How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Parabolic finite-element methods
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Banach Valued Integration and the Radon Nikodym Property
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Céa and Aubin–Nitsche error estimates
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Complex Subspace Realification
- Complexification, Realification and Real Structures
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Convexity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Distributions Test Functions and Differentiation
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces Adjoint Operators and Annihilators
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Surface Measure, Divergence, and Green Identities
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces and Riesz Lemma
- Finite-element meshes and interpolation
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fourier Transform Convolution and Approximate Identities
- Fredholm Elliptic Problems and the Elliptic Spectrum
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Harmonic Functions and Mean Values in Rn
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lax--Milgram and Weak Elliptic Solutions
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schwartz Space and the Plancherel Theorem
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Approximation and Sobolev Extension
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Sobolev Poincare and Morrey Inequalities
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- The Analytic Hahn Banach Theorem
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Direct Method and Euler--Lagrange Equations
- The Exponential Function
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Weak Derivatives and Sobolev Spaces
2 · Summary
The page treats parabolic evolution in a real Hilbert triple, first proving the time-trace and energy identities needed for variational well-posedness. The continuous measurable-coefficient problem is solved by a space-time BNB argument. Local lemmas prove measurability of the form's inverse action and the Hilbert-space BNB criterion; arbitrary initial data in are reached by approximating them with data in and passing to a weak limit. Countable Choice is stated wherever it enters mollification, weak compactness, Lax–Milgram, and the zero-boundary finite-element inclusion.
The time-stepping definitions use scalar interval averages, so they depend only on almost-everywhere coefficient and load classes. Backward Euler has a piecewise-affine reconstruction and a first-order nodal estimate when its initial value matches the semidiscrete solution. The Crank–Nicolson estimate is second order when the initial value matches the semidiscrete solution and the stated regularity holds. Maximum-in-time energy bounds and full-interval dissipation bounds are stated separately.
For spatial error, the page defines the generally nonsymmetric Ritz map and retains the full residual when the form is measurable in time. A time-dependent comparison projection requires an operator-norm hypothesis and contributes its derivative. The local Sobolev-space lemma verifies the separable Hilbert evolution triple used by the concrete zero-boundary finite-element results. The spatial-rate corollary is conditional on the primal interpolation and adjoint regularity/approximation hypotheses; the full-adjoint case is not asserted on arbitrary polyhedral domains.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space
Definition
Let and be real Hilbert spaces and let be an injective, continuous linear map with dense range. Let be the continuous real linear dual of . Identify with its Hilbert dual by its inner product and embed into by The resulting dense continuous embeddings are written and is called an evolution triple. The pairing between and is denoted .
For a Hilbert space , is the space of equivalence classes of strongly measurable -valued functions with Strong measurability means being an almost-everywhere pointwise limit of measurable simple functions. For and , say that is the weak time derivative of when for every and every . The derivative is unique up to equality almost everywhere. The parabolic energy space is with norm No endpoint values are part of this definition; they are assigned only after a continuous trace representative has been proved. Separability is an additional hypothesis when it is needed by a later result.
Smooth mollifiers approximate Bochner L² functions
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be a real Hilbert space, let be strongly measurable, and let be a nonnegative smooth mollifier family of mass one. Define Then each is smooth with values in and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, a real Hilbert space , a strongly measurable , and a nonnegative smooth compactly supported scalar kernel of mass one at each scale.
Strong measurability is almost-everywhere pointwise norm approximation by finite-valued measurable simple functions (Strongly measurable Banach-valued function).
A strongly measurable function with integrable norm is Bochner integrable, and the Bochner integral is the norm limit of simple integrals (Bochner integrability criterion, Bochner-integrable function).
Scalar translations are continuous and isometric on under Countable Choice ( in as , for ).
The mollifier kernel is smooth, nonnegative, compactly supported, and has integral one (The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump).
The norm of a Bochner integral is at most the integral of the norm (Bochner integral norm inequality).
Tonelli permits changing the order of integration for a nonnegative measurable function (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).
Scalar dominated convergence turns almost-everywhere convergence under an integrable majorant into convergence of the integrals (Dominated convergence).
Lebesgue measure is translation invariant, so scalar and Bochner translations preserve their norms (Translation of a function on , Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation).
Countable Choice is assumed by the scalar translation theorem (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Finite-valued simple functions are dense in Bochner . Choose simple almost everywhere as in [F1]. Replace by zero where . The clipped functions are still simple, converge to almost everywhere, and have squared error bounded by . Scalar dominated convergence [F7] gives convergence in . If almost everywhere, the zero simple sequence suffices.
For fixed , the integrand in the definition of is strongly measurable and has integrable norm on the compact support of the kernel, so [F2] defines the Bochner integral. Differentiating the scalar kernel under this integral gives Indeed, for in a fixed compact interval the difference quotients of each kernel derivative converge uniformly and are bounded on one compact set; the norm of on that set and [F5] let the limit pass through the integral. The same bound proves continuity of every displayed derivative, so is smooth.
For a finite-valued simple function , omit zero values; each remaining has finite measure. Then , which tends to zero by [F3]. For general , use the density from step 1.1 and translation's isometry [F8] to obtain .
Fix with for the generating bump, so by [F4]. Since is a probability measure, Cauchy–Schwarz and [F5] give Integrate in and apply [F6]. The result is bounded by , which tends to zero by step 2.1. This proves the asserted convergence.
The Hilbert-space discrete energy identity
Statement
For every real Hilbert space and ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real Hilbert space and vectors .
A real Hilbert inner product is symmetric and bilinear, and (Hilbert space).
Proof
Expand the last square using [F1]: .
Substituting this expression into the right-hand side gives by bilinearity. This is the stated identity.
The Hilbert-space Babuška–Nečas–Babuška criterion
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let and be real Hilbert spaces and let be a bounded bilinear form. Suppose there is such that and the only satisfying for every is . Then, for every bounded linear functional , there is a unique such that for every , and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, real Hilbert spaces , the bounded bilinear form , its stated inf-sup bound, and the trivial right kernel.
