Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Assuming choice, normality is not even finitely productive: two copies of the lower-limit line

Statement refuted

Assuming choice, the product of any finite family of normal spaces is normal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The lower-limit-line product theorem.

[L1]

Under choice, the lower-limit line is normal and its binary square is not normal (Assuming choice, normality is not productive: the normal lower-limit line has a nonnormal square).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Take two copies of the normal lower-limit line from [L1].

L1
2.1

Their binary product is not normal by [L1], refuting the claim already for a finite product.

L1step 1.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources