Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth mollifiers approximate Bochner L² functions

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let X be a real Hilbert space, let q∈L2(R;X) be strongly measurable, and let (ηϵ) be a nonnegative smooth mollifier family of mass one. Define qϵ(t)=∫Rηϵ(t−s)q(s) ds. Then each qϵ is smooth with values in X and ∥qϵ−q∥L2(R;X)⟶0(ϵ↓0).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a real Hilbert space X, a strongly measurable q∈L2(R;X), and a nonnegative smooth compactly supported scalar kernel of mass one at each scale.

[F1]

Strong measurability is almost-everywhere pointwise norm approximation by finite-valued measurable simple functions (Strongly measurable Banach-valued function).

[F2]

A strongly measurable function with integrable norm is Bochner integrable, and the Bochner integral is the norm limit of simple integrals (Bochner integrability criterion, Bochner-integrable function).

[F3]

Scalar translations are continuous and isometric on L2(R) under Countable Choice (∥τhf−f∥p→0 in Lp(Rn) as h→0, for 1≤p<∞).

[F4]

The mollifier kernel is smooth, nonnegative, compactly supported, and has integral one (The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump).

[F5]

The norm of a Bochner integral is at most the integral of the norm (Bochner integral norm inequality).

[F6]

Tonelli permits changing the order of integration for a nonnegative measurable function (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F7]

Scalar dominated convergence turns almost-everywhere convergence under an integrable majorant into convergence of the integrals (Dominated convergence).

[F8]

Lebesgue measure is translation invariant, so scalar and Bochner L2 translations preserve their norms (Translation of a function on Rn, Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation).

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed by the scalar translation theorem (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

1.1F1F7givenconstruct

Finite-valued simple functions are dense in Bochner L2. Choose simple sn→q almost everywhere as in [F1]. Replace sn by zero where ∥sn∥>2∥q∥. The clipped functions are still simple, converge to q almost everywhere, and have squared error bounded by 9∥q∥2. Scalar dominated convergence [F7] gives convergence in L2(X). If q=0 almost everywhere, the zero simple sequence suffices.

1.2F2F4F5givenconstruct

For fixed t, the integrand in the definition of qϵ(t) is strongly measurable and has integrable norm on the compact support of the kernel, so [F2] defines the Bochner integral. Differentiating the scalar kernel under this integral gives qϵ(k)(t)=∫ηϵ(k)(t−s)q(s) ds(k≥0). Indeed, for t in a fixed compact interval the difference quotients of each kernel derivative converge uniformly and are bounded on one compact set; the L1(X) norm of q on that set and [F5] let the limit pass through the integral. The same bound proves continuity of every displayed derivative, so qϵ is smooth.

2.1A1F1F3F8step 1.1algebra

For a finite-valued simple function s=∑j=1mxj1Ej, omit zero values; each remaining Ej has finite measure. Then ∥s(⋅−h)−s∥L2(X)≤∑j∥xj∥X∥1Ej(⋅−h)−1Ej∥L2, which tends to zero by [F3]. For general q, use the density from step 1.1 and translation's isometry [F8] to obtain ∥q(⋅−h)−q∥L2(X)→0.

3.1A1F3F4F5F6step 2.1algebra∎

Fix R>0 with supp⁡η⊂[−R,R] for the generating bump, so supp⁡ηϵ⊂[−Rϵ,Rϵ] by [F4]. Since ηϵ(s)ds is a probability measure, Cauchy–Schwarz and [F5] give ∥qϵ(t)−q(t)∥X2≤∫ηϵ(s)∥q(t−s)−q(t)∥X2 ds. Integrate in t and apply [F6]. The result is bounded by sup⁡∣s∣≤Rϵ∥q(⋅−s)−q∥L2(X)2, which tends to zero by step 2.1. This proves the asserted L2 convergence.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources