Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Modular Traces and Brauer-Character Independence: Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The cyclic trace table is calculated as a Vandermonde matrix. Two explicit matrices give the characteristic-two simple modules of the symmetric group on three letters and their lifted trace rows. A pair of integral lattices for the cyclic group of order two shows why ordinary trace values on singular elements cannot be recovered from the reduced representation.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

A cyclic prime-to-p Brauer table

Example

Let Cm=g, m1, pm, in a splitting system. Choose a primitive mth root λk and write ζ=λ^. The simple modules Si for 0i<m have g acting by λi; their Brauer table is (ζij)0i,j<m.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The cyclic group, splitting system, and chosen primitive root in the Example.

[F1]

Brauer values are sums of unique multiplicative lifts of eigenvalues (Lifted modular trace on p-regular elements).

Verification

1.1

The eigenspace decomposition for g shows any simple module is one-dimensional with one of the m distinct eigenvalues; each scalar action gλi is a representation since (λi)m=1. Its value at gj is λij^=ζij. Distinct eigenvalues give nonisomorphic modules.

F1givenalgebra
2.1

The determinant is 0i<l<m(ζlζi). To obtain the formula, regard the determinant of (xij) as a polynomial in the xi: it vanishes when two xi coincide, has total degree m(m1)/2, and the coefficient of x1x22xm1m1 is 1, as is that of the displayed product. Hence they agree. Its factors are nonzero and their reductions λlλi are nonzero, so the determinant is a unit in O and is nonzero in both K and k. For m=1 the table is (1) and the product is empty, equal to 1.

step 1.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

The Brauer table of S3 in characteristic two

Example

In a splitting 2-modular system for S3, the trivial module and the natural two-dimensional module have Brauer rows (1,1) and (2,1) on the classes of 1 and (123); these exhaust the simple modules.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A splitting 2-modular system, with the matrices over the prime field embedded in k.

[F1]

Lift the eigenvalues individually to obtain Brauer values (Lifted modular trace on p-regular elements).

[F2]

Distinct simple Brauer characters are independent on p-regular conjugacy classes (Irreducible Brauer characters are independent on p-regular elements).

Verification

1.1

Set r=(0111) and t=(0110). Direct multiplication gives r2=(1110), r3=t2=I, and trt=r2. The six matrices I,r,r2,t,rt,r2t are distinct. Acting on the three nonzero vectors of F22 embeds this group in S3; its size six identifies it with S3.

givenalgebra
2.1

The polynomial of r is X2+X+1, with distinct nontrivial cube roots λ,λ2 in k. An invariant line for r must be one of its eigenlines. From rt=tr1, t sends the λ-eigenline to the λ1-eigenline, which is different. Hence no line is invariant under both; the two-dimensional representation is simple, and the same argument holds over every extension field.

step 1.1F1algebra
3.1

Writing ζ=λ^, the identity has value 2 and r has value ζ+ζ2=1, since ζ3=1 and ζ1. The trivial representation has values 1,1. Thus the determinant is 12=3, nonzero in K and with residue 1 in k.

F1step 2.1algebra
4.1

The p-regular permutations are the identity and the two conjugate 3-cycles, hence give exactly two classes. By independence at most two nonisomorphic simple modules can have characters on this two-dimensional space of class functions. The two already exhibited are nonisomorphic by dimension and simple, so exhaust the possibilities.

F2step 2.1step 3.1algebra
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Ordinary traces on p-singular elements are not determined by reduction

Statement refuted

False claim: the reduction of an integral representation determines its characteristic-zero character on every group element, including p-singular elements. Also false: equality of modular traces at g and its p-regular part implies equality of their operators.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A fixed splitting 2-modular system for C2 with generator t.

[F1]

The Brauer character is defined on p-regular elements (Lifted modular trace on p-regular elements).

[F2]

The trace agrees with that at the p-regular part (Modular trace depends only on the p-regular part).

Counterexample

1.1

Take the rank-one lattices L+=O and L=O with t acting by 1 and -1. These are representations since both scalars square to 1. Their reductions are both the trivial k-module because 1=1 in characteristic two. Their K-character values at t are 1 and -1, different because K has characteristic zero. The element t has order 2 and is p-singular, so this does not conflict with the domain of the Brauer character.

F1givenalgebra
2.1

On k2 take J=(1101). Then J2=I in characteristic two, JI, and tr(J)=0=tr(I). The p-regular part of t is 1. Thus the trace equality holds exactly as stated in the trace lemma while equality of operators fails. Both proposed conclusions have explicit counterexamples.

F2step 1.1algebra

Sources