How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hilbert Symbols and the Quadratic Local Global Principle -- Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Absolute Values Completions and P Adic Numbers
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Analyticity of Holomorphic Functions; Liouville and Morera
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Arithmetic Functions and Dirichlet Convolution
- Average Orders Divisor Sums and Representation Counts
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chains, Antichains, Sperner and Dilworth
- Characters and the Orthogonality Relations
- Chebyshev Bounds and Mertens Theorems
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Dirichlet Characters L Functions and Primes in Progressions
- Dirichlet Series and Euler Products
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Probability and the Probabilistic Method
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hilbert Symbols and the Quadratic Local Global Principle
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper and Parameter-Dependent Multiple Integrals
- Improper Integrals
- Incidence Algebras and Möbius Inversion
- Infinite Products and the Weierstrass Factorisation Theorem
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Inverse Limits and Noetherian Completion
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Maschke's Theorem, Complete Reducibility and the Structure of k[G]
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- pi: the Equivalent Characterizations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Primitive Roots and Unit Groups Modulo N
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Quadratic Reciprocity and the Jacobi Symbol
- Quadratic Residues and the Legendre Symbol
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Solvability by Radicals and Kummer Theory
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Gamma Function
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Real Gamma and Beta Functions
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Riemann Zeta Function
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Hilbert symbols over the real numbers
Example
Over , the Hilbert symbol depends only on the signs of its two arguments:
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The real Hilbert-symbol formula and the equivalent solvability/norm interpretation (The real Hilbert symbol formula, Equivalent formulations of the Hilbert symbol).
Verification
The theorem The real Hilbert symbol formula gives value whenever at least one argument is positive, so .
The same theorem gives . Equivalently, the norm form from is , which never represents over , matching Equivalent formulations of the Hilbert symbol.
A Hilbert-symbol computation at an odd prime
Example
In , one has
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The odd-prime Hilbert-symbol formula (The odd-prime Hilbert symbol formula).
Verification
The nonzero square class modulo is only , so is a nonsquare and . Hence .
The two-adic Hilbert symbol table
Example
The two-adic formula gives, for instance,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The explicit formula for the Hilbert symbol over (The two-adic Hilbert symbol formula).
Verification
For , one has , , so and . The exponent in the theorem is therefore , and .
A local obstruction to a rational conic
Example
The conic
has no -point, and therefore no rational point.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ternary Hilbert-symbol criterion (Ternary isotropy via the Hilbert symbol).
Verification
The equation is the isotropy problem for , so Ternary isotropy via the Hilbert symbol says it is locally soluble over exactly when .
Write twice in the odd-prime formula. Then , so the form is not isotropic over . Therefore the conic has no -point and hence no rational point.
Finite bad places for a ternary form
Example
For the ternary form
the only primes that can require an explicit local check are .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The ternary Hilbert-symbol criterion and the almost-all-primes isotropy theorem (Ternary isotropy via the Hilbert symbol, Almost all local completions are isotropic in dimension at least three).
Verification
The diagonal coefficients of are , so the only primes dividing are . The theorem Almost all local completions are isotropic in dimension at least three guarantees that only finitely many primes can be bad; the exact finite list for this form is determined in the next step.
The criterion Ternary isotropy via the Hilbert symbol reduces the local question to the single symbol . For both arguments are -adic units, so the odd-prime formula gives value . Thus every prime outside is good, and only need separate local computation.
The one-place principle in action
Example
For the ternary form
the unknown -adic local value is forced by the values at the other places.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-place principle for ternary forms (One local place is determined by the others for ternary forms).
Verification
The criterion for is the symbol . At the real place this is because both arguments are positive. At every odd prime , both arguments are units, so the odd-prime formula gives .
Since every place except possibly gives value , One local place is determined by the others for ternary forms forces the remaining -adic value also to be . Hence is isotropic over without a separate direct computation there; globally, is the corresponding visible isotropic vector.
A quaternary Hasse-Minkowski calculation
Example
The quaternary form
is isotropic over .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The global square-class approximation lemma and the Hasse-Minkowski theorem (Global approximation of finitely many square classes, Hasse-Minkowski theorem over Q).
Verification
The two binary subforms and both represent the common value : indeed and . No approximation lemma is needed in this concrete instance because the common rational value is already explicit.
Substituting these representations gives , so is a rational isotropic vector. This concrete calculation is exactly what Hasse-Minkowski theorem over Q guarantees once the local square classes have been matched.
Selmer's cubic is locally soluble but globally insoluble
Statement refuted
The Hasse-Minkowski local-global principle for quadratic forms does not extend to arbitrary cubic curves.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The simple-root -adic lifting theorem (Simple roots lift uniquely in Z_p).
If has a simple root modulo , then that root lifts uniquely to (Simple roots lift uniquely in Z_p).
If and satisfy , Newton's criterion produces a -adic root (Newton's criterion in Q_p).
Counterexample
Consider Selmer's cubic . It has a real point because the one-variable equation has a real root, giving . It has a -adic point because satisfies and , so [L1] lifts the mod- root and yields a point in . It has a -adic point because , so for one has ; [L2] therefore gives a -adic root of , and then lies on the cubic. It has a -adic point because satisfies and , so [L1] yields a -adic root , giving the point .
Conrad's cited note proves that Selmer's cubic has local points over every remaining but no nontrivial rational point over . Thus the curve is locally soluble at every completion while globally insoluble, refuting any naive extension of Hasse-Minkowski from quadratic forms to cubic curves.
Rational isotropy does not solve an integral representation problem
Statement refuted
Rational isotropy of a quadratic form does not by itself solve an integral representation problem for a related binary form.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rational Hasse-Minkowski theorem (Hasse-Minkowski theorem over Q).
Counterexample
The ternary form is rationally isotropic, for instance at the integer vector . This is consistent with Hasse-Minkowski theorem over Q, which is only a rational statement.
The related integral representation problem has no integer solution, because and the two factors must have the same parity, while every factorization of uses one odd factor and one even factor. So rational isotropy does not automatically produce an integral representation.
Sources
- Andrew V. Sutherland, 18.782 Lecture 10
- Andrew V. Sutherland, 18.782 Lecture 10, Theorem 10.7
- Andrew V. Sutherland, 18.782 Lecture 10, Theorem 10.9
- Andrew V. Sutherland, 18.782 Lecture 11
- Andrew V. Sutherland, 18.782 Lecture 11, Corollary 11.13
- Andrew V. Sutherland, 18.782 Lecture 11, Theorem 11.17
- Keith Conrad, Selmer's Example
- Sam Raskin, Introduction to the Arithmetic Theory of Quadratic Forms, section 4.7