrow×2ℤ→ℤ/2ℤ→0 does not split Counterexample
- 0→ A→ A⊕ C→ C→0 is canonically split Example
- Every short exact sequence of modules splits False statement
- The splitting lemma for short exact sequences of modules Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 10 results over 5 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Kleshchev, Lectures on Abstract Algebra for Graduate Students, sections 3.6, 3.14, and 3.15 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
- P. Hekmati, Homological Algebra, section 3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)