Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Parabolic L2 energy estimate with zero initial-lateral trace

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let U⊂Rd be bounded and open, T>0, Q=U×(0,T), and let Lt[e]=∑i,j=1dDi(aijDje)+∑i=1dDi(bie)+∑iciDie+de with aij=aji, a(x,t)≥λ0I for some λ0>0, and real measurable a,b,c,d bounded with the spatial derivatives needed for the displayed divergence form. Let V=H01(U), H=L2(U), and let e∈L2(0,T;V) have weak derivative et∈L2(0,T;V∗) and satisfy −et+Lt[e]=r∈L2(U×(0,T)) weakly. Use its continuous H representative for the initial datum e(0) and endpoint norms. The source application has e(0)=0. Then there is CE<∞, depending only on T, λ0, and the coefficient bounds, such that sup⁡0≤t≤T∥e(t)∥L2(U)2+∫0T∥∇e(t)∥L2(U)2 dt≤CE(∥e(0)∥L2(U)2+∥r∥L2(Q)2). The spatial zero trace is the stated V membership almost everywhere in time. In particular, the estimate applies to locally classical continuous errors once their energy-space membership and weak equation have been established; no closed-cylinder derivatives are required.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The coefficient bounds, uniform ellipticity, zero spatial trace, initial L2 trace, and the variational solution e of the inhomogeneous error equation.

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed by the zero-boundary Sobolev closure convention used for each spatial slice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure).

[F1]

On the real evolution triple the energy identity gives ⟨et,e⟩=12ddt∥e(t)∥L2(U)2 almost everywhere, and the squared norm is absolutely continuous; it is proved by Bochner time mollification (The evolution-space energy identity and continuous H trace, Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space). The required triple on every bounded open set is supplied by The zero-boundary Sobolev evolution triple on an arbitrary bounded open set.

[F2]

The principal matrix satisfies ∫UaijDjeDie dx≥λ0∥∇e∥L2(U)2 by its pointwise ellipticity hypothesis.

[F3]

The parabolic convention has initial and lateral boundary data on ΓT (Shin's parabolic operator, data, and initial-lateral boundary).

[F4]

H01(U) is the H1-closure of Cc∞(U) (Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure).

Proof

Proof strategy: multiply by the error, integrate by parts, absorb lower-order terms, and apply Gronwall's inequality.

1.1givenA1F1F2F3F4algebra

For almost every t, by [F4], approximate e(⋅,t) in H1(U) by compactly supported smooth functions. For each approximant the distributional definition of the divergence terms gives the spatial integration-by-parts identity; the coefficient bounds make every pairing continuous in H1, so passing to the limit produces no boundary term because e(⋅,t)∈H01(U). Pair the weak equation −et+Lt[e]=r against e in V∗,V and use [F1] and [F2]. Moving the time derivative to the left gives 12E′(t)+λ0∥∇e(t)∥22≤(∥b∥∞+∥c∥∞)∥e(t)∥2∥∇e(t)∥2+∥d∥∞E(t)+∥r(t)∥2∥e(t)∥2, where E(t)=∥e(t)∥22.

2.1step 1.1algebra

By Young's inequality, the first product on the right is at most λ04∥∇e∥22+C1E(t) and the last product is at most 12∥r(t)∥22+12E(t), for a finite C1 depending only on the coefficient bounds and λ0. Hence for C2=C1+∥d∥∞+12, E′(t)+λ0∥∇e(t)∥22≤2C2E(t)+∥r(t)∥22.

3.1step 2.1algebra

Dropping the nonnegative gradient term in step 2.1 and multiplying by e−2C2t gives ddt(e−2C2tE(t))≤e−2C2t∥r(t)∥22. Integrating from 0 to any s≤T yields sup⁡0≤s≤TE(s)≤e2C2T(E(0)+∥r∥L2(Q)2).

4.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

Integrating step 2.1 from 0 to T and using step 3.1 gives λ0∫0T∥∇e(t)∥22dt≤E(0)+2C2Tsup⁡0≤t≤TE(t)+∥r∥L2(Q)2. Combining this with step 3.1 and dividing by λ0>0 proves the stated estimate after increasing the constant.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources