How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The zero-boundary Sobolev energy space is a separable Hilbert space
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be a bounded polyhedral open set with . Put Then is a separable real Hilbert space, and the inclusion is continuous, injective and dense. Consequently is a real evolution triple in the sense of Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space. The gradient norm is equivalent to this norm on by Poincare's inequality.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice and a bounded polyhedral open set .
Real with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space under Countable Choice ( with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space).
For , rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of under Countable Choice (Rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of for ).
consists of classes with all first weak derivatives in , with norm squared the sum of their squared norms; is the norm closure of (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure).
On a set bounded in one direction, every obeys (The Poincare inequality for zero-boundary Sobolev closures on domains bounded in one direction).
is dense in under Countable Choice (Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in ).
A dense continuous Hilbert inclusion gives the canonical evolution triple and dual pairing (Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space).
A space is separable when it has a countable dense subset (Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset).
Countable Choice supplies the dense-set selections used below and is required by [F1], [F2] and [F5] (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
If , then and the assertions hold. Otherwise choose finite such that ; boundedness permits this. Then [F4] applies to and gives .
The rational box-step family from [F2], restricted to , is countable and dense in : for , set on and elsewhere. This extension is measurable because is measurable, and . Extension of a null-set difference remains null, so is well-defined on classes and is an isometry. Approximate in by [F2], and restrict the approximants back to , which cannot increase the error. Therefore is separable by [F7]. Finite products of the resulting countable dense set show that is separable; its product inner product makes it a real Hilbert space.
Map by . The norm from [F3] makes an isometry onto its image. Its image is closed: if in , then for every and every , where each limit follows from Cauchy–Schwarz in . Thus is the weak derivative , and the limit lies in the image. A closed subspace of the complete Hilbert space is complete in its inherited inner product, so is Hilbert.
By [F3], is a closed subspace of , hence Hilbert for the inherited Sobolev inner product. From step 1.1, Thus the gradient norm is equivalent to the inherited Hilbert norm and is also complete; the norm chosen for in the Statement is the inherited norm.
Since is a subspace of the separable metric space , it is separable. For any point in a relatively open set, choose such that lies in that set. Choose a center from a countable dense subset of with , then a positive rational with . The relative balls form a countable base. By [A1], choose one point from every nonempty base member; these points are dense. Apply the same argument to the subspace . The equivalent gradient norm from step 3.1 induces the same topology, so is separable in its stated norm.
By [F5], is dense in . It is a subset of by [F3], so is dense in . Step 1.1 gives continuity of the inclusion, and injectivity holds because both spaces consist of almost- everywhere classes of the same functions. The defining hypotheses in [F6] now hold, giving the canonical dense inclusion and the claimed evolution triple.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Evolution triples and the parabolic energy space
- Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure
- $L^2$ with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space
- Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in $L^2$
- The Poincare inequality for zero-boundary Sobolev closures on domains bounded in one direction
- Rational box-step functions form a countable dense subset of $L^p(\mathbb{R}^n)$ for $1 \le p < \infty$
Used by
- Semidiscrete parabolic energy and L2 rates from elliptic approximation Corollary
- The linear Ritz projection need not preserve the nonlinear p-Laplacian residual Counterexample
- Uniformly elliptic affine random diffusion model Definition
- Direct derivation of the semidiscrete Ritz residual Example
- Strong L2 compactness for weakly solenoidal MINI trajectories Lemma
- Affine random diffusion has a measurable Bochner solution Theorem
- Well-posedness and energy stability of the semidiscrete FEM system Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Christian Clason, Introduction to Finite Element Methods, lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Long Chen, Finite Element Methods for Parabolic Equations (standard reference, not scraped)