How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Second-order Crank–Nicolson nodal error for exact initial data under H2 time regularity
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional conforming subspace of a real evolution triple. Assume a time-independent real bilinear form is bounded by and coercive by , the load , and the partition and data of Crank–Nicolson and cG(1) for an autonomous parabolic form. Every time step has a unique solution and, with , If the exact semidiscrete solution from Finite-dimensional parabolic Galerkin ODEs with measurable coefficients satisfies , meaning with weak time derivatives. Under this regularity assumption, set , , and Then the error satisfies the separate bounds Thus exact initial projection gives second-order maximum nodal error. The regularity hypothesis is on the time-dependent semidiscrete solution and is not implied by the method definition.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional real conforming subspace , the autonomous bounded/coercive form, , initial value , a finite time partition, and—only for the error estimate—an exact semidiscrete solution .
Crank–Nicolson uses the average of the endpoint states in the time-independent form and the interval-average load (Crank–Nicolson and cG(1) for an autonomous parabolic form).
The exact semidiscrete trajectory solves the Galerkin ODE and belongs to , the space of absolutely continuous coefficient functions with function and derivative in (Finite-dimensional parabolic Galerkin ODEs with measurable coefficients).
The difference quotient identity is (The Hilbert-space discrete energy identity).
The form is bounded by and coercive by (Bounded, coercive and symmetric sesquilinear forms).
Proof
Fix a finite basis of and express one CN step as a square linear system. Its bilinear form is . If the homogeneous system has solution , testing with gives . Coercivity [F4] implies ; the square matrix is therefore invertible. Thus the step has exactly one solution by finite-dimensional linear algebra, without a choice axiom.
Integrating the semidiscrete equation from [F2] over gives the exact step with replaced in the form by its time average . Subtract it from the CN equation. With and , the result is
Test the CN equation by and multiply by . The midpoint identity follows from [F3], since . Coercivity and Young's inequality give Sum through any and apply Jensen to obtain Taking the maximum of the endpoint term and setting for the sum prove the separate stability bounds.
On of length , let be the affine interpolant of . Since , solve with by two integrations. The Green kernel for with zero endpoint values is It has zero endpoint values and derivative jump at , so ; the difference between this and has second derivative zero and zero endpoint values, hence is zero. Therefore The kernel satisfies . Therefore by Tonelli's theorem for the nonnegative integrand and Cauchy–Schwarz. Consequently
Test the error equation from step 1.2 by , multiply by , and use the midpoint consequence of [F3]. Coercivity and Young's inequality give Sum through any and apply step 2.2 to obtain Taking the maximum of the endpoint term and setting for the sum prove the separate error bounds.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Crank–Nicolson and cG(1) for an autonomous parabolic form.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Christian Clason, Introduction to Finite Element Methods, lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Long Chen, Finite Element Methods for Parabolic Equations (standard reference, not scraped)