How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quadratics can have four roots over and
Statement refuted
Every nonzero quadratic over a commutative ring has at most two distinct roots.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The polynomials in and in .
The degree root bound holds for nonzero polynomials over integral domains (A nonzero polynomial of degree over an integral domain has at most distinct roots).
Over any commutative ring, is a root exactly when divides the polynomial (Factor theorem over a commutative ring).
The rings and are the corresponding quotient rings, so computations are modulo and (For every , the congruence-class ring is the quotient ring ).
Counterexample
Modulo , the four distinct residues satisfy , so they are roots of the nonzero quadratic .
Modulo , the four distinct odd residues have square congruent to , so they are roots of the nonzero quadratic ; these rings have zero divisors, so the domain hypothesis in [L1] fails and the statement is refuted.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 53 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Neil Donaldson, Math 120B Notes, Section 23, root-bound counterexample (standard reference, not scraped)