Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Direct derivation of the semidiscrete Ritz residual

Example

On the four-triangle unit-square fan mesh, take V=H01((0,1)2) with its usual H1 norm and H=L2((0,1)2). Let ϕ be the center hat and use the Dirichlet form a(v,w)=∫Ω∇v⋅∇w. Poincare's inequality and The zero-boundary Sobolev energy space is a separable Hilbert space give the stated separable evolution triple; on its H1 norm the form has M=1 and α=1/2. Set q(t)=e−t, u(t)=q(t)ϕ2, and define the forcing by ⟨f(t),v⟩=(u′(t),v)L2+a(u(t),v). Then u is the exact forced solution. Initialize the semidiscrete solution at uh(0)=Rhu(0) and write uh(t)=c(t)ϕ. This finite-dimensional example verifies the Ritz error identity by direct integration.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the unit-square fan mesh, its zero-boundary continuous P1 space, and center hat ϕ; the stated H1-norm evolution triple and Dirichlet form; and the manufactured forcing above.

[F1]

The conforming polynomial space is defined by matching polynomial traces on every interior facet and imposing zero traces on boundary facets (Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity, Broken and conforming polynomial spaces on a matching mesh).

[F2]

A real zero-boundary conforming piecewise polynomial on a finite matching affine mesh belongs to H01(Ω) under Countable Choice (Zero-boundary conforming polynomials lie in W0 1p and satisfy Poincare).

[F3]

Poincare's inequality on the unit square gives ∥v∥L2≤∥∇v∥L2≤∥v∥H1, so the usual H1 norm makes V Hilbert and the embedding into H continuous. The Dirichlet form is bounded by M=1 and coercive by α=1/2 because ∥v∥H12=∥v∥L22+∥∇v∥L22≤2∥∇v∥L22 (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, The Poincare inequality for zero-boundary Sobolev closures on domains bounded in one direction, Bounded, coercive and symmetric sesquilinear forms, The zero-boundary Sobolev energy space is a separable Hilbert space).

[F4]

The finite-element semidiscretization has a unique solution for measurable bounded coercive forms and loads (Well-posedness and energy stability of the semidiscrete FEM system).

[F5]

The Ritz equation has a unique solution characterized by a(Rhw,vh)=a(w,vh) for every vh∈Vh (The elliptic Ritz projection for a conforming finite-element space, Existence, uniqueness, linearity, and boundedness of the Ritz projection).

[F6]

With ρ=Rhu−u and θ=uh−Rhu, the semidiscrete equations give (θ′,vh)H+a(θ,vh)=−(ρ′,vh)H for a fixed Ritz map and a time-independent form (Semidiscrete Ritz error splitting and energy estimate).

[A1]

Countable Choice is retained by the finite-element inclusion and semidiscrete existence suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Verification

1.1F1F2F3F5A1given

The four triangles meet along whole edges and vertices and cover the closed square. On each triangle the center barycentric coordinate defines ϕ; these traces match, and its boundary trace is zero. An affine P1 function is determined by its three vertex values on each triangle, so the global zero-boundary P1 space has only the center value free and equals span⁡{ϕ}. Thus [F2] puts this trial space in H01(Ω); [F3] supplies the Hilbert and form hypotheses. The function u=qϕ2 is also a zero-boundary conforming piecewise polynomial and is in the energy space. Since q is smooth, u′=q′ϕ2∈V; therefore v↦(u′,v)L2 and v↦a(u,v) are continuous functionals on V, and the defined load is square-integrable. By [F5] the initial Ritz value is defined.

1.2givenalgebra

On each triangle K, ∣K∣=1/4, the center barycentric coordinate λ satisfies ∫Kλm=2∣K∣∫01∫01−x(1−x−y)mdy dx=2∣K∣/((m+1)(m+2)) for m=1,2,3 by affine change of variables and iterated integration. Hence ∫Ωϕ=1/3, ∫Ωϕ2=1/6, and ∫Ωϕ3=1/10. The altitude from the center to every boundary edge is 1/2, so ∣∇ϕ∣2=4 on each triangle. Thus a(ϕ,ϕ)=4 and a(ϕ2,ϕ)=2∑K∫Kϕ∣∇ϕ∣2=8/3. Also (ϕ2,ϕ)L2=1/10.

2.1F5step 1.2algebra

By [F5], Rhu(t)=(2/3)q(t)ϕ, since a((2/3)qϕ,ϕ)=q(8/3)=a(qϕ2,ϕ). Therefore ρ=q((2/3)ϕ−ϕ2) and (ρ′,ϕ)L2=q′((2/3)(1/6)−1/10)=q′/90.

3.1F3F4F6A1step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

Testing the semidiscrete equation with ϕ and using step 1.2 gives c′/6+4c=q′/10+8q/3. For θ=(c−2q/3)ϕ, direct substitution yields (θ′,ϕ)L2+a(θ,ϕ)=c′/6−q′/9+4c−8q/3=−q′/90=−(ρ′,ϕ)L2. This is [F6] for the sole basis vector, hence for every vh∈Vh by linearity. The calculation uses the initial Ritz projection, so θ(0)=0.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.