Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exterior-sphere domains need not have global C2alpha Dirichlet solutions

Statement refuted

The following assertion is false under the library's bounded global Hölder norm: every bounded Lipschitz domain satisfying an exterior sphere condition at each boundary point, with a strictly elliptic operator having Hölder coefficients and nonpositive expanded zero-order coefficient, has for every Hölder forcing and continuous Dirichlet data a unique solution in C2,α(U)∩C0(Uˉ).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: 0<α<1 and the source's claimed C2,α(U)∩C0(Uˉ) solution class.

[F1]

The library's C2,α(U) is the bounded global Hölder class; its norm includes the supremum of every second derivative over all of U (Hölder spaces Ck,α, closure and interior scaled norms, and Ck,α domains).

[F2]

For L=Δ, a bounded-domain function w∈C2(U)∩C0(Uˉ) with Δw=0 and w∣∂U=0 vanishes identically (Elliptic residual and boundary stability from a maximum principle).

[F3]

The locally proved radial profile χ is smooth, equals 1 for r≤1/4, and equals 0 for r≥1/2 (A smooth radial profile with a prescribed inner plateau).

[F4]

The Laplacian of a scalar C2 function on an open subset of R2 is wxx+wyy (The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field).

[F5]

The total chain rule applies to the smooth local polar-coordinate change on r>0 (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)).

Counterexample

1.1givencases

Let U={(rcos⁡θ,rsin⁡θ):0<r<1, 0<θ<2π/3}. It is bounded and Lipschitz: its boundary consists of two line segments and a circular arc, meeting at finitely many corners of angles 2π/3 and π/2. At a smooth boundary point, a sufficiently small ball tangent on the exterior side is disjoint from U; on the circular arc one can use a ball outside the unit disk. At a corner of interior angle β<π, choose a ball tangent at the corner with its center on the exterior angle bisector. Directions from the vertex to points in this ball lie within angle π/2 of the center direction, while the sector directions are at angular distance at least π−β/2>π/2; hence the ball is exterior. Therefore U satisfies the exterior sphere condition everywhere.

1.2givenF3F4F5algebra

Let χ be the profile supplied by [F3]. Set u(r,θ)=χ(r)r3/2sin⁡(3θ/2),L=Δ,f=Δu,g=0. Since r>0 on U, u∈C∞(U). It extends continuously by zero at the vertex, vanishes on both straight sides because the sine factor vanishes, and vanishes on the circular arc because χ(1)=0. To compute Δw for any C2 function in local polar coordinates, write c=cos⁡θ and s=sin⁡θ. The chain rule [F5] gives wxx=c2wrr+s2rwr+s2r2wθθ−2scrwrθ+2scr2wθ,wyy=s2wrr+c2rwr+c2r2wθθ+2scrwrθ−2scr2wθ. By [F4], adding yields Δw=wrr+r−1wr+r−2wθθ. For w=r3/2sin⁡(3θ/2), these derivatives are wr=32r1/2sin⁡(3θ/2), wrr=34r−1/2sin⁡(3θ/2), and wθθ=−94r3/2sin⁡(3θ/2), so the polar Laplacian is zero on r<1/4. On the annulus where χ varies, r is bounded away from zero and all factors are smooth; outside r<1/2, u=0. Thus f is smooth and supported in 1/4≤r≤1/2. The domain U is convex, so boundedness of ∇f gives a Lipschitz bound on f along each segment in U; since U is bounded and 0<α<1, this implies f∈C0,α(U).

2.1step 1.2F1algebra

Along the ray θ=π/3 and for 0<r<1/4, ∂rru=(3/4)r−1/2, which is unbounded as r↓0. A bounded global C2,α norm bounds every Cartesian second derivative and hence every unit-direction second derivative, so [F1] implies u∉C2,α(U). The coefficients of L=Δ are smooth, the ellipticity constant is 1, and the expanded zero-order coefficient is 0≤0.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1F2algebra∎

The displayed u is a classical solution in C2(U)∩C0(Uˉ) of Δu=f with zero Dirichlet data. Any other solution in that class differs from u by a zero-boundary harmonic function, which vanishes by [F2]. Hence it is the unique classical solution, and no solution in the asserted global C2,α(U)∩C0(Uˉ) class exists. This refutes the assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources