How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Parabolic PINN minimizers converge to the initial-boundary solution
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. Let be nonempty, bounded and open with an exterior ball at every spatial boundary point, , and . Use the full parabolic coefficient/data hypotheses of the variable-coefficient existence theorem: differentiability of , symmetry and uniform ellipticity, the source weighted parabolic Hölder coefficient bounds, bounded locally parabolic Hölder expanded drift and potential, bounded locally parabolic Hölder forcing, compatible Hölder initial and lateral data, and one-sided local Hölder control at interior points of the final face. Use Retain the source pointwise bounds with constants and its auxiliary condition ; the direct parabolic time barrier also works without that auxiliary condition. Boundedness is part of the source's order-zero Hölder norm, not a consequence of its weighted bound alone.
Use the corrected small-scale sampling, data/trial-class, exact-zero-witness and exact regularization assumptions of the regularized PINN theorem in the ambient dimension , with residual , target , and restriction to the initial-lateral boundary with target combining the compatible data. Require . The Euclidean Hölder assumptions in this sampling interface are retained in addition to the parabolic PDE regularity assumptions. There is one classical solution , locally parabolic Hölder in its displayed derivatives, to and the prescribed data.
Every sequence of global empirical regularized minimizers converges to in almost surely as both counts tend to infinity. For , the occupancy-event squared uniform solution error is , with the probability and constants of the regularized-loss theorem at dimension . If all minimizers satisfy both initial and lateral data exactly and the displayed divergence expansion agrees distributionally with the classical operator (in particular if are spatially locally), then their errors belong to and tend to zero in almost surely. The energy conclusion uses the actual bounded divergence coefficients and their source bound. No closed-cylinder regularity of or convergence of an optimizer is asserted.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The parabolic problem, full sampling and exact regularizer hypotheses, global minimizers and choice assumptions in the Statement.
The local variable-coefficient construction gives the unique classical solution with continuous initial/lateral/final boundary attainment and the residual stability estimate (Variable-coefficient parabolic initial-boundary existence and residual stability, Variable-coefficient parabolic residual and boundary stability, Shin's parabolic operator, data, and initial-lateral boundary).
The populated-cell theorem gives uniform convergence of the PDE and prescribed-data residuals almost surely, together with its count-dependent occupancy-event rate; weight comparability is not a premise (Regularized PINN minimizers have vanishing residuals under sample refinement).
A zero-data locally classical continuous error for the weak-compatible divergence operator has finite variational energy and zero initial trace (Zero-data bounded classical parabolic errors are weak energy solutions).
The variational zero-spatial-trace energy estimate applies in that class (Parabolic L2 energy estimate with zero initial-lateral trace).
The existence and compactness suppliers carry AC and CC; the Sobolev energy-space convention carries CC (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Apply [F1] under the full stated PDE hypotheses to obtain . For the equation is with , and its boundary values are . The residual stability estimate gives . By [F2] both terms tend to zero almost surely. Squaring this estimate transfers the occupied-cell error bound and its event probability to the solution error. With , the count specialization in [F2] is exactly the one displayed here.
Under exact initial and lateral data the errors have zero classical prescribed values and bounded globally Hölder residuals. Under the explicit weak-compatible divergence hypothesis, [F3] identifies each with the zero-initial variational Dirichlet solution, so with the required time derivative in the dual space. There is no inference from continuous zero trace alone. Since has finite volume, [F2] implies . Apply [F4] with to get both and . Their sum implies the asserted convergence.
Remarks
The source's pointwise word “differentiable” is retained for its classical problem. Its integration-by-parts energy argument additionally uses the weak divergence identity; this requirement is explicit here, with local spatial as a sufficient interpretation. Merely continuous zero boundary data do not prove energy membership. The new energy-identification helper supplies that separate step once the divergence equation has its intended weak meaning. The source's unusual weighted convention is preserved in the definition; this theorem does not claim that the limiting continuous-data solution has the printed weighted global trial norm.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Zero-data bounded classical parabolic errors are weak energy solutions
- Shin's parabolic operator, data, and initial-lateral boundary
- Variable-coefficient parabolic residual and boundary stability
- Parabolic L2 energy estimate with zero initial-lateral trace
- Variable-coefficient parabolic initial-boundary existence and residual stability
- Regularized PINN minimizers have vanishing residuals under sample refinement
- The PINN regularization thresholds need not be comparable under the stated count condition
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.