How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Equivalent module-theoretic characterizations of semisimple rings
Statement
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, for a unital ring the following are equivalent: is semisimple; every left -module is semisimple; every short exact sequence of left -modules splits; and every left -module is projective. See A semisimple ring as a ring whose left regular module is semisimple.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Statement.
A unital ring is semisimple when its left regular module is semisimple. This is a left-module definition and uses no Jacobson radical. For the zero ring, the regular module is zero and hence semisimple; the Wedderburn-Artin theorem below is stated for nonzero rings. (A semisimple ring as a ring whose left regular module is semisimple).
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, every submodule and every quotient of a semisimple module is semisimple. (Under Choice, submodules and quotients of semisimple modules are semisimple).
For every left -module , the free module on its underlying set admits a canonical surjection , determined by . Consequently . (Every module is a quotient of a free module).
In a short exact sequence a section of is a homomorphism with , and a retraction of is a homomorphism with . (Split short exact sequences, sections, and retractions).
For a short exact sequence the following are equivalent: 1. has a section ; 2. has a retraction ; 3. there is an isomorphism with and . (The splitting lemma for short exact sequences of modules).
A left -module is projective if it has the lifting property for epimorphisms: whenever is a surjective module homomorphism and is a module homomorphism, there exists a module homomorphism such that (def-module-homomorphism-kernel-image-and-cokernel, def-injection-surjection-bijection). (Projective modules and the lifting property).
For a left -module , assertions 1 to 3 below are equivalent without choice. Under the Axiom of Choice, they are also equivalent to assertion 4: 1. is projective; 2. every short exact sequence splits; 3. takes every short exact sequence to a short exact sequence; 4. is a direct summand of a free module. (Equivalent characterizations of projective modules).
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a module is semisimple if and only if every submodule has a complementary submodule. (Equivalent characterizations of semisimple modules).
Proof
If is semisimple, every free left module, being a direct sum of copies of , is semisimple; every module is a quotient of a free module, so every left module is semisimple.
If every left module is semisimple, [L8] gives every submodule a complement, and the splitting lemma makes every short exact sequence split. Conversely, if every short exact sequence splits, the projective criterion makes every module projective; if every module is projective, each quotient map splits, so [L8] makes every module semisimple.
Applying the universal module condition to the left regular module recovers the first condition, and every clause is left-handed as asserted. This proves the stated claim.
Depends on
- A semisimple ring as a ring whose left regular module is semisimple
- Equivalent characterizations of semisimple modules
- Under Choice, submodules and quotients of semisimple modules are semisimple
- Every module is a quotient of a free module
- Split short exact sequences, sections, and retractions
- The splitting lemma for short exact sequences of modules
- Projective modules and the lifting property
- Equivalent characterizations of projective modules
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 46 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- William Crawley-Boevey, Noncommutative Algebra, Chapter 1 Sections 1.1-1.9 (standard reference, not scraped)