How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Parabolic L2 energy estimate with zero initial-lateral trace
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be bounded and open, , , and let with , for some , and real measurable bounded with the spatial derivatives needed for the displayed divergence form. Let , , and let have weak derivative and satisfy weakly. Use its continuous representative for the initial datum and endpoint norms. The source application has . Then there is , depending only on , , and the coefficient bounds, such that The spatial zero trace is the stated membership almost everywhere in time. In particular, the estimate applies to locally classical continuous errors once their energy-space membership and weak equation have been established; no closed-cylinder derivatives are required.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The coefficient bounds, uniform ellipticity, zero spatial trace, initial trace, and the variational solution of the inhomogeneous error equation.
Countable Choice is assumed by the zero-boundary Sobolev closure convention used for each spatial slice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (), Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure).
On the real evolution triple the energy identity gives almost everywhere, and the squared norm is absolutely continuous; it is proved by Bochner time mollification (The evolution-space energy identity and continuous H trace, Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space). The required triple on every bounded open set is supplied by The zero-boundary Sobolev evolution triple on an arbitrary bounded open set.
The principal matrix satisfies by its pointwise ellipticity hypothesis.
The parabolic convention has initial and lateral boundary data on (Shin's parabolic operator, data, and initial-lateral boundary).
is the -closure of (Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure).
Proof
Proof strategy: multiply by the error, integrate by parts, absorb lower-order terms, and apply Gronwall's inequality.
For almost every , by [F4], approximate in by compactly supported smooth functions. For each approximant the distributional definition of the divergence terms gives the spatial integration-by-parts identity; the coefficient bounds make every pairing continuous in , so passing to the limit produces no boundary term because . Pair the weak equation against in and use [F1] and [F2]. Moving the time derivative to the left gives where .
By Young's inequality, the first product on the right is at most and the last product is at most , for a finite depending only on the coefficient bounds and . Hence for ,
Dropping the nonnegative gradient term in step 2.1 and multiplying by gives . Integrating from to any yields
Integrating step 2.1 from to and using step 3.1 gives Combining this with step 3.1 and dividing by proves the stated estimate after increasing the constant.
Depends on
- Shin's parabolic operator, data, and initial-lateral boundary
- Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The zero-boundary Sobolev evolution triple on an arbitrary bounded open set
- The evolution-space energy identity and continuous H trace
- Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Shin, Darbon, and Karniadakis, On the Convergence of Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Linear Second-Order Elliptic and Parabolic Type PDEs (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (standard reference, not scraped)