How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A quaternary Hasse-Minkowski calculation
Example
The quaternary form
is isotropic over .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The global square-class approximation lemma and the Hasse-Minkowski theorem (Global approximation of finitely many square classes, Hasse-Minkowski theorem over Q).
Verification
The two binary subforms and both represent the common value : indeed and . No approximation lemma is needed in this concrete instance because the common rational value is already explicit.
Substituting these representations gives , so is a rational isotropic vector. This concrete calculation is exactly what Hasse-Minkowski theorem over Q guarantees once the local square classes have been matched.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew V. Sutherland, 18.782 Lecture 11, Theorem 11.17 (standard reference, not scraped)