How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A value outside the image can still be regular
Example
For the smooth map , , the value is a regular value even though .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The map .
The definition of regular value allows the fibre to be empty (Regular and critical points and values).
The derivative of is (The exponential function is smooth and ), and the exponential maps bijectively onto (The exponential is a continuous bijection from onto ).
Verification
The image of is , so .
By [F1], regularity of asks whether every point of the empty fibre is regular, which is vacuously true. The derivative fact [L1] is compatible with that conclusion because the map has no critical point over .
Hence is a regular value although it is not attained.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nigel Hitchin, Differentiable Manifolds, Theorem 3.3 context (standard reference, not scraped)