How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Measurable actions and inverse actions of parabolic forms
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be a separable real Hilbert space, let , and let . Suppose is real bilinear and is measurable for each fixed . Assume there is one null set outside which for all , with and . For a.e. outside that null set define and by Then, for every , both and are strongly measurable and belong to . For a.e. , the two equations have unique solutions. The solution functions are strongly measurable, belong to , and satisfy On the exceptional null set set all operator actions and solutions to zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A separable real Hilbert space , an evolution triple containing , the scalar-measurable bilinear form with its common uniform bound and coercivity constants, and .
functions are strongly measurable equivalence classes, and an evolution triple embeds continuously into and then into (Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).
A bounded coercive real bilinear form is bounded by and has ; symmetry is not required (Bounded, coercive and symmetric sesquilinear forms).
Under Countable Choice, a separable real Hilbert space and its continuous dual are isometric by the Riesz representation, so separability of implies separability of (Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces).
Under Countable Choice, a bounded coercive real bilinear form on a Hilbert space has a unique variational solution, with solution norm at most times the datum norm (The Lax--Milgram theorem).
If measurable sets decrease inside a finite-measure set, their measures decrease to the measure of their intersection (Continuity from above when one set has finite measure).
A countable union of measurable null sets is null (Finite and countable subadditivity of measures).
Countable Choice is assumed by [F3] and [F4] (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
If , all spaces and maps in the claim are zero and the result holds. Otherwise choose countable dense sets in and , the latter available by [F3]. For fixed , the functional has norm at most . On a countable dense subset of the unit sphere, for each fixed . Hence these norm distances are measurable. Approximating by the first point of a countable dense subset of within gives a measurable countably-valued approximation.
For a.e. fixed outside the common null set, apply [F4] to and to its transpose . Both forms have the same bounds and coercivity because their diagonal values agree. This gives the unique pointwise and solving the two equations.
Choose a countable linearly independent sequence whose linear span is dense in ; if is finite-dimensional, use a finite basis and set once it is exhausted. Let . The Galerkin systems for have measurable matrix entries and measurable right-hand sides. Their matrices are invertible: testing a homogeneous system by its trial vector and using coercivity forces that vector to be zero. Matrix inversion therefore makes the coefficient vectors, and hence , strongly measurable.
Truncate the th countably-valued approximation after its first values, replacing the tail by zero. By [F5], choose so the tail set has measure at most . These truncations are finite-valued measurable functions; [F6] shows that outside a null set only finitely many tails occur, so they converge pointwise to . Thus is strongly measurable. Applying the same argument to the transposed form proves that is strongly measurable for each fixed .
For any , Galerkin orthogonality and coercivity give Thus ; the identical argument for the transposed form gives the same estimate for . Density of makes both Galerkin sequences converge pointwise to their unique solutions. Their limits are strongly measurable.
Approximate any strongly measurable pointwise a.e. by finite-valued simple functions . For each , and are strongly measurable by step 2.1. The uniform operator bounds give pointwise convergence to and off the common null set, and . This proves strong measurability and square integrability of both actions.
Testing each pointwise variational equation by its solution gives and the same inequality for . If a solution is zero the claimed bound is immediate; otherwise division by its norm yields the two pointwise estimates. Squaring and integrating proves with the asserted bounds.
Depends on
- Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space
- Bounded, coercive and symmetric sesquilinear forms
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Continuity from above when one set has finite measure
- Finite and countable subadditivity of measures
- The Lax--Milgram theorem
- Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Christian Clason, Introduction to Finite Element Methods, lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Long Chen, Finite Element Methods for Parabolic Equations (standard reference, not scraped)