How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A second proof that adjoints are unique
Statement
If an endofunctor has two left adjoints and , then there is a unique natural isomorphism compatible with the two adjunction structures. The corresponding statement for right adjoints is also true.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Endofunctors and adjunctions and .
An adjunction to is the same thing as a dual object of in the composition monoidal category (A dual object in the endofunctor category is an adjoint functor).
Duals of a fixed object are unique up to a unique compatible isomorphism (Duals are unique up to a unique compatible isomorphism).
Proof
By [L1], the two adjunctions and make and into two left duals of the same object in the endofunctor composition monoidal category.
Applying [L2] to those two duals yields a unique compatible isomorphism . Compatibility with the duality data is exactly compatibility with the units and counits of the two adjunctions by [L1].
Hence left adjoints of a fixed functor are unique up to unique compatible natural isomorphism. The right-adjoint statement is the same argument with right duals.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Proposition 4.2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor Categories, Proposition 2.10.5 (standard reference, not scraped)