How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Universal agreement of absolute and unconditional convergence
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. For a Banach space , every unconditionally convergent series in is absolutely convergent if and only if is finite-dimensional. The zero-dimensional case is included.
Facts & Assumptions
Countable Choice holds (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Every infinite-dimensional Banach space has an unconditional nonabsolute series under Countable Choice (Dvoretzky--Rogers theorem).
Finite-dimensional coordinate maps and their inverses are continuous (A chosen algebraic basis identifies a finite-dimensional normed space with a coordinate space).
Unconditional convergence is equivalent to convergence under every bounded scalar multiplier (Equivalent forms of unconditional convergence).
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the Statement.
Suppose has finite positive dimension with basis , [given, L3, L2] and write . If is unconditional, then for each choose the bounded phases when and zero otherwise. By [L3], converges; applying the continuous th coordinate from [L2] shows .
The triangle inequality gives [given, step 1.1] . Summing and using step 1.1 over the finite set of coordinates proves . If the claim is immediate. Thus finite dimension implies universal agreement.
Conversely, if is infinite-dimensional, [A1] and [L1] supply an [given, A1, L1, step 2.1] unconditionally convergent series that is not absolutely convergent. Universal agreement therefore fails. This proves the reverse implication and the equivalence.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Dvoretzky and C. A. Rogers, Absolute and Unconditional Convergence in Normed Linear Spaces (standard reference, not scraped)