Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The zero angular-momentum level has nonfree points and no regular reduction

Statement refuted

On TR3 with the rotation action of SO(3), the zero level of the angular-momentum moment map is a free SO(3)-space, 0 is a regular value, and the quotient is the smooth symplectic manifold produced by regular reduction. This is false: the level contains the fixed origin and points with circle stabilizers, and 0 is a critical value, so those hypotheses fail.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, M=TR3 with the cotangent-lift rotation action of SO(3), moment map μ(q,p)=q×p, and the value 0.

[A1]

ACω is countable choice; it is used only through the fundamental-field and reduction suppliers.

[F1]

The moment map of the rotation action is μ(q,p)=q×p under the identification so(3)R3, and it is an equivariant moment map. Angular momentum as the moment map for rotations of a cotangent bundle, SU(2) and SO(3): same local Lie theory, different groups.

[F2]

A value of a moment map is regular exactly when the infinitesimal stabilizers of the points of its level vanish; the reduction theorem requires a regular value and a free proper stabilizer action on the level. Regularity of a moment map is equivalent to local freeness, Marsden--Weinstein--Meyer symplectic reduction.

[F3]

On a regular level the characteristic kernel is exactly the tangent space of the stabilizer orbit. The characteristic kernel on a regular moment level.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The origin (q,p)=(0,0) lies on the zero level because 0×0=0, and it is fixed by every rotation; in particular its stabilizer is all of SO(3) and the infinitesimal stabilizer is the full Lie algebra so(3)0.

F1given
2.1

The point (q,p)=(e1,e1) also lies on the zero level, because e1×e1=0. Its stabilizer is the circle of rotations about the e1-axis: indeed g(e1,e1)=(ge1,ge1)=(e1,e1) exactly when ge1=e1. The orbit of this point therefore has dimension 2, while the orbit of the origin has dimension 0.

step 1.1F1
2.2

By [F2] the value 0 is not regular, since its level contains a point, the origin, with nonzero infinitesimal stabilizer; and the action on the level is not free because the origin is fixed. Hence the hypotheses of the reduction theorem both fail at this value.

step 1.1F2
3.1

Consequently no smooth reduced symplectic manifold is obtained for the value 0 by the theorem: the level is a stratified space whose strata carry orbits of dimensions 0 and 2, and the characteristic-kernel description of regular levels does not apply.

step 2.2F2F3
4.1

The zero angular-momentum level therefore has nonfree points and cannot be reduced by the free proper regular theorem; the false statement is refuted.

step 2.1step 3.1A1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources