How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Aubin–Nitsche L² error estimate from adjoint approximation
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and the conforming Galerkin setting of Céa quasi-optimality for coercive conforming Galerkin problems. Let with inner product linear in the first slot, and let be a continuous linear inclusion with . Put . The adjoint solution is the unique element of satisfying it exists by Well-posedness of the adjoint variational problem. Let , and let be a specified normed space of adjoint-regular functions. Assume constants independent of and the error satisfy Then The symbol means exactly the chosen regularity norm space in the two displayed assumptions; no fractional Sobolev interpolation estimate is asserted unless it verifies the second inequality. The integer endpoint may be instantiated with , using the norm. If , this is simply .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; the bounded coercive conforming Galerkin data and unique solutions; the continuous inclusion ; an exponent ; and the two dual regularity and approximation inequalities in Statement.
The Céa theorem gives unique and in the continuous and discrete spaces (Céa quasi-optimality for coercive conforming Galerkin problems).
A bounded linear functional has a unique adjoint solution with , under Countable Choice (Well-posedness of the adjoint variational problem).
Galerkin orthogonality gives for every (Galerkin orthogonality for conforming approximations).
On real or complex , the corresponding integral pairing is a well-defined inner product, linear in the first slot, and obeys (The complex pairing is well-defined and satisfies Cauchy–Schwarz).
Proof
Define . By [F4] and the assumed continuity of , so is a bounded linear functional. Fact [F2] gives the unique with .
Set in the adjoint equation. Then For any , [F3] gives , hence .
Since the scalar in step 2.1 equals the nonnegative real number , boundedness of gives for every . Taking the infimum and using the approximation and regularity assumptions yields
If , the conclusion is immediate. Otherwise divide step 3.1 by to obtain the asserted Aubin–Nitsche estimate.
Depends on
- Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- Galerkin orthogonality for conforming approximations
- Well-posedness of the adjoint variational problem
- Céa quasi-optimality for coercive conforming Galerkin problems
- The complex $L^2$ pairing is well-defined and satisfies Cauchy–Schwarz
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Luc Guermond, MATH 661 Fall 2025, Part VI, Chapter 26, Basic error analysis (standard reference, not scraped)
- Thomas Richter, Die Finite Elemente Methode für partielle Differentialgleichungen (standard reference, not scraped)
- Thomas Wick, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations (standard reference, not scraped)