How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rational isotropy does not solve an integral representation problem
Statement refuted
Rational isotropy of a quadratic form does not by itself solve an integral representation problem for a related binary form.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rational Hasse-Minkowski theorem (Hasse-Minkowski theorem over Q).
Counterexample
The ternary form is rationally isotropic, for instance at the integer vector . This is consistent with Hasse-Minkowski theorem over Q, which is only a rational statement.
The related integral representation problem has no integer solution, because and the two factors must have the same parity, while every factorization of uses one odd factor and one even factor. So rational isotropy does not automatically produce an integral representation.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sam Raskin, Introduction to the Arithmetic Theory of Quadratic Forms, section 4.7 (standard reference, not scraped)