How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Time mollification preserves the evolution-space derivative
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be a real evolution triple and . There are smooth -valued functions on a neighborhood of such that The weak time derivative in the definition of is unique up to almost-everywhere equality. No separability assumption on is needed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, the real evolution triple, , and a function with weak derivative ).
The evolution-space derivative is defined by testing against every and scalar in the displayed distribution identity (Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).
Smooth mollifications of a Bochner function converge in and are smooth with values in the target Hilbert space (Smooth mollifiers approximate Bochner L² functions).
Strongly measurable functions with integrable norm are Bochner integrable, and a bounded linear map commutes with Bochner integration (Bochner integrability criterion, Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration).
Fubini changes the order of integration for an absolutely integrable scalar function on the finite product interval (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).
On , square-integrable scalar functions are integrable, with (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).
Countable Choice is assumed by the Bochner approximation result (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Let both satisfy [F1], and put . For every and , . Therefore every Bochner convolution of the zero extension, , vanishes on any compact subinterval whose distance from exceeds : its scalar pairing against each is the zero distribution tested by . By [F2], in local , so almost everywhere.
Regard as a -valued function through the continuous embedding and set . The Bochner integral exists by [F3], and [F5] gives . For each fixed , [F4] and scalar integration by parts show that has weak derivative in the sense of [F1]. Thus has zero distribution derivative. For any with integral zero, its primitive is compactly supported in , hence in . Fix with integral one and put . Subtracting shows for every test . The convolutions of are therefore zero on compact subintervals as in step 1.1; [F2] makes them converge to in local . Hence almost everywhere, and is a continuous representative of .
Reflect the -valued class evenly to across and , and reflect oddly. The continuous representative from step 2.1 has matching values at each seam. Integration by parts on the three intervals therefore shows that the reflected function has weak derivative equal to the odd reflection of ; the endpoint terms cancel, so there are no point masses. Extend both functions by zero beyond . For , the convolution on the resulting neighborhood of does not see the extension jumps at or .
Let be a nonnegative smooth mollifier of mass one, supported in , and convolve the reflected functions in time. On a neighborhood of , is smooth with values in by [F2]. Testing the reflected weak derivative identity against a fixed and integrating by parts in the scalar variable gives . The bounded inclusion commutes with the Bochner integral by [F3], so in .
Apply the approximation in [F2] to the reflected -valued function and its derivative, then restrict to . This gives in and in as .
Choose any sequence small enough that each convolution is defined on a neighborhood of , and set . Step 5.1 gives both asserted convergences, and step 4.1 gives . The uniqueness in step 1.1 identifies .
Depends on
- Bochner-integrable function
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump
- Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space
- Bochner integral norm inequality
- Smooth mollifiers approximate Bochner L² functions
- Bochner integrability criterion
- Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration
- Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Christian Clason, Introduction to Finite Element Methods, lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Long Chen, Finite Element Methods for Parabolic Equations (standard reference, not scraped)