Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Semidiscrete Ritz error splitting and energy estimate

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and the bounded polyhedral mesh setting, spaces, form and data of Well-posedness and energy stability of the semidiscrete FEM system. Let u be the continuous solution supplied by Well-posedness for measurable coercive parabolic forms on the same evolution triple and let uh be the corresponding semidiscrete solution. For this error identity, assume the additional regularity u∈H1(0,T;V), meaning u,u′∈L2(0,T;V) with the unique continuous representative supplied by Time derivatives of fixed and differentiable comparison projections. Let Ph:V→Vh be a fixed bounded linear comparison map, define ρ(t)=Phu(t)−u(t),θ(t)=uh(t)−Phu(t), and let Rh(t)∈Vh∗ be the full residual Rh(t)(vh)=(ρ′(t),vh)H+a(t;ρ(t),vh). Then for almost every t and every vh∈Vh, (θ′(t),vh)H+a(t;θ(t),vh)=−Rh(t)(vh), and for every t∈[0,T], ∥θ(t)∥H2+α∫0t∥θ(s)∥V2ds≤∥θ(0)∥H2+α−1∫0t∥Rh(s)∥Vh∗2ds.

The same identity and energy bound hold for an operator-norm C1 time-dependent comparison map Ph(t):V→Vh, with its time derivative included in ρ′ as stated below. For a time-independent form and the Ritz projection Ph=Rh from The elliptic Ritz projection for a conforming finite-element space, Galerkin orthogonality makes a(ρ(t),vh)=0, so the residual is exactly (Rhu′(t)−u′(t),vh)H. If a time-dependent comparison Ph(t) is used, it must be operator-norm C1; then ρ′=Ph′(t)u+Ph(t)u′−u′, including the projection-derivative term. For a measurable time-dependent form with a fixed comparison map, no orthogonality is inferred and the full displayed residual remains.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the bounded polyhedral mesh, W1,2-norm spaces and data from the semidiscrete existence theorem; the continuous and semidiscrete solutions to that same problem; u∈H1(0,T;V); and a fixed bounded linear map Ph:V→Vh (or the stated C1 family).

[F1]

The continuous solution satisfies ⟨u′,v⟩+a(t;u,v)=⟨f,v⟩; under the additional u′∈L2(0,T;V) assumption, the canonical embedding identifies ⟨u′,vh⟩ with (u′,vh)H (Well-posedness for measurable coercive parabolic forms, Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).

[F2]

The semidiscrete solution satisfies the same variational equation for all vh∈Vh (Well-posedness and energy stability of the semidiscrete FEM system).

[F3]

A fixed Ritz projection is bounded and linear, and its defining orthogonality is a(Rhw,vh)=a(w,vh) (The elliptic Ritz projection for a conforming finite-element space, Existence, uniqueness, linearity, and boundedness of the Ritz projection).

[F4]

Every H1(0,T;X) input has a unique continuous representative, and fixed or operator-norm C1 comparison maps obey the stated weak time-derivative product rules (Time derivatives of fixed and differentiable comparison projections).

[F5]

For a W(0,T;V) function, 12(∥z(t)∥H2−∥z(0)∥H2)=∫0t⟨z′,z⟩ (The evolution-space energy identity and continuous H trace).

[F6]

The form satisfies ∣a(t;x,y)∣≤M∥x∥V∥y∥V and a(t;x,x)≥α∥x∥V2 (Bounded, coercive and symmetric sesquilinear forms).

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited from the continuous and finite-element existence suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

1.1F4F6givenconstruct

The fixed-map product rule [F4] gives (Phu)′=Phu′, so ρ′=Phu′−u′∈L2(0,T;V). For a C1 family it gives instead ρ′=Ph′u+Phu′−u′. Also θ′=uh′−(Phu)′. The residual is an element of L2(0,T;Vh∗): for each fixed vh, approximate the strongly measurable ρ by simple V-valued functions. Scalar measurability of a(t;w,vh) for each fixed w makes the corresponding simple-function pairings measurable, and the bound [F6] lets their pointwise limits pass to a(t;ρ(t),vh). The first term (ρ′,vh)H is measurable as well. Because Vh is finite-dimensional, measurability on a finite basis gives strong measurability of the Vh∗-valued residual. Moreover, ∥Rh(t)∥Vh∗≤ci2∥ρ′(t)∥V+M∥ρ(t)∥V, so it is square-integrable.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Subtract [F1] from [F2]. Since uh−u=θ+ρ and uh′−u′=θ′+ρ′, the result for each vh is (θ′,vh)H+a(t;θ,vh)=−(ρ′,vh)H−a(t;ρ,vh)=−Rh(t)(vh). This uses only the variational equations; no commutation of the full evolution operator with Ph is assumed.

3.1F5F6step 2.1algebra

Put vh=θ(t) in step 2.1 and use [F5]. Coercivity from [F6] and Cauchy–Schwarz/Young give 12∥θ(t)∥H2−12∥θ(0)∥H2+α2∫0t∥θ(s)∥V2ds≤12α∫0t∥Rh(s)∥Vh∗2ds. Multiplying by 2 proves the asserted energy bound.

4.1F3F4step 2.1given∎

In the time-independent Ritz case, [F3] gives a(ρ(t),vh)=a(Rhu(t)−u(t),vh)=0 for every vh. By [F4], ρ′=Rhu′−u′, which yields the special residual stated above. In the time-dependent case this cancellation has not been assumed, so step 2.1 retains the complete residual, including Ph′u when the comparison varies.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources