How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A chosen algebraic basis identifies a finite-dimensional normed space with a coordinate space
Statement
Let be a normed space over , read in the real case by A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms and the complex case by Complex norm and complex normed space. Let be an ordered basis (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis), and write . Give its coordinate norm
Define
Then is a topological isomorphism of normed spaces in the sense of A topological isomorphism of normed spaces.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A normed space over and an ordered basis .
An ordered basis is a finite list whose image is a basis (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis), and A finite list is an ordered basis if and only if every equals for exactly one ; those scalars are the coordinates of in that ordered basis identifies its span with exactly the vectors of the form , with those coordinates unique.
A topological isomorphism of normed spaces is a bounded linear bijection whose inverse is bounded (A topological isomorphism of normed spaces).
For , every norm on is equivalent to the Euclidean norm, and any two norms on are equivalent (For all norms on are equivalent).
The map , , is a bijection with the stated coordinate arithmetic ( is the real coordinate plane, with coordinate arithmetic).
Complex norms have full complex absolute homogeneity (Complex norm and complex normed space). Their realifications carry the same norm and metric (Realification of a complex vector space by restriction of scalars, Complex modulus restricts to real absolute value, Realification preserves a complex norm and its metric). The coordinate function is a complex norm, including (The complex coordinate sum norm, including the zero space).
Real absolute value is definite, multiplicative and subadditive (Basic properties of the absolute value, The triangle inequality).
Finite real sums distribute over addition and scaling and preserve inequalities (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products).
Proof
By [L1], every has exactly one coordinate list with . Therefore the displayed map is well defined, surjective, and injective.
is linear, because finite sums and scalar multiplication distribute over the coordinate formula: .
In the complex case, [L5] makes both and real norms on : for , separation uses injectivity in step 1.1, and homogeneity and the triangle inequality use step 1.2 and the norm on . The coordinate map is a real-linear bijection by [L4], so and are real norms on . If , the pairwise equivalence clause of [L3] gives a positive real such that for every . Thus . If , both spaces consist only of zero by [L1], and the inverse is bounded with bound zero.
Put , a finite real. Then so is bounded.
In the real case , the coordinate is a real norm: absolute-value definiteness, multiplicativity, and the triangle inequality give the three axioms by finite summation, including the empty list. The pullback is a norm on : definiteness uses step 1.1, and the triangle and homogeneity axioms come from the norm axioms on and the linearity of . If , then and the inverse of is the zero map, hence bounded. If , [L3] gives with for every , so for every . Thus is bounded in the real case.
Steps 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 verify the three clauses of [L2]. Therefore is a topological isomorphism of normed spaces.
Remarks
- The proof uses the coordinate norm because it makes the boundedness of immediate. Any other standard coordinate norm would do, and on a fixed finite-dimensional coordinate space all of them are equivalent.
- The finite-dimensional language in the title is implemented here by the actual datum the page uses: a chosen ordered basis of finite length.
Depends on
- A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms
- Basic properties of the absolute value
- The triangle inequality
- Finite sums and finite products, by recursion
- Laws of finite sums and finite products
- Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis
- A finite list $v : n \to V$ is an ordered basis if and only if every $x \in V$ equals $\sum_{i<n} \lambda_i v_i$ for exactly one $\lambda : n \to F$; those scalars are the coordinates of $x$ in that ordered basis
- A topological isomorphism of normed spaces
- For $n \ge 1$ all norms on $\mathbb{R}^n$ are equivalent
- $\mathbb C$ is the real coordinate plane, with coordinate arithmetic
- Complex norm and complex normed space
- Realification of a complex vector space by restriction of scalars
- Complex modulus restricts to real absolute value
- Realification preserves a complex norm and its metric
- The complex coordinate sum norm, including the zero space
Used by
- A linear map from a finite-dimensional normed space is bounded Corollary
- Closed finite-codimensional subspaces are complemented Corollary
- Every finite-dimensional normed space is Banach Corollary
- Finite-dimensional subspaces are complemented Corollary
- Universal agreement of absolute and unconditional convergence Corollary
- Averaged Hermitian form for a compact group Definition
- Compactly embedded normed spaces Definition
- A compact group with no faithful continuous finite-dimensional representation Example
- Finite-dimensional Auerbach bases Lemma
- Local convergence of the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff series Lemma
- Right-trivialized differential of the Lie-group exponential Lemma
- The Schauder coefficient space is Banach Lemma
- A normed space is locally compact if and only if it is finite-dimensional Theorem
- All norms on a finite-dimensional complex normed space are equivalent Theorem
- Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff theorem Theorem
- Classification of affine Coxeter diagrams and their Euclidean simplex realization Theorem
- The closed unit ball is compact if and only if the normed space is finite-dimensional Theorem
- Weak and norm topologies agree iff finite dimensional Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
73 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Daniel Daners, Introduction to Functional Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tomasz Kochanek, Functional analysis, Lecture 1 (standard reference, not scraped)