Every bounded real linear functional on a Hilbert space has a unique Riesz representative with the same norm (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces).
A closed linear subspace of a Hilbert space and its orthogonal complement give a direct decomposition of the whole space (Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace).
A Hilbert space is complete in its norm (Hilbert space).
Countable Choice is the hypothesis of the Riesz representation and orthogonal-decomposition suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
If , the right-kernel hypothesis forces ; the only is zero and is the unique solution. If and , the inf-sup hypothesis fails for any nonzero , so no such instance satisfies the assumptions. Assume henceforth both spaces are nonzero. For each , the functional is bounded and linear. By [F1], let be the unique vector satisfying for every . Bilinearity and uniqueness make linear, and the Riesz norm identity gives , where is a continuity bound for .
The inf-sup assumption gives . Thus is injective. If in , then , so completeness of gives for some . The bound in step 1.1 gives , hence . Therefore is closed.
If , then for every ; the right-kernel hypothesis gives . Apply [F2] to the closed subspace . Its orthogonal complement is zero, so ; therefore is onto.
For the given , let be its Riesz representative, so and . Surjectivity supplies with , whence for all , using symmetry of the real inner product. The lower bound proves the estimate and also uniqueness.
Backward Euler FEM with interval-averaged forms and load
Definition
Input a real evolution triple and a finite-dimensional conforming
subspace with its inherited inner product and norm; a
finite-element use instantiates it with a zero-boundary conforming polynomial
space. Input also a final time , a finite partition
, and a real bilinear form family
such that
is measurable for each fixed .
There must be constants , and one null set
such that
The same exceptional set and constants apply to all pairs. Input a strongly
measurable load and an initial value . A
finite-element load is supplied as its restriction
. For and ,
form the scalar bilinear and Bochner load averages
For , solve for from
Return the nodes , the piecewise-constant function
on each open interval (endpoint values do
not affect the function), and the continuous piecewise
affine reconstruction joining consecutive nodes. The initial
value is the separately supplied ; the initial jump is
, and subsequent jumps are . Invalid spaces, partitions,
or form/data hypotheses return invalid-input; the well-definedness theorem
proves that each indicated solve has a unique answer under the stated
hypotheses. Because coefficients and loads are averaged,
this procedure is defined on their almost-everywhere equivalence classes and
does not sample a representative at a point. For a time-dependent form this
is the averaged-coefficient backward Euler method; with piecewise-constant
time trials it is also the step.
Crank–Nicolson and cG(1) for an autonomous parabolic form
Definition
Input a finite-dimensional conforming subspace with its
inherited inner product and norm; a finite-element use instantiates it
with a zero-boundary conforming polynomial space. Input also a final time
, a finite partition
, a time-independent real bounded coercive
bilinear form on , a load , and .
Put . For
, solve
Return the nodal values and their continuous piecewise-linear interpolant.
There are no interior time jumps; the initial value is the supplied .
The coefficient form is time-independent, while the load is averaged, so no
point value of an equivalence class is used. Invalid inputs return
invalid-input; the well-definedness theorem proves that each indicated step
has a unique solution under the stated hypotheses.
For each interval, the same equation is the continuous-Galerkin equation with continuous piecewise-linear trial functions and constant test functions: integrating gives , and integrating the linear trial function in the time-independent form gives its midpoint value. Thus this item asserts the equivalence only; it does not assert rates for higher-degree or discontinuous-Galerkin methods.
Time mollification preserves the evolution-space derivative
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be a real evolution triple and . There are smooth -valued functions on a neighborhood of such that The weak time derivative in the definition of is unique up to almost-everywhere equality. No separability assumption on is needed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, the real evolution triple, , and a function with weak derivative ).
The evolution-space derivative is defined by testing against every and scalar in the displayed distribution identity (Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).
Smooth mollifications of a Bochner function converge in and are smooth with values in the target Hilbert space (Smooth mollifiers approximate Bochner L² functions).
Strongly measurable functions with integrable norm are Bochner integrable, and a bounded linear map commutes with Bochner integration (Bochner integrability criterion, Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration).
Fubini changes the order of integration for an absolutely integrable scalar function on the finite product interval (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).
On , square-integrable scalar functions are integrable, with (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).
Countable Choice is assumed by the Bochner approximation result (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Let both satisfy [F1], and put . For every and , . Therefore every Bochner convolution of the zero extension, , vanishes on any compact subinterval whose distance from exceeds : its scalar pairing against each is the zero distribution tested by . By [F2], in local , so almost everywhere.
Regard as a -valued function through the continuous embedding and set . The Bochner integral exists by [F3], and [F5] gives . For each fixed , [F4] and scalar integration by parts show that has weak derivative in the sense of [F1]. Thus has zero distribution derivative. For any with integral zero, its primitive is compactly supported in , hence in . Fix with integral one and put . Subtracting shows for every test . The convolutions of are therefore zero on compact subintervals as in step 1.1; [F2] makes them converge to in local . Hence almost everywhere, and is a continuous representative of .
Reflect the -valued class evenly to across and , and reflect oddly. The continuous representative from step 2.1 has matching values at each seam. Integration by parts on the three intervals therefore shows that the reflected function has weak derivative equal to the odd reflection of ; the endpoint terms cancel, so there are no point masses. Extend both functions by zero beyond . For , the convolution on the resulting neighborhood of does not see the extension jumps at or .
Let be a nonnegative smooth mollifier of mass one, supported in , and convolve the reflected functions in time. On a neighborhood of , is smooth with values in by [F2]. Testing the reflected weak derivative identity against a fixed and integrating by parts in the scalar variable gives . The bounded inclusion commutes with the Bochner integral by [F3], so in .
Apply the approximation in [F2] to the reflected -valued function and its derivative, then restrict to . This gives in and in as .
Choose any sequence small enough that each convolution is defined on a neighborhood of , and set . Step 5.1 gives both asserted convergences, and step 4.1 gives . The uniqueness in step 1.1 identifies .
Measurable actions and inverse actions of parabolic forms
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be a separable real Hilbert space, let , and let . Suppose is real bilinear and is measurable for each fixed . Assume there is one null set outside which for all , with and . For a.e. outside that null set define and by Then, for every , both and are strongly measurable and belong to . For a.e. , the two equations have unique solutions. The solution functions are strongly measurable, belong to , and satisfy On the exceptional null set set all operator actions and solutions to zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A separable real Hilbert space , an evolution triple containing , the scalar-measurable bilinear form with its common uniform bound and coercivity constants, and .
functions are strongly measurable equivalence classes, and an evolution triple embeds continuously into and then into (Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).
A bounded coercive real bilinear form is bounded by and has ; symmetry is not required (Bounded, coercive and symmetric sesquilinear forms).
Under Countable Choice, a separable real Hilbert space and its continuous dual are isometric by the Riesz representation, so separability of implies separability of (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces).
Under Countable Choice, a bounded coercive real bilinear form on a Hilbert space has a unique variational solution, with solution norm at most times the datum norm (The Lax--Milgram theorem).
If measurable sets decrease inside a finite-measure set, their measures decrease to the measure of their intersection (Continuity from above when one set has finite measure).
A countable union of measurable null sets is null (Finite and countable subadditivity of measures).
Countable Choice is assumed by [F3] and [F4] (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
If , all spaces and maps in the claim are zero and the result holds. Otherwise choose countable dense sets in and , the latter available by [F3]. For fixed , the functional has norm at most . On a countable dense subset of the unit sphere, for each fixed . Hence these norm distances are measurable. Approximating by the first point of a countable dense subset of within gives a measurable countably-valued approximation.
For a.e. fixed outside the common null set, apply [F4] to and to its transpose . Both forms have the same bounds and coercivity because their diagonal values agree. This gives the unique pointwise and solving the two equations.
Choose a countable linearly independent sequence whose linear span is dense in ; if is finite-dimensional, use a finite basis and set once it is exhausted. Let . The Galerkin systems for have measurable matrix entries and measurable right-hand sides. Their matrices are invertible: testing a homogeneous system by its trial vector and using coercivity forces that vector to be zero. Matrix inversion therefore makes the coefficient vectors, and hence , strongly measurable.
Truncate the th countably-valued approximation after its first values, replacing the tail by zero. By [F5], choose so the tail set has measure at most . These truncations are finite-valued measurable functions; [F6] shows that outside a null set only finitely many tails occur, so they converge pointwise to . Thus is strongly measurable. Applying the same argument to the transposed form proves that is strongly measurable for each fixed .
For any , Galerkin orthogonality and coercivity give Thus ; the identical argument for the transposed form gives the same estimate for . Density of makes both Galerkin sequences converge pointwise to their unique solutions. Their limits are strongly measurable.
Approximate any strongly measurable pointwise a.e. by finite-valued simple functions . For each , and are strongly measurable by step 2.1. The uniform operator bounds give pointwise convergence to and off the common null set, and . This proves strong measurability and square integrability of both actions.
Testing each pointwise variational equation by its solution gives and the same inequality for . If a solution is zero the claimed bound is immediate; otherwise division by its norm yields the two pointwise estimates. Squaring and integrating proves with the asserted bounds.
Time derivatives of fixed and differentiable comparison projections
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be a separable real Hilbert space and a real Hilbert space, and let (meaning with distribution derivative). It has a unique continuous representative on . Let be a fixed bounded linear map. Then and .
If instead is continuously differentiable in operator norm, then and In particular, a differentiable time-dependent Ritz comparison contributes the term to its residual derivative.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , a separable real Hilbert space , a real Hilbert space , the weak time-derivative convention, , and a fixed bounded map or an operator-norm family.
The Statement defines by Bochner membership of the function and distribution derivative, checked after every continuous scalar functional; the classes use the strongly measurable convention (Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).
Strongly measurable functions with integrable norm are Bochner integrable, and bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration (Bochner integrability criterion, Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration).
Smooth mollifiers converge to Bochner functions in local (Smooth mollifiers approximate Bochner L² functions).
Scalar Fubini changes the order of integration for absolutely integrable functions on the finite product interval (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).
is contained in by Holder's inequality (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).
Countable Choice is an explicit hypothesis of the Bochner approximation supplier (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Let both satisfy the distributional derivative identity for . Put and extend it by zero to . For every fixed and every interior farther than from the endpoints, the scalar pairing of with is zero: it is the zero distribution paired with . Since continuous linear functionals separate points, . By [F3] these convolutions converge to in on compact subintervals; exhausting proves a.e., so the weak derivative is unique.
The Bochner integral exists by [F2] and [F5]. For each , scalar Fubini [F4] and integration by parts show that has weak derivative . Hence has zero distribution derivative. If has integral zero, its primitive is compactly supported, so in . Choose with integral one and put . Subtracting shows that has zero distribution. As in step 1.1 its interior convolutions vanish, and [F3] makes them converge to locally in . Thus a.e. and is a continuous representative. Any two continuous representatives equal a.e. agree everywhere, because their continuous difference vanishes on the dense set where they agree; hence this representative is unique.
For fixed , test the weak derivative identity for against for arbitrary . Boundedness of gives The right side is represented by the function , and uniqueness from step 1.1 gives .
For the operator-norm family, fix and put , so . Use the representative from step 2.1. For , scalar Fubini and integration by parts give Indeed, substitute on the left, interchange the integrals over , and use ; a second Fubini interchange combines the terms into . Absolute integrability follows from boundedness of and [F5]. Since this identity holds for all and , the vector-valued weak derivative is .
The displayed derivative belongs to because and are bounded on and . Hence with the asserted formula.
