Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The zero-boundary Sobolev energy space is a separable Hilbert space

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let Ω⊆Rd be a bounded polyhedral open set with d≥1. Put H=L2(Ω;R),V=W01,2(Ω;R),∥v∥V=∥v∥W1,2(Ω). Then V is a separable real Hilbert space, and the inclusion V↪H is continuous, injective and dense. Consequently (V,H,V∗) is a real evolution triple in the sense of Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space. The gradient norm ∥∇v∥L2 is equivalent to this norm on V by Poincare's inequality.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice and a bounded polyhedral open set Ω⊆Rd.

[F1]

Real L2(Ω) with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space under Countable Choice (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).

[F2]

For 1≤p<∞, rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of Lp(Rd) under Countable Choice (Rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of Lp(Rn) for 1≤p<∞).

[F3]

W1,2(Ω) consists of L2 classes with all first weak derivatives in L2, with norm squared the sum of their squared L2 norms; W01,2 is the norm closure of Cc∞(Ω) (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure).

[F4]

On a set bounded in one direction, every v∈W01,2 obeys ∥v∥L2≤CΩ∥∇v∥L2 (The Poincare inequality for zero-boundary Sobolev closures on domains bounded in one direction).

[F5]

Cc∞(Ω;R) is dense in L2(Ω;R) under Countable Choice (Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in L2).

[F6]

A dense continuous Hilbert inclusion V↪H gives the canonical evolution triple and dual pairing (Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).

[F7]

A space is separable when it has a countable dense subset (Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset).

[A1]

Countable Choice supplies the dense-set selections used below and is required by [F1], [F2] and [F5] (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

1.1A1F1F4givenchoose

If Ω=∅, then V=H={0} and the assertions hold. Otherwise choose finite a<b such that Ω⊂{x:a<x1<b}; boundedness permits this. Then [F4] applies to V and gives ∥v∥H≤CΩ∥∇v∥2.

1.2A1F1F2F7givenconstruct

The rational box-step family from [F2], restricted to Ω, is countable and dense in H: for h∈H, set Eh=h on Ω and Eh=0 elsewhere. This extension is measurable because Ω is measurable, and ∫Rd∣Eh∣2=∫Ω∣h∣2. Extension of a null-set difference remains null, so E is well-defined on L2 classes and is an isometry. Approximate Eh in L2(Rd) by [F2], and restrict the approximants back to Ω, which cannot increase the L2 error. Therefore H is separable by [F7]. Finite products of the resulting countable dense set show that Z:=Hd+1 is separable; its product inner product makes it a real Hilbert space.

2.1F1F3step 1.2givenalgebra

Map J:W1,2(Ω;R)→Z by J(u)=(u,D1u,…,Ddu). The norm from [F3] makes J an isometry onto its image. Its image is closed: if J(un)→(u,g1,…,gd) in Z, then for every φ∈Cc∞(Ω) and every i, ∫Ωu ∂iφ=lim⁡n∫Ωun ∂iφ=−lim⁡n∫ΩDiun φ=−∫Ωgiφ, where each limit follows from Cauchy–Schwarz in L2. Thus gi is the weak derivative Diu, and the limit lies in the image. A closed subspace of the complete Hilbert space Z is complete in its inherited inner product, so W1,2(Ω) is Hilbert.

3.1F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra

By [F3], V is a closed subspace of W1,2(Ω), hence Hilbert for the inherited Sobolev inner product. From step 1.1, ∥∇v∥22≤∥v∥W1,22=∥v∥22+∥∇v∥22≤(1+CΩ2)∥∇v∥22. Thus the gradient norm is equivalent to the inherited Hilbert norm and is also complete; the norm chosen for V in the Statement is the inherited W1,2 norm.

4.1A1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1givenchoose

Since W1,2(Ω) is a subspace of the separable metric space Z, it is separable. For any point x in a relatively open set, choose ϵ>0 such that B(x,ϵ)∩W1,2 lies in that set. Choose a center z from a countable dense subset of Z with ∥x−z∥<ϵ/4, then a positive rational r with ∥x−z∥<r<ϵ−∥x−z∥. The relative balls B(z,r)∩W1,2 form a countable base. By [A1], choose one point from every nonempty base member; these points are dense. Apply the same argument to the subspace V. The equivalent gradient norm from step 3.1 induces the same topology, so V is separable in its stated norm.

5.1F3F5F6step 1.1step 4.1given∎

By [F5], Cc∞(Ω;R) is dense in H. It is a subset of V by [F3], so V is dense in H. Step 1.1 gives continuity of the inclusion, and injectivity holds because both spaces consist of almost- everywhere classes of the same functions. The defining hypotheses in [F6] now hold, giving the canonical dense inclusion H↪V∗ and the claimed evolution triple.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources