Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ordinary traces on p-singular elements are not determined by reduction

Statement refuted

False claim: the reduction of an integral representation determines its characteristic-zero character on every group element, including p-singular elements. Also false: equality of modular traces at g and its p-regular part implies equality of their operators.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A fixed splitting 2-modular system for C2 with generator t.

[F1]

The Brauer character is defined on p-regular elements (Lifted modular trace on p-regular elements).

[F2]

The trace agrees with that at the p-regular part (Modular trace depends only on the p-regular part).

Counterexample

1.1

Take the rank-one lattices L+=O and L=O with t acting by 1 and -1. These are representations since both scalars square to 1. Their reductions are both the trivial k-module because 1=1 in characteristic two. Their K-character values at t are 1 and -1, different because K has characteristic zero. The element t has order 2 and is p-singular, so this does not conflict with the domain of the Brauer character.

F1givenalgebra
2.1

On k2 take J=(1101). Then J2=I in characteristic two, JI, and tr(J)=0=tr(I). The p-regular part of t is 1. Thus the trace equality holds exactly as stated in the trace lemma while equality of operators fails. Both proposed conclusions have explicit counterexamples.

F2step 1.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources