Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Time mollification preserves the evolution-space derivative

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let (V,H,V∗) be a real evolution triple and u∈W(0,T;V). There are smooth V-valued functions un on a neighborhood of [0,T] such that un→uin L2(0,T;V),un′→u′in L2(0,T;V∗). The weak time derivative in the definition of W(0,T;V) is unique up to almost-everywhere equality. No separability assumption on V is needed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the real evolution triple, T>0, and a function u∈L2(0,T;V) with weak derivative g∈L2(0,T;V∗).

[F1]

The evolution-space derivative is defined by testing against every v∈V and scalar ϕ∈Cc∞(0,T) in the displayed distribution identity (Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).

[F2]

Smooth mollifications of a Bochner L2 function converge in L2 and are smooth with values in the target Hilbert space (Smooth mollifiers approximate Bochner L² functions).

[F3]

Strongly measurable functions with integrable norm are Bochner integrable, and a bounded linear map commutes with Bochner integration (Bochner integrability criterion, Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration).

[F4]

Fubini changes the order of integration for an absolutely integrable scalar function on the finite product interval (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F5]

On (0,T), square-integrable scalar functions are integrable, with ∥h∥L1≤T∥h∥L2 (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed by the Bochner L2 approximation result (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3A1given

Let g1,g2∈L2(0,T;V∗) both satisfy [F1], and put h=g1−g2. For every v∈V and ϕ∈Cc∞(0,T), ∫⟨h(t),v⟩ϕ(t) dt=0. Therefore every Bochner convolution of the zero extension, hϵ(t)=∫0Th(s)ηϵ(t−s) ds, vanishes on any compact subinterval whose distance from {0,T} exceeds ϵ: its scalar pairing against each v is the zero distribution tested by s↦ηϵ(t−s). By [F2], hϵ→h in local L2(V∗), so h=0 almost everywhere.

2.1F1F2F3F4F5step 1.1construct

Regard u as a V∗-valued function through the continuous embedding V↪V∗ and set G(t)=∫0tg(s) ds. The Bochner integral exists by [F3], and [F5] gives g∈L1(0,T;V∗). For each fixed v∈V, [F4] and scalar integration by parts show that G has weak derivative g in the sense of [F1]. Thus w:=u−G has zero distribution derivative. For any ψ∈Cc∞(0,T) with integral zero, its primitive is compactly supported in (0,T), hence ∫w(t)ψ(t) dt=0 in V∗. Fix η∈Cc∞(0,T) with integral one and put c=∫w(t)η(t) dt. Subtracting (∫ψ)η shows ∫(w−c)ψ=0 for every test ψ. The convolutions of w−c are therefore zero on compact subintervals as in step 1.1; [F2] makes them converge to w−c in local L2(V∗). Hence w=c almost everywhere, and u~(t):=c+G(t) is a continuous V∗ representative of u.

3.1F1step 2.1constructalgebra

Reflect the V-valued L2 class evenly to (−T,2T) across 0 and T, and reflect g oddly. The continuous V∗ representative from step 2.1 has matching values at each seam. Integration by parts on the three intervals therefore shows that the reflected function has weak V∗ derivative equal to the odd reflection of g; the endpoint terms cancel, so there are no point masses. Extend both functions by zero beyond (−T,2T). For 0<ϵ<T/2, the convolution on the resulting neighborhood of [0,T] does not see the extension jumps at −T or 2T.

4.1F1F2F3step 3.1construct

Let ηϵ be a nonnegative smooth mollifier of mass one, supported in (−ϵ,ϵ), and convolve the reflected functions in time. On a neighborhood of [0,T], uϵ=ηϵ∗u is smooth with values in V by [F2]. Testing the reflected weak derivative identity against a fixed v∈V and integrating by parts in the scalar variable gives ⟨uϵ′(t),v⟩=∫⟨g(s),v⟩ηϵ(t−s) ds=⟨(ηϵ∗g)(t),v⟩. The bounded inclusion V→V∗ commutes with the Bochner integral by [F3], so uϵ′=ηϵ∗g in V∗.

5.1F2step 3.1step 4.1

Apply the L2 approximation in [F2] to the reflected V-valued function and its V∗ derivative, then restrict to (0,T). This gives uϵ→u in L2(V) and uϵ′→g in L2(V∗) as ϵ↓0.

6.1step 1.1step 4.1step 5.1construct∎

Choose any sequence ϵn↓0 small enough that each convolution is defined on a neighborhood of [0,T], and set un=uϵn. Step 5.1 gives both asserted convergences, and step 4.1 gives un′=ηϵn∗g. The uniqueness in step 1.1 identifies g=u′.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources