How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Modular Traces and Brauer-Character Independence: Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inverse Limits and Noetherian Completion
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Modular Representations and Projective Covers
- Modular Traces and Brauer-Character Independence
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
The cyclic trace table is calculated as a Vandermonde matrix. Two explicit matrices give the characteristic-two simple modules of the symmetric group on three letters and their lifted trace rows. A pair of integral lattices for the cyclic group of order two shows why ordinary trace values on singular elements cannot be recovered from the reduced representation.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
A cyclic prime-to-p Brauer table
Example
Let , , , in a splitting system. Choose a primitive th root and write . The simple modules for have acting by ; their Brauer table is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The cyclic group, splitting system, and chosen primitive root in the Example.
Brauer values are sums of unique multiplicative lifts of eigenvalues (Lifted modular trace on p-regular elements).
Verification
The eigenspace decomposition for g shows any simple module is one-dimensional with one of the m distinct eigenvalues; each scalar action is a representation since . Its value at is . Distinct eigenvalues give nonisomorphic modules.
The determinant is . To obtain the formula, regard the determinant of as a polynomial in the : it vanishes when two coincide, has total degree , and the coefficient of is 1, as is that of the displayed product. Hence they agree. Its factors are nonzero and their reductions are nonzero, so the determinant is a unit in and is nonzero in both K and k. For the table is and the product is empty, equal to 1.
The Brauer table of S3 in characteristic two
Example
In a splitting -modular system for , the trivial module and the natural two-dimensional module have Brauer rows and on the classes of and ; these exhaust the simple modules.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A splitting 2-modular system, with the matrices over the prime field embedded in k.
Lift the eigenvalues individually to obtain Brauer values (Lifted modular trace on p-regular elements).
Distinct simple Brauer characters are independent on p-regular conjugacy classes (Irreducible Brauer characters are independent on p-regular elements).
Verification
Set and . Direct multiplication gives , , and . The six matrices are distinct. Acting on the three nonzero vectors of embeds this group in ; its size six identifies it with .
The polynomial of r is , with distinct nontrivial cube roots in k. An invariant line for r must be one of its eigenlines. From , t sends the -eigenline to the -eigenline, which is different. Hence no line is invariant under both; the two-dimensional representation is simple, and the same argument holds over every extension field.
Writing , the identity has value 2 and r has value , since and . The trivial representation has values 1,1. Thus the determinant is , nonzero in K and with residue 1 in k.
The p-regular permutations are the identity and the two conjugate 3-cycles, hence give exactly two classes. By independence at most two nonisomorphic simple modules can have characters on this two-dimensional space of class functions. The two already exhibited are nonisomorphic by dimension and simple, so exhaust the possibilities.
Ordinary traces on p-singular elements are not determined by reduction
Statement refuted
False claim: the reduction of an integral representation determines its characteristic-zero character on every group element, including p-singular elements. Also false: equality of modular traces at g and its p-regular part implies equality of their operators.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A fixed splitting 2-modular system for C2 with generator t.
The Brauer character is defined on p-regular elements (Lifted modular trace on p-regular elements).
The trace agrees with that at the p-regular part (Modular trace depends only on the p-regular part).
Counterexample
Take the rank-one lattices and with t acting by 1 and -1. These are representations since both scalars square to 1. Their reductions are both the trivial k-module because in characteristic two. Their K-character values at t are 1 and -1, different because K has characteristic zero. The element t has order 2 and is p-singular, so this does not conflict with the domain of the Brauer character.
On take . Then in characteristic two, , and . The p-regular part of t is 1. Thus the trace equality holds exactly as stated in the trace lemma while equality of operators fails. Both proposed conclusions have explicit counterexamples.