Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonzero total integral obstructs exactness on a closed manifold

Statement

Let Mn be compact, oriented, and boundaryless, n≥1. A smooth top form ω with ∫Mω≠0 is not exact. In particular every positive smooth top form on a nonempty such M is not exact. Here ∫M is the choice-free finite-chart integral of Finite chart localization of compactly supported top forms, including boundary, which agrees with the general compact-support integral wherever that is defined.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Finite chart localization of compactly supported top forms, including boundary constructs the intrinsic finite signed-chart integral for compactly supported top forms, gives finite linearity and the single-chart formula for chart-supported forms, and gives strict positivity for a nonzero nonnegative form. Its construction is choice-free and applies to the boundaryless M here.

[F2]

Compact-support Stokes on Euclidean space gives ∫Rndζ=0 for every compactly supported smooth (n−1)-form ζ and n≥1.

[F3]

Form calculus extends locally across a manifold boundary gives linearity and chart-pullback naturality of exterior differentiation and support containment for d.

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

1.1F1F2F3

If ω=dη, compactness of M makes η compactly supported. Take the finite nonnegative chart cutoffs χi from [F1] near supp⁡η. They satisfy η=∑iχiη globally, so [F3] gives dη=∑id(χiη). Each χiη has compact support inside a boundaryless chart. Pull it into that chart and extend it by zero to a smooth compactly supported (n−1)-form on Rn; its support stays away from the artificial chart edge. Chart-pullback naturality and [F2] make the signed chart integral of d(χiη) zero. By the single-chart formula and finite linearity of [F1], ∫Mω=∑i∫Md(χiη)=0. Thus a nonzero integral excludes exactness.

2.1F1step 1.1∎

Let ω be positive on nonempty M. It is then a nonzero nonnegative compactly supported top form, so the strict-positivity clause of [F1] gives ∫Mω>0. Step 1.1 excludes exactness. On the empty manifold every integral is zero, so the nonzero-integral hypothesis cannot hold; the positive-form conclusion explicitly assumes nonempty M.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources