How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A figure-eight curve is an immersed image but not an embedded submanifold
Statement refuted
Every immersed image is an embedded submanifold.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The map from to .
The displayed claim is the false statement under discussion (The image of every immersion need not be an embedded submanifold).
(The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine), and the chain rule gives (The chain rule for total derivatives: ).
Counterexample
By [L1], , and as in the false-statement proof this never vanishes. Hence is an immersion.
The image passes through at and , and in fact at every integer multiple of . The two branches coming from and already have distinct tangent directions, so the image has a transverse self-crossing and is not locally homeomorphic to an interval at the origin.
Thus is an immersed image that is not an embedded submanifold, refuting [F1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, Immersed Submanifolds (standard reference, not scraped)