How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The evolution-space energy identity and continuous H trace
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be the real evolution triple of Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space, and let . Each has a unique representative in , and for all , Writing , the trace obeys
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real evolution triple, , and .
consists of with weak derivative ; the embedding is continuous (Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).
Each such admits smooth -valued approximants converging in whose time derivatives converge to in (Time mollification preserves the evolution-space derivative).
Countable Choice is assumed by the time-mollification supplier Time mollification preserves the evolution-space derivative (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
For a smooth -valued function , the continuous inclusion into and the ordinary product rule give by the canonical embedding Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space.
For smooth , choose with . Integrating step 1.1 from to any gives Apply this to differences of the approximants in [F2]; they are Cauchy in . Their uniform limit is continuous and agrees with almost everywhere by their convergence. The same bound passes to the limit.
For approximants from [F2], integrate step 1.1 between arbitrary . Uniform convergence passes the two endpoint norms to those of the continuous representative. The integrands converge in because whose right-hand side tends to zero. This proves the energy identity for all .
Apply the energy identity from step 2.2 to and , subtract, and use the real polarization identity . Bilinearity gives the asserted integration-by-parts identity.
The trace estimate is the smooth bound in step 2.1 passed through the uniform approximation in [F2], with . If two continuous representatives agree almost everywhere, their difference is continuous and zero on a dense subset of , hence zero everywhere; the representative is unique.
Depends on
Used by
- A parabolic adjoint gives the gradient when the state map is differentiable Theorem
- Parabolic finite-element gradient errors include the time-dependent Ritz residual Theorem
- Parabolic linear-quadratic control has an energy adjoint and reduced gradient Theorem
- Semidiscrete Ritz error splitting and energy estimate Theorem
- Well-posedness for measurable coercive parabolic forms Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Christian Clason, Introduction to Finite Element Methods, lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Long Chen, Finite Element Methods for Parabolic Equations (standard reference, not scraped)