How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Equivalent module-theoretic characterizations of semisimple rings
Statement
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, for a unital ring the following are equivalent: is semisimple; every left -module is semisimple; every short exact sequence of left -modules splits; and every left -module is projective. See A semisimple ring as a ring whose left regular module is semisimple.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and objects in the Statement.
A unital ring is semisimple when its left regular module is semisimple. This is a left-module definition and uses no Jacobson radical. For the zero ring, the regular module is zero and hence semisimple; the Wedderburn-Artin theorem below is stated for nonzero rings. (A semisimple ring as a ring whose left regular module is semisimple).
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, every submodule and every quotient of a semisimple module is semisimple. (Under Choice, submodules and quotients of semisimple modules are semisimple).
For every left -module , the free module on its underlying set admits a canonical surjection , determined by . Consequently . (Every module is a quotient of a free module).
In a short exact sequence a section of is a homomorphism with , and a retraction of is a homomorphism with . (Split short exact sequences, sections, and retractions).
For a short exact sequence the following are equivalent: 1. has a section ; 2. has a retraction ; 3. there is an isomorphism with and . (The splitting lemma for short exact sequences of modules).
A left -module is projective if it has the lifting property for epimorphisms: whenever is a surjective module homomorphism and is a module homomorphism, there exists a module homomorphism such that (def-module-homomorphism-kernel-image-and-cokernel, def-injection-surjection-bijection). (Projective modules and the lifting property).
For a left -module , assertions 1 to 3 below are equivalent without choice. Under the Axiom of Choice, they are also equivalent to assertion 4: 1. is projective; 2. every short exact sequence splits; 3. takes every short exact sequence to a short exact sequence; 4. is a direct summand of a free module. (Equivalent characterizations of projective modules).
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a module is semisimple if and only if every submodule has a complementary submodule. (Equivalent characterizations of semisimple modules).
Assume The Axiom of Choice. Its actual use here is the AC-qualified semisimple complement and submodule/quotient results [L8] and [L2], whose proofs use Zorn's lemma. The canonical free cover [L3] and the splitting/projectivity equivalence in clauses 1–2 of [L7] are choice-free.
Proof
If is semisimple, fix a decomposition into simple left submodules. In the free module , put a copy of each in each coordinate . These simple submodules sum directly: any element has finite coordinate support and in each coordinate a finite decomposition in the , uniquely. Thus is semisimple. Every left module is a quotient of such a free module by [L3], hence is semisimple by the AC-qualified [L2].
If every left module is semisimple, [L8] under [L9] gives every submodule a complement, and [L5] makes every short exact sequence split. If every short exact sequence splits, clauses 1–2 of [L7] make every module projective. If every module is projective, apply those same clauses to every quotient map ; its splitting gives a complement to by [L5], so [L8] under [L9] makes every module semisimple.
Applying the universal module condition to the left regular module recovers the first condition, and every clause is left-handed as asserted. This proves the stated claim.
Remarks
These are left-module characterizations. Applying them to right modules requires a separately justified opposite-ring or left/right semisimplicity interface; injectivity is not an additional conclusion of this statement.
Depends on
- A semisimple ring as a ring whose left regular module is semisimple
- Equivalent characterizations of semisimple modules
- Under Choice, submodules and quotients of semisimple modules are semisimple
- Every module is a quotient of a free module
- Split short exact sequences, sections, and retractions
- The splitting lemma for short exact sequences of modules
- Projective modules and the lifting property
- Equivalent characterizations of projective modules
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- William Crawley-Boevey, Noncommutative Algebra, Chapter 1 Sections 1.1-1.9 (standard reference, not scraped)