How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Elliptic PINN minimizers converge to the Dirichlet solution
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. Use the corrected small-scale sampling, trial-class, exact-zero-witness, and exact regularization hypotheses of the regularized PINN theorem, with residual and boundary operators and boundary restriction. Require every admitted trial function in to belong to . Let and let be bounded Lipschitz with an exterior sphere at every boundary point. For , let have minimum eigenvalue at least , let and , and put All indicated Hölder norms are finite global norms. Retain the source coefficient bounds and . Let and . There is exactly one with and on .
Every sequence of global regularized empirical minimizers converges to in almost surely as both sample counts tend to infinity. If , the occupancy-event squared uniform error is , with the probability and constants of the regularized-loss theorem. If each minimizer satisfies the boundary data exactly, the errors belong to and converge to zero in almost surely. If in addition is and has a lifting, the usual global branch applies with its stated coefficient/data hypotheses. No global Hölder regularity is claimed from the exterior-sphere condition alone, and no optimizer convergence is asserted.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated coefficient, sampling, witness, global-minimizer, and choice hypotheses.
The elliptic theorem gives unique local-Hölder classical existence with continuous boundary attainment, the smooth-boundary global branch under its extra hypotheses, and membership of every zero-boundary classical solution whose forcing is globally Hölder (Exterior-sphere elliptic Dirichlet existence, energy and residual stability).
The populated-cell proof gives both residual errors tending uniformly to zero almost surely, without weight comparability, and its quantitative occupancy-event bounds (Regularized PINN minimizers have vanishing residuals under sample refinement).
The actual expanded coefficients satisfy the residual-stability estimate for any error (Shin's positive divergence-form operator, Elliptic residual and boundary stability from a maximum principle).
The source coefficient bound and membership give the elliptic energy estimate (Elliptic H1 error estimate from the source coefficient bound).
The Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice are inherited from the existence supplier; the zero-boundary closure/energy convention retains Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
The finite global norms of make globally bounded and Hölder, with . Thus [F1] yields the unique solution in the stated local class. Apply [F3] to , whose boundary values are and whose forcing is . It gives . Both terms tend to zero almost surely by [F2]. Squaring this estimate transfers the occupancy-event rate and its event probability to the solution error. The constant may depend on the bounded expanded coefficients and thus their derivative bounds, not only .
If the boundary data are exact, has zero boundary value and . The zero-boundary assertion in [F1] gives ; this is proved by zero extensions of the smooth approximants and weak convergence, not inferred from continuity alone. Since , step 1.1 and [F2] imply . Apply [F4] to obtain . This statement is about the errors, and remains meaningful even if the individual nonzero-data solution is not in .
Under the extra smooth-boundary/data hypotheses, [F1] supplies the stated global regularity branch for this same unique solution. The native sector counterexample refutes extending that conclusion to every exterior-sphere Lipschitz domain. This completes all the stated convergence and regularity assertions.
Remarks
The source's stronger global existence assertion for exterior-sphere domains is false for its own globally bounded Hölder convention; the native cutoff-sector counterexample is retained. The exact original carrier is archived in the proposal. The active divergence formula counts once, consistently with the expanded coefficients and energy calculation; the original repeated-index printed expression is recorded in the operator definition's source discrepancy. The minimizer conclusion uses the repaired populated-cell proof and the corrected small-scale sampling convention, with no hidden balance premise.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Shin's positive divergence-form operator
- Elliptic residual and boundary stability from a maximum principle
- Elliptic H1 error estimate from the source coefficient bound
- Exterior-sphere elliptic Dirichlet existence, energy and residual stability
- Regularized PINN minimizers have vanishing residuals under sample refinement
- The PINN regularization thresholds need not be comparable under the stated count condition
- Exterior-sphere domains need not have global C2alpha Dirichlet solutions
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.