Bounded sequences in a separable Hilbert space have weakly convergent subsequences
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Every bounded sequence in a separable real Hilbert space has a weakly convergent subsequence. If is a separable real Hilbert space, then and are separable real Hilbert spaces, their product is a separable Hilbert space, and the graph of the weak time-derivative operator is closed there. Consequently is a closed Hilbert subspace of that product and every bounded sequence in has a weakly convergent subsequence.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A separable real Hilbert space and a sequence with .
consists of strongly measurable equivalence classes with the square-integral norm, and the weak time derivative is the scalar test identity stated for the parabolic energy space (Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).
Riesz representation identifies the continuous dual of a real Hilbert space isometrically with that space; hence is separable when is separable (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces).
Rational box-step functions are countable and dense in scalar under Countable Choice; restricting them to gives a countable dense subset of (Rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of for ).
Holder, Minkowski, monotone convergence and dominated convergence apply to the scalar integrals used below (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, Minkowski's inequality for integrals, including , Monotone convergence for the integral, Dominated convergence).
A countable union of measurable null sets is null (Finite and countable subadditivity of measures).
Measures of increasing sets converge to the measure of their union (Continuity from below for measures).
Every closed subspace of a Hilbert space and its orthogonal complement decompose the whole space (Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace).
A Hilbert space is complete in its induced norm (Hilbert space).
Countable Choice supplies representatives for countably many classes and the assumptions of [F2], [F3] and [F7]; the coordinate extraction below is deterministic (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence (Bolzano-Weierstrass: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence).
Proof
Apply Gram–Schmidt to a countable dense sequence in , omitting zero remainders, to obtain a finite or countable orthonormal family with dense span. Use the following deterministic extraction for each bounded real sequence with . Start with ; at each bisection retain the left closed half if it contains infinitely many terms, and otherwise the right closed half, which then contains infinitely many terms. From the th retained interval select the least index larger than the preceding selected index whose term lies in that interval. The selected terms lie in nested intervals of diameters tending to zero, hence are Cauchy; [F9] gives a convergent subsequence, so the entire selected sequence converges. This rule determines the extracted indices uniquely, including when , and can therefore be recursively applied to successive coordinates without dependent choice. For finitely many coordinates use the last extracted subsequence; for infinitely many take the diagonal of the nested subsequences, whose indices are strictly increasing and whose tail lies in every earlier subsequence. If the family is empty retain the original sequence. The resulting has a limit for each coordinate present.
Let be any separable real Hilbert space. The formula is well-defined by pointwise Cauchy–Schwarz and Holder [F4], and its induced norm is the square-integral norm. To prove completeness, let be Cauchy. By [A1], choose a subsequence with summable successive distances and representatives for that countable subsequence. Put . Minkowski bounds partial-sum norms by the sums of the norms; monotone convergence [F4] gives . Its infinite-value set is null, since positive measure would force for every . Thus converges in complete for a.e. to . The limit is strongly measurable: because is separable, distances to a countable dense set are measurable; first-dense-point approximants are countably valued, and finite truncations with summable exceptional-set measures converge a.e. by [F5]–[F6]. The pointwise tail estimate and Minkowski give The original Cauchy sequence then converges to . This proves that is Hilbert.
Finite-valued simple functions are dense in : take the pointwise simple approximants from [F1], replace values by zero where their norm exceeds twice the target norm, and use dominated convergence [F4]; the squared error is at most nine times the target's squared norm. Approximate the finitely many values by a countable dense subset of , and each scalar indicator by the countable dense family [F3]. Since has finite measure, these approximations produce a countable dense family of finite sums in . With [F2], this proves that both and , and therefore their product, are separable Hilbert spaces.
For each , orthogonality gives . Thus is square-summable, so its partial sums form a Cauchy sequence; completeness [F8] gives the Hilbert-series limit in .
Inner products converge to when lies in the finite span of the , by coordinate convergence. For arbitrary , approximate it by such a finite-span vector using the dense span from step 1.1; the uniform bound gives . First choose large, then large. Therefore .
The derivative graph is closed in the product: if strongly in both factors, continuous embedding and Cauchy–Schwarz let every scalar test identity [F1] pass to the limit. Thus the graph is a closed Hilbert subspace. It is weakly closed: a weak limit is orthogonal to the graph's orthogonal complement, so [F7] gives for that closed subspace. Apply steps 1.1–3.1 to the separable product Hilbert space. Every bounded graph sequence has a weakly convergent subsequence by that argument, and its limit remains in the graph. This proves the asserted weak subsequential compactness in .
The zero-boundary Sobolev energy space is a separable Hilbert space
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be a bounded polyhedral open set with . Put Then is a separable real Hilbert space, and the inclusion is continuous, injective and dense. Consequently is a real evolution triple in the sense of Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space. The gradient norm is equivalent to this norm on by Poincare's inequality.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice and a bounded polyhedral open set .
Real with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space under Countable Choice ( with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).
For , rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of under Countable Choice (Rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of for ).
consists of classes with all first weak derivatives in , with norm squared the sum of their squared norms; is the norm closure of (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure).
On a set bounded in one direction, every obeys (The Poincare inequality for zero-boundary Sobolev closures on domains bounded in one direction).
is dense in under Countable Choice (Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in ).
A dense continuous Hilbert inclusion gives the canonical evolution triple and dual pairing (Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).
A space is separable when it has a countable dense subset (Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset).
Countable Choice supplies the dense-set selections used below and is required by [F1], [F2] and [F5] (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
If , then and the assertions hold. Otherwise choose finite such that ; boundedness permits this. Then [F4] applies to and gives .
The rational box-step family from [F2], restricted to , is countable and dense in : for , set on and elsewhere. This extension is measurable because is measurable, and . Extension of a null-set difference remains null, so is well-defined on classes and is an isometry. Approximate in by [F2], and restrict the approximants back to , which cannot increase the error. Therefore is separable by [F7]. Finite products of the resulting countable dense set show that is separable; its product inner product makes it a real Hilbert space.
Map by . The norm from [F3] makes an isometry onto its image. Its image is closed: if in , then for every and every , where each limit follows from Cauchy–Schwarz in . Thus is the weak derivative , and the limit lies in the image. A closed subspace of the complete Hilbert space is complete in its inherited inner product, so is Hilbert.
By [F3], is a closed subspace of , hence Hilbert for the inherited Sobolev inner product. From step 1.1, Thus the gradient norm is equivalent to the inherited Hilbert norm and is also complete; the norm chosen for in the Statement is the inherited norm.
Since is a subspace of the separable metric space , it is separable. For any point in a relatively open set, choose such that lies in that set. Choose a center from a countable dense subset of with , then a positive rational with . The relative balls form a countable base. By [A1], choose one point from every nonempty base member; these points are dense. Apply the same argument to the subspace . The equivalent gradient norm from step 3.1 induces the same topology, so is separable in its stated norm.
By [F5], is dense in . It is a subset of by [F3], so is dense in . Step 1.1 gives continuity of the inclusion, and injectivity holds because both spaces consist of almost- everywhere classes of the same functions. The defining hypotheses in [F6] now hold, giving the canonical dense inclusion and the claimed evolution triple.
Finite-dimensional parabolic Galerkin ODEs with measurable coefficients
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional real subspace of an evolution space , continuously included in . Let be real bilinear, measurable in , uniformly bounded by and coercive by on . If and , then there is a unique with and for every and almost every . It satisfies Here means absolutely continuous -valued coefficient functions whose value and derivative are square-integrable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The real evolution triple, finite-dimensional , the measurable bounded coercive form, , and .
The Hilbert embedding and the associated dual pairing are as defined in Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space.
For a nonempty compact interval and , the space is complete in the supremum metric (Continuous -valued curves on a nonempty compact interval form a complete supremum-metric space).
A contraction from a nonempty complete metric space to itself has a unique fixed point, obtained as the limit of its iterates (A contraction of a nonempty complete metric space into itself has exactly one fixed point, the limit of the iterates from any starting point).
Proof
If , the only possible solution is and the equation and estimate hold. Otherwise choose a finite -orthonormal basis of . In this basis the variational equation is , where and . The entries of are measurable and bounded because the basis is finite and the form is uniformly bounded; is in by finite dimensionality and Cauchy–Schwarz.
Choose a finite partition of with each interval length satisfying (any partition works if ). On each interval , fix the incoming vector independently of the trial curve: initially it is the coefficient vector of , and subsequently the endpoint of the preceding interval solution. The map maps into itself: is integrable and is essentially bounded, so its integrand is integrable for every continuous . The space is nonempty and complete by [F2], and . Thus is a contraction, and [F3] gives its unique fixed point (the limit of the Picard iterates). This fixed point is absolutely continuous, equals at , and solves the ODE almost everywhere. Concatenating the finitely many intervals gives a continuous absolutely continuous global solution with the prescribed initial value, and uniqueness follows successively on those intervals. Its continuous coefficient vector is bounded on , so ; hence the solution belongs to the stated .
In the variational equation choose . Absolute continuity gives . Coercivity and Young's inequality yield Integrating from to proves the stated energy estimate.
The elliptic Ritz projection for a conforming finite-element space
Definition
Let be a real evolution triple and let be a finite-dimensional conforming subspace. In a mesh instance, the algebraic piecewise-polynomial conventions are those of Broken and conforming polynomial spaces on a matching mesh; the required inclusion into is an explicit hypothesis of this definition. Let be time-independent, bounded, and coercive as in Bounded, coercive and symmetric sesquilinear forms, with constants and . For , the equation for the unknown is the Ritz equation; any solution is called a Ritz projection of . The item Existence, uniqueness, linearity, and boundedness of the Ritz projection ↗ proves that for every there is exactly one solution, denoted , and that these solutions define a bounded linear map . The form need not be symmetric.
The evolution-space energy identity and continuous H trace
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be the real evolution triple of Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space, and let . Each has a unique representative in , and for all , Writing , the trace obeys
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real evolution triple, , and .
consists of with weak derivative ; the embedding is continuous (Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).
Each such admits smooth -valued approximants converging in whose time derivatives converge to in (Time mollification preserves the evolution-space derivative).
Countable Choice is assumed by the time-mollification supplier Time mollification preserves the evolution-space derivative (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
For a smooth -valued function , the continuous inclusion into and the ordinary product rule give by the canonical embedding Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space.
For smooth , choose with . Integrating step 1.1 from to any gives Apply this to differences of the approximants in [F2]; they are Cauchy in . Their uniform limit is continuous and agrees with almost everywhere by their convergence. The same bound passes to the limit.
For approximants from [F2], integrate step 1.1 between arbitrary . Uniform convergence passes the two endpoint norms to those of the continuous representative. The integrands converge in because whose right-hand side tends to zero. This proves the energy identity for all .
Apply the energy identity from step 2.2 to and , subtract, and use the real polarization identity . Bilinearity gives the asserted integration-by-parts identity.
The trace estimate is the smooth bound in step 2.1 passed through the uniform approximation in [F2], with . If two continuous representatives agree almost everywhere, their difference is continuous and zero on a dense subset of , hence zero everywhere; the representative is unique.
Backward Euler stability, first-order error for exact initial data, and reconstruction bounds
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional conforming subspace of a real evolution triple. Let be real bilinear and measurable in for each fixed pair. Assume there is one null set outside which, with common constants and , Let . Let be the semidiscrete solution from Finite-dimensional parabolic Galerkin ODEs with measurable coefficients. On a finite partition , put and . For the interval-averaged backward Euler values from Backward Euler FEM with interval-averaged forms and load, define and let be the affine reconstruction, with on . Every step has a unique solution. With the separate maximum and cumulative bounds are The reconstruction satisfies where . For the nodal error, define Then the error obeys the separate bounds Thus exact initial projection gives first-order maximum nodal error. The reconstruction estimates provide bounds for later compactness arguments; they do not themselves assert compactness.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional conforming subspace , the measurable bounded/coercive form, , the semidiscrete trajectory , a finite time partition, and .
Instantiate backward Euler with the algorithm's form and load . It uses the corresponding interval-average forms and load, and its step equation is the displayed variational equation (Backward Euler FEM with interval-averaged forms and load).
The exact finite-dimensional semidiscrete trajectory exists in and satisfies the variational equation (Finite-dimensional parabolic Galerkin ODEs with measurable coefficients).
The form is bounded by and coercive by (Bounded, coercive and symmetric sesquilinear forms).
Proof
Fix a finite basis of and write the th variational step as a square linear system for the coefficients of . If its homogeneous system has solution , testing by gives . Coercivity [F4] implies . Thus the square matrix has zero kernel and is invertible, proving a unique solution at each step without a choice axiom.
With the instantiation in [F1], for all ; changing the form on its common null set does not change this average. Integrate the semidiscrete equation [F2] over and subtract it from the backward Euler step. With , this gives where The fundamental theorem of calculus in finite-dimensional yields . Cauchy–Schwarz gives .
Test the step equation with , multiply by , use [F3], and bound by . Summing and applying Jensen's inequality gives, for every , Taking the maximum of the endpoint term over proves the maximum bound; setting proves the cumulative bound.
On , and the step equation gives in , where is the averaged form operator. Its norm is at most , proving the derivative bound by squaring and integrating. Also with ; integrating gives . Since has norm at most , this proves the reconstruction difference bound.
Test the error equation from step 1.2 with , multiply by , use [F3], and absorb by . Summing to any and using the residual estimate in step 1.2 gives, for every , Taking the maximum of the endpoint term and setting for the cumulative term prove the two asserted bounds.
Second-order Crank–Nicolson nodal error for exact initial data under H2 time regularity
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional conforming subspace of a real evolution triple. Assume a time-independent real bilinear form is bounded by and coercive by , the load , and the partition and data of Crank–Nicolson and cG(1) for an autonomous parabolic form. Every time step has a unique solution and, with , If the exact semidiscrete solution from Finite-dimensional parabolic Galerkin ODEs with measurable coefficients satisfies , meaning with weak time derivatives. Under this regularity assumption, set , , and Then the error satisfies the separate bounds Thus exact initial projection gives second-order maximum nodal error. The regularity hypothesis is on the time-dependent semidiscrete solution and is not implied by the method definition.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional real conforming subspace , the autonomous bounded/coercive form, , initial value , a finite time partition, and—only for the error estimate—an exact semidiscrete solution .
Crank–Nicolson uses the average of the endpoint states in the time-independent form and the interval-average load (Crank–Nicolson and cG(1) for an autonomous parabolic form).
The exact semidiscrete trajectory solves the Galerkin ODE and belongs to , the space of absolutely continuous coefficient functions with function and derivative in (Finite-dimensional parabolic Galerkin ODEs with measurable coefficients).
The difference quotient identity is (The Hilbert-space discrete energy identity).
The form is bounded by and coercive by (Bounded, coercive and symmetric sesquilinear forms).
Proof
Fix a finite basis of and express one CN step as a square linear system. Its bilinear form is . If the homogeneous system has solution , testing with gives . Coercivity [F4] implies ; the square matrix is therefore invertible. Thus the step has exactly one solution by finite-dimensional linear algebra, without a choice axiom.
Integrating the semidiscrete equation from [F2] over gives the exact step with replaced in the form by its time average . Subtract it from the CN equation. With and , the result is
Test the CN equation by and multiply by . The midpoint identity follows from [F3], since . Coercivity and Young's inequality give Sum through any and apply Jensen to obtain Taking the maximum of the endpoint term and setting for the sum prove the separate stability bounds.
On of length , let be the affine interpolant of . Since , solve with by two integrations. The Green kernel for with zero endpoint values is It has zero endpoint values and derivative jump at , so ; the difference between this and has second derivative zero and zero endpoint values, hence is zero. Therefore The kernel satisfies . Therefore by Tonelli's theorem for the nonnegative integrand and Cauchy–Schwarz. Consequently
Test the error equation from step 1.2 by , multiply by , and use the midpoint consequence of [F3]. Coercivity and Young's inequality give Sum through any and apply step 2.2 to obtain Taking the maximum of the endpoint term and setting for the sum prove the separate error bounds.
Existence, uniqueness, linearity, and boundedness of the Ritz projection
Statement
Let be finite-dimensional, and let be a real bounded coercive bilinear form with constants and . For every there is a unique satisfying the defining equation of The elliptic Ritz projection for a conforming finite-element space. The map is linear and The argument uses only finite-dimensional linear algebra; it adds no choice axiom.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional real subspace , a real bounded/coercive form , and .
The Ritz equation for unknown is for every ; its solution is denoted (The elliptic Ritz projection for a conforming finite-element space).
Boundedness and coercivity mean and (Bounded, coercive and symmetric sesquilinear forms).
Proof
If , define ; the Ritz equation, uniqueness, and norm bound are immediate. Otherwise fix a finite ordered basis of . Form the square matrix and vector . If and , then for each , hence . Coercivity [F2] gives , so basis independence gives . Thus has zero kernel and, being square, is invertible. Its unique solution defines the unique satisfying [F1].
Testing [F1] with gives If , the bound is immediate; otherwise divide by .
For and real scalars , bilinearity shows that satisfies [F1] for . Uniqueness from step 1.1 gives . The norm bound from step 2.1 proves boundedness, so is the required linear map.
Well-posedness for measurable coercive parabolic forms
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let , let be a separable real Hilbert space, and let be its real evolution triple. Suppose is bilinear and scalar measurable for each fixed pair , and there is one null set outside which for all , with constants and . Let and . Then there is a unique with and, for almost every , For every it satisfies The proof applies BNB to the space-time form. Scalar measurability suffices because is separable and the measurable inverse action is proved locally.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; the separable real evolution triple; ; the common almost-everywhere bounded/coercive scalar-measurable form; ; and .
consists of with weak derivative , under the displayed scalar test convention (Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).
Every function has a unique continuous representative and satisfies the energy-pairing identity (The evolution-space energy identity and continuous H trace).
For separable , the product is a separable Hilbert space, its weak-derivative graph is closed, and bounded sequences in have weakly convergent subsequences (Bounded sequences in a separable Hilbert space have weakly convergent subsequences).
For the stated form, and are strongly measurable, and the pointwise direct and transposed coercive equations have measurable solutions (Measurable actions and inverse actions of parabolic forms).
A bounded space-time bilinear form with the stated inf-sup bound and trivial right kernel solves every bounded variational equation uniquely (The Hilbert-space Babuška–Nečas–Babuška criterion).
If a locally integrable scalar function pairs to zero with every smooth compactly supported test function, it vanishes almost everywhere (The fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations).
A countable union of null sets is null (Finite and countable subadditivity of measures).
Countable Choice is retained by the trace, weak compactness, measurable inverse, BNB, and scalar distribution suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
If , density in forces , and the only data and solution are zero, so the conclusion holds. Assume henceforth . By [F1], has the stated graph norm. Set and , with the inherited norm. By [F3], and are Hilbert spaces; by the trace bound in [F2], is a closed Hilbert subspace. Define The integrand is measurable by [F4], and Cauchy–Schwarz and the form bound give .
For , let solve and set , where . By [F4], and , so with . Since , coercivity and the operator bound give . The energy identity [F2] and give . The remaining mixed term obeys , and Young's inequality bounds it by . Therefore where . For , positivity forces , and together with gives ; the inequality is trivial for .
Suppose and for every . By [F4], belongs to . Taking for and in gives . By [F1], this means weakly, so . Testing the weak derivative identity against and expanding shows that has weak derivative . Its trace at zero is zero, so . Substituting this and using gives Hence in , proving the trivial right-kernel condition.
The preceding steps verify the boundedness, inf-sup and right-kernel hypotheses of [F5]. Consequently, for every the functional has a unique solution to for all . Its boundedness follows from Cauchy–Schwarz.
By density of in and [A1], choose with . The measurable-action result [F4] gives . Let be the solution from step 3.1 for , and let be the constant path. Then has and for every .
For , test the equation for with . By [F2], coercivity, and , The right side is bounded uniformly in . Also by [F4]. Testing with shows for every fixed and . Choose a countable dense subset of , apply [F6] to its scalar pairings, and take the union of their null sets. Outside that null set continuity of gives . Thus a.e. and . Together these estimates bound in .
By [F3], a subsequence converges weakly in to some . The trace map is bounded linear by [F2], so weak trace convergence and in imply . For every , and boundedness of from step 1.1 let us pass to the weak limit, giving . With , testing by and applying [F6] on a countable dense subset of as in step 5.1, with [F7] to unite the null sets, proves the pointwise variational equation for a.e. and every . Testing the limiting identity with and using [F2] gives the stated energy estimate for every .
If are two solutions with the same data, lies in and satisfies for every . The uniqueness in [F5] applied to the zero functional gives . This proves uniqueness.
Well-posedness and energy stability of the semidiscrete FEM system
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let and let be a bounded polyhedral open set, let be a finite matching affine simplicial mesh of , and choose . Let with its norm, , and let be the continuous dual of ; these spaces form the separable real evolution triple proved in The zero-boundary Sobolev energy space is a separable Hilbert space. Let be the scalar degree-at-most- conforming polynomial subspace on whose polynomial traces vanish on every boundary facet, as defined by Broken and conforming polynomial spaces on a matching mesh. Suppose the real bilinear form on is scalar measurable and there is one null set outside which it is bounded by and coercive by on . Let and . Then there is a unique with satisfying for almost every . For every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, a bounded polyhedral open set, a finite matching affine mesh and its scalar zero-boundary conforming polynomial space, the -norm evolution triple, the uniformly bounded/coercive measurable form, , and .
On a finite matching affine mesh, the zero-boundary conforming polynomial space from Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity is a finite-dimensional algebraic subspace of the broken polynomial product (Broken and conforming polynomial spaces on a matching mesh).
If its polynomial traces vanish on boundary facets and match on interior facets, that subspace lies in ; this is a closed subspace of the ambient evolution space under the present identification (Zero-boundary conforming polynomials lie in W0 1p and satisfy Poincare).
On any finite-dimensional , the measurable-coefficient Galerkin ODE has a unique absolutely continuous solution and the displayed energy estimate (Finite-dimensional parabolic Galerkin ODEs with measurable coefficients).
For bounded polyhedral , with the norm and form a separable real evolution triple (The zero-boundary Sobolev energy space is a separable Hilbert space).
Countable Choice is assumed by the zero-boundary Sobolev supplier (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
By [F1], is finite-dimensional. Its zero-boundary trace condition and [F2] give , while [F4] verifies that the stated are a separable evolution triple. Countable Choice is retained exactly as in [A1].
Restriction of each to is a bounded functional, and the restriction map is continuous. Thus the restricted load is strongly measurable and square-integrable. Apply [F3] to this and the restricted form/load. It gives a unique satisfying the stated semidiscrete equation and energy estimate.
Semidiscrete Ritz error splitting and energy estimate
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and the bounded polyhedral mesh setting, spaces, form and data of Well-posedness and energy stability of the semidiscrete FEM system. Let be the continuous solution supplied by Well-posedness for measurable coercive parabolic forms on the same evolution triple and let be the corresponding semidiscrete solution. For this error identity, assume the additional regularity , meaning with the unique continuous representative supplied by Time derivatives of fixed and differentiable comparison projections. Let be a fixed bounded linear comparison map, define and let be the full residual Then for almost every and every , and for every ,
The same identity and energy bound hold for an operator-norm time-dependent comparison map , with its time derivative included in as stated below. For a time-independent form and the Ritz projection from The elliptic Ritz projection for a conforming finite-element space, Galerkin orthogonality makes , so the residual is exactly . If a time-dependent comparison is used, it must be operator-norm ; then , including the projection-derivative term. For a measurable time-dependent form with a fixed comparison map, no orthogonality is inferred and the full displayed residual remains.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; the bounded polyhedral mesh, -norm spaces and data from the semidiscrete existence theorem; the continuous and semidiscrete solutions to that same problem; ; and a fixed bounded linear map (or the stated family).
The continuous solution satisfies ; under the additional assumption, the canonical embedding identifies with (Well-posedness for measurable coercive parabolic forms, Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).
The semidiscrete solution satisfies the same variational equation for all (Well-posedness and energy stability of the semidiscrete FEM system).
A fixed Ritz projection is bounded and linear, and its defining orthogonality is (The elliptic Ritz projection for a conforming finite-element space, Existence, uniqueness, linearity, and boundedness of the Ritz projection).
Every input has a unique continuous representative, and fixed or operator-norm comparison maps obey the stated weak time-derivative product rules (Time derivatives of fixed and differentiable comparison projections).
For a function, (The evolution-space energy identity and continuous H trace).
The form satisfies and (Bounded, coercive and symmetric sesquilinear forms).
Countable Choice is inherited from the continuous and finite-element existence suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
The fixed-map product rule [F4] gives , so . For a family it gives instead . Also . The residual is an element of : for each fixed , approximate the strongly measurable by simple -valued functions. Scalar measurability of for each fixed makes the corresponding simple-function pairings measurable, and the bound [F6] lets their pointwise limits pass to . The first term is measurable as well. Because is finite-dimensional, measurability on a finite basis gives strong measurability of the -valued residual. Moreover, so it is square-integrable.
Subtract [F1] from [F2]. Since and , the result for each is This uses only the variational equations; no commutation of the full evolution operator with is assumed.
Put in step 2.1 and use [F5]. Coercivity from [F6] and Cauchy–Schwarz/Young give Multiplying by proves the asserted energy bound.
In the time-independent Ritz case, [F3] gives for every . By [F4], , which yields the special residual stated above. In the time-dependent case this cancellation has not been assumed, so step 2.1 retains the complete residual, including when the comparison varies.
Semidiscrete parabolic energy and L2 rates from elliptic approximation
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and the real scalar finite-element setting of Primal H¹ approximation on shape-regular affine finite-element meshes, on a shape-regular affine mesh family with . Let with its norm, , and let be a time-independent bounded coercive form with constants . Let be its Ritz projection and let be the semidiscrete solution initialized by . Assume the continuous solution obeys , for an integer . For almost every , assume the adjoint solution and approximation inequalities in The h^(r+s) L² rate under primal and dual approximation hold for each target and with common , , and , uniformly in . Let be the primal interpolation constant in that corollary and put Then and satisfy and Consequently, is bounded by the sum of the two bounds for , and In particular, the full-adjoint branch gives the conditional semidiscrete max-in-time rate in ; it requires both stated dual hypotheses and does not assert full adjoint regularity on an arbitrary polyhedral domain.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; the exact shape-regular affine finite-element interpolation hypotheses; a real time-independent bounded/coercive form; the continuous and semidiscrete solutions with exact initial Ritz projection; the spatial regularity of ; and the two uniform adjoint conditions for each of those targets.
Countable Choice is assumed in the Cea and adjoint Galerkin suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The two adjoint regularity and approximation inequalities hold uniformly for the elliptic Ritz errors with targets and , with the common constants in Statement (The h^(r+s) L² rate under primal and dual approximation).
The displayed time-dependent spatial Sobolev regularity assumptions on and hold.
with its usual norm, , and the dual form a separable real evolution triple (The zero-boundary Sobolev energy space is a separable Hilbert space).
Céa's estimate gives the Galerkin error at most times best approximation in (Céa quasi-optimality for coercive conforming Galerkin problems).
The affine finite-element interpolant maps the declared regular zero-boundary class into and has (Primal H¹ approximation on shape-regular affine finite-element meshes).
Under the two exact dual regularity/approximation inequalities stated above and Countable Choice, the static Galerkin error has the conditional bound (The h^(r+s) L² rate under primal and dual approximation).
The time-independent Ritz map is bounded linear; every has the unique continuous representative used for , and its weak derivative commutes with (The elliptic Ritz projection for a conforming finite-element space, Existence, uniqueness, linearity, and boundedness of the Ritz projection, Time derivatives of fixed and differentiable comparison projections).
The semidiscrete Ritz error satisfies the residual energy estimate; for this autonomous Ritz map its form residual vanishes (Semidiscrete Ritz error splitting and energy estimate).
Proof
For almost every , use the Ritz equation with target . It is the conforming Galerkin solution for the bounded functional . By [F1] and [F2], Taking the essential supremum proves the first estimate.
The target satisfies the real scalar finite-element hypotheses of [F3]; its Ritz projection is its Galerkin solution for . The assumed uniform adjoint constants therefore give . Apply the same argument to for almost every .
Since is fixed, [F4] gives . The estimate in step 1.2 bounds . The canonical embedding has norm at most , hence .
For the error splitting , the fixed Ritz orthogonality removes from the residual in [F5]. Its initial value is zero because . Applying [F5] and step 2.1 gives Taking the supremum and square roots proves the two stated bounds for .
The decomposition gives the bound by the triangle inequality. For the bound, step 1.1 gives , and step 3.1 bounds ; adding them proves the displayed estimate. The case follows by setting in the conditional dual branch.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.