How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Elliptic residual and boundary stability from a maximum principle
Statement
Let be bounded and open, and let on , where is symmetric, for all and with , the coefficients are continuous and bounded, and . There is a constant , depending only on , , and the coefficient bounds, such that every with satisfies In particular, for any two functions ,
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The bounded domain, uniformly elliptic coefficient matrix, bounded lower-order coefficients with , and .
The operator expands with the positive principal part and zero-order coefficient shown in Shin's positive divergence-form operator.
A continuous function on the compact set attains its maximum; a function at an interior maximum has zero gradient and negative-semidefinite Hessian.
Proof
Proof strategy: construct a strict positive barrier and apply the weak maximum principle by perturbation.
Since is bounded, choose real numbers with on . Let and . Choose large enough that . For , [F1] gives Choose and set . Then on and .
Put , , and . For , the boundary values satisfy . In , because .
Suppose at some . Since on and is continuous on , its positive maximum is attained at an interior point. For sufficiently small , has an interior positive maximum as well: its value at is at least , while its boundary values are at most . At that interior maximum [F2] and give , contradicting . Hence on , and therefore Applying the same argument to yields the corresponding lower bound. Taking proves the first estimate; applying it to proves the second.
Depends on
Used by
- Exterior-sphere domains need not have global C2alpha Dirichlet solutions Counterexample
- Exterior spheres and continuous boundary data do not give global bounded C2alpha solvability False statement
- Smooth elliptic Dirichlet solvability from a boundary Sobolev bootstrap Lemma
- Elliptic PINN minimizers converge to the Dirichlet solution Theorem
- Exterior-sphere elliptic Dirichlet existence, energy and residual stability Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.