Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The h^(r+s) L² rate under primal and dual approximation

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Assume the real scalar finite-element setting of Primal H¹ approximation on shape-regular affine finite-element meshes, and set V:=H01(Ω) with its usual H1 norm. Let Vh⊆V be the stated conforming discrete space, let a:V×V→R be the same bounded coercive form as in Céa quasi-optimality for coercive conforming Galerkin problems, and let u∈Wr+1,2(Ω)∩V and uh∈Vh solve the continuous and discrete equations for the same bounded linear datum F:V→R; assume also that Vh is finite-dimensional. The natural inclusion J:V→L2(Ω) obeys ∥Jv∥L2≤∥v∥H1. For e:=J(u−uh), let ze be the adjoint solution from Aubin–Nitsche L² error estimate from adjoint approximation. Suppose there are s∈(0,1], a normed regularity space Rs⊆V for ze, and constants CD,CR independent of h and e such that ∥ze∥Rs≤CR∥e∥L2(Ω). inf⁡wh∈Vh∥ze−wh∥H1(Ω)≤CDhs∥ze∥Rs. Then ∥u−uh∥L2(Ω)≤M2αCFECDCRhr+s∣u∣Wr+1,2(Ω). Here CFE is the primal interpolation constant and M,α are the boundedness and coercivity constants of a. In a full-adjoint Poisson branch, one may take R1=H2(Ω)∩H01(Ω) with the H2 norm, provided both displayed dual bounds hold. The hr+1 rate is conditional on those bounds and the primal approximation bound; no full-adjoint regularity is asserted on an arbitrary Lipschitz domain.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the shape-regular affine finite-element spaces and global interpolant of Primal H¹ approximation on shape-regular affine finite-element meshes, the same bounded coercive Galerkin form a and constants M,α, a bounded datum F:V→R, finite-dimensional Vh, the exponent r≥1, the adjoint problem, and the two dual regularity/approximation bounds in Statement. Here H01(Ω) is the zero-boundary Sobolev closure (Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure) and its usual H1 norm comes from Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms.

[F1]

The affine finite-element interpolant has the primal error bound ∥u−Ihu∥H1≤CFEhr∣u∣Wr+1,2 (Primal H¹ approximation on shape-regular affine finite-element meshes).

[F2]

Céa's estimate bounds the Galerkin error by M/α times the best energy approximation (Céa quasi-optimality for coercive conforming Galerkin problems).

[F3]

Under the two dual bounds in [A1], the Aubin–Nitsche estimate gives ∥u−uh∥L2≤MCDCRhs∥u−uh∥H1 (Aubin–Nitsche L² error estimate from adjoint approximation).

[F4]

Under Countable Choice, H1(Ω) is Hilbert in its usual Sobolev norm, and H01(Ω) is its closed Hilbert subspace with the restricted inner product and norm (The Sobolev space H1 is a Hilbert space).

[A1]

The dual regularity and interpolation constants CR,CD are uniform in h and satisfy the two displayed inequalities in Statement.

Proof

1.1F1given

Since Ihu∈Vh by the finite-element approximation hypotheses, inf⁡vh∈Vh∥u−vh∥H1≤∥u−Ihu∥H1≤CFEhr∣u∣Wr+1,2 by [F1].

1.2F3F4A1given

By [F4], V=H01(Ω) is a Hilbert space in its stated H1 norm. Apply the Aubin–Nitsche estimate [F3] with V=H01(Ω) in its H1 norm, CI=CD, and the two dual bounds [A1]. This gives ∥u−uh∥L2≤MCDCRhs∥u−uh∥H1.

2.1F2F4step 1.1

Apply [F2] on the Hilbert space supplied by [F4] to the best-approximation bound in step 1.1. This gives ∥u−uh∥H1≤MαCFEhr∣u∣Wr+1,2.

3.1step 2.1step 1.2algebra∎

Substitute the H1 bound from step 2.1 into step 1.2. This gives ∥u−uh∥L2≤(M2/α)CFECDCRhr+s∣u∣Wr+1,2, including zero error without division. Setting s=1 gives hr+1 under the stated full adjoint hypotheses.

Remarks

The hr+1 conclusion requires a dual approximation estimate of order one for the actual discrete spaces; the primal interpolation item alone does not establish that estimate for every degree and every degree-of-freedom family. A separate global regularity input must also match the actual domain and adjoint operator. The rate is not unconditional on every polyhedral or Lipschitz problem.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources