Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The evolution-space energy identity and continuous H trace

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let (V,H,V∗) be the real evolution triple of Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space, and let u,v∈W(0,T;V). Each has a unique representative in C([0,T];H), and for all 0≤s≤t≤T, ∥u(t)∥H2−∥u(s)∥H2=2∫st⟨u′(r),u(r)⟩V∗,V dr, (u(t),v(t))H−(u(s),v(s))H=∫st(⟨u′(r),v(r)⟩V∗,V+⟨v′(r),u(r)⟩V∗,V) dr. Writing ci=∥i:V→H∥, the trace obeys sup⁡0≤t≤T∥u(t)∥H2≤ci2T∥u∥L2(0,T;V)2+2∥u′∥L2(0,T;V∗)∥u∥L2(0,T;V).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real evolution triple, T>0, and u,v∈W(0,T;V).

[F1]

W(0,T;V) consists of u∈L2(0,T;V) with weak derivative u′∈L2(0,T;V∗); the embedding V→H is continuous (Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).

[F2]

Each such u admits smooth V-valued approximants converging in L2(V) whose time derivatives converge to u′ in L2(V∗) (Time mollification preserves the evolution-space derivative).

[A1]

Proof

1.1F1given

For a smooth V-valued function w, the continuous inclusion into H and the ordinary product rule give ddt∥w(t)∥H2=2(w′(t),w(t))H=2⟨w′(t),w(t)⟩V∗,V by the canonical embedding Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1choose

For smooth w, choose s with ∥w(s)∥H2≤T−1∥w∥L2(H)2. Integrating step 1.1 from s to any t gives sup⁡t∥w(t)∥H2≤T−1ci2∥w∥L2(V)2+2∥w′∥L2(V∗)∥w∥L2(V). Apply this to differences of the approximants in [F2]; they are Cauchy in C([0,T];H). Their uniform limit is continuous and agrees with u almost everywhere by their L2(H) convergence. The same bound passes to the limit.

2.2A1F2step 1.1algebra

For approximants un from [F2], integrate step 1.1 between arbitrary s,t. Uniform H convergence passes the two endpoint norms to those of the continuous representative. The integrands converge in L1 because ∥⟨un′,un⟩−⟨u′,u⟩∥L1≤∥un′−u′∥L2(V∗)∥un∥L2(V)+∥u′∥L2(V∗)∥un−u∥L2(V), whose right-hand side tends to zero. This proves the energy identity for all s,t.

3.1step 2.2algebra

Apply the energy identity from step 2.2 to u+v and u−v, subtract, and use the real polarization identity ∥u+v∥H2−∥u−v∥H2=4(u,v)H. Bilinearity gives the asserted integration-by-parts identity.

4.1A1F1F2step 2.1∎

The trace estimate is the smooth bound in step 2.1 passed through the uniform approximation in [F2], with ∥u∥L2(H)≤ci∥u∥L2(V). If two continuous representatives agree almost everywhere, their difference is continuous and zero on a dense subset of [0,T], hence zero everywhere; the representative is unique.